Tuesday, 21 May 2019








Now comes Plaintiff Matthew Hale, J.D,
Objecting to the Magistrate's   recommendation in all of it's respects and specifically as follows …

1. Claims 2-9, 13-14 and 16-19 may not lawfully be dismissed since the judgement of Hale V Federal Bureau of Prisons, ET AL, 18-1141, 2019 WL 117616, has not yet become "final"

The entire predicate for the Magistrate's recommendation that claims 2-9,  13-14 and 16-19 be dismissed is that the judgement of Hale V.   Federal Bureau Of Prisons, et al. has become "final" (Doc 8. at 4-8)

The Magistrate is quite simply incorrect. The tenth circuit only denied Hale's petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing En Banc on March 18th 2019 and thus Hale has 90 days from that date in which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supreme court (see rule 13 (3) of the rules of the supreme court of the United States) (This court can see for itself by reviewing the tenth circuit's docket that rehearing was in fact denied on March 18th 2019)

Why the Magistrate assumed that no such petition for panel rehearing had been filed, or that Hale was not going to petition for the supreme court rule of his case, or was unaware of the fact that a case is not "final" until the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supreme court has passed or such a petition has been denied, Hale does not know but clearly the Magistrate's recommendations as to these numerous claims is in error.

As a matter of fact Hale is busy putting together his petition for a writ of certiorari at this time and had to interrupt that work in order to file these objections to the Magistrate's (premature) recommendations.

Hale V. Bureau of Prisons is not "final" and will only become final if and when the supreme court denies cert. or grants cert. and rules in the respondents favor on the merits. On the other hand it is entirely possible that the supreme court will grant cert. and reverse the tenth circuit. A case can not possibly be final when it is still subject to review, namely by the supreme court.

Therefore, the Magistrate's recommendation that claims, 2-9, 13-14 and 16-19 of Hale's complaint be dismissed, must be overruled. The recommendation is in fact frivolous since Hale V. Federal Bureau of Prisons is not yet final. That case is going to the supreme court!

2. Claim 22 may not lawfully be dismissed either since no court has ruled as to the truth of the Warden's specific statement of fact which he made to the senator (Doc 8. at 8-10)

None of the quotations cited by the Magistrate from the tenth circuit go to weather the specific statement that Creativity " advocates for violence motivated by racial discrimination" is in fact true of false (Id at 10) It is, in other words, entirely possible that the statement which warden Waterousiam made to senator Duckworth is false not withstanding all of the findings or opinions of the tenth circuit cited. That is because there has been no adjudication whatever that Creativity "Advocates for violence motivated by racial discrimination" the specific statement which Waterousiam made.

Weather Creativity poses a loose or vague "threat" as far as the BOP is concerned is an unactionable opinion, Waterousiam, on the other hand, made a specific statement of fact about the religion (and Hale) concerning a supposed advocacy of racial violence that is subject to defamation law accordingly. "Advocacy" is a deliberate espousal and that has yet to be shown about Creativity.

Hale can "show that it (the statement) is false" (Doc 8 at 10) and he must be allowed to in the course of this case. Hale can and will prove in the course of this case that Creativity does not "Adovacte for violence motivated by racial discrimination" That was a very specific libel on Waterousiam's part and Hale has a legal right to try to prove that. There is nothing "legally frivolous" about a claim that can still be proved.


For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate's recommendation that various claims of Hale's complaint be dismissed (Doc 8) must be overruled in it's entirety.

Sincerely submitted
Matthew Hale, J.D  
May 6th 2019




Sunday, 12 May 2019

THE VOICE...Skinhead (Video)

                            Banned on YouTube #20
                             THE VOICE....Skinhead


Monday, 6 May 2019

Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case)... Recommendation To Dismiss In Part And To Draw Case


Gordon P. Gallagher, United States Magistrate Judge
Civil Action No. 19-cv-00752-LTB-GPG




S. HANSEN, and



This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Matthew Hale’s Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1)1. The matter has been referred to this Magistrate Judge for

1 "(ECF No. ___)" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this Recommendation. . Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the Court must review the Prisoner Complaint to determine whether any claims are appropriate for summary dismissal.

Complaint, which is the operative pleading. (ECF No. 1). He paid the filing fee. (ECF No. 5).
Plaintiff brings the Prisoner Complaint pursuant to Bivens and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA"). (ECF No. 1 at 4). Plaintiff alleges he is an "ordained minister in the non-Christian Church of the Creator", also referred to as "Creativity religious faith." (Id. at 7). Since his incarceration at the maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado, he contends Defendants have violated his rights because of his religious beliefs. (See generally ECF No. 1).

Plaintiff sets forth twenty-two claims: 1) violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause due to "ongoing harassment" because Plaintiff "does not adhere to the tenets of the Christian religion"; 2) violation of the freedom of speech due to "censorship" of his book; 3) violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause due to a "total ban on all of Hale’s religious mail"; 4) violation of RFRA due to the ban on Plaintiff’s "religious correspondence"; 5) violation of the freedom of speech due to the ban on Plaintiff’s "Creativity" correspondence; 6) violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause due to the refusal to mail a "sermon" prepared by Plaintiff and subsequent incident report; 7) violation of RFRA due to the refusal to mail a "sermon" prepared by Plaintiff and subsequent incident report; 8) violation of the freedom of speech due to the refusal to mail a "sermon" prepared by Plaintiff and subsequent incident report; 9) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment due to the incident report and discipline resulting from Plaintiff attempting to send his "sermon"; 10) violation of the freedom of speech due to the "censorship of an article written by Hale advocating for his release from prison by President Trump"; 11) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment by banning Plaintiff’s phone calls with his mother due to his attempt "to seek the newspaper publication of documents filed with this Court"; 12) violation of due process arising from no hearing prior to the ban of Plaintiff’s phone calls with his mother; 13) violation of the freedom of speech due to the refusal to mail an article Plaintiff wrote about "those who care about the future of their White Race" to his mother; 14) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment due to the charge of gang activity and subsequent discipline related to the article; 15) violation of the freedom of speech due to interference with his outgoing and incoming mail; 16) violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause due to the "refusal to let Hale have a book which espouses his religious faith," the "Racial Loyalty Portfolio"; 17) violation of RFRA due to refusing to allow Plaintiff to receive the "Racial Loyalty Portfolio"; 18) violation of the freedom of speech due to refusing to allow Plaintiff to receive the "Racial Loyalty Portfolio"; 19) violation of the freedom of speech based on withholding mail that mentions the title of books authored by Plaintiff; 20) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment arising from an incident report based on Plaintiff asking his mother to sell his personal belongings for money to pay legal costs; 21) violation of the freedom of speech due to the delayed mailing of Plaintiff’s letters; and 22) state law defamation arising from the characterization of Creativity advocating for "violence motivated by racial discrimination." (See ECF No. 1). Plaintiff requests injunctive relief and money damages. (Id. at 29-30).

II. Issue Preclusion

Under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, also referred to as issue preclusion, "when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit." Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 (1970). "[I]ssue preclusion bars a party from relitigating an issue once it has suffered an adverse determination on the issue, even if the issue arises when the party is pursuing or defending against a different claim." Park Lake Res. Ltd. Liab. v. U.S. Dep't of Agr., 378 F.3d 1132, 1136 (10th Cir. 2004). (citation omitted).
In general, issue preclusion applies when: (1) the issue previously decided is identical with the one presented in the action in question, (2) the prior action has been finally adjudicated on the merits, (3) the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was a party, or in privity with a party, to the prior adjudication, and (4) the party against whom the doctrine is raised had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior action.

Id. (citation and quotation omitted). "[I]f a court is on notice that it has previously decided the issue presented, the court may dismiss the action sua sponte, even though the defense has not been raised." Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 412, suppl., 531 U.S. 1 (2000) (citation omitted).

In 2014, Plaintiff commenced a similar action, Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW. On March 28, 2018, summary judgment was granted in favor of the federal Bureau of Prisons and against Plaintiff. Hale v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW, 2018 WL 1535508, at *1 (D. Colo. Mar. 28, 2018), aff'd, No. 18-1141, 2019 WL 117616 (10th Cir. Jan. 7, 2019). The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment on January 7, 2019. Hale v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 18-1141, -- F. App’x --, 2019 WL 117616, at *1 (10th Cir. Jan. 7, 2019).

In an Order and Judgment, the Tenth Circuit concluded that Plaintiff’s alleged religion of Creativity does not qualify as a religion subject to protection under RFRA 2019 WL 117616, at *5. The Tenth Circuit also determined that Creativity does not constitute "beliefs that are religious in nature" as required for the protections of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause. Id. at *6. Regarding mail restrictions, the court concluded,  the mail restrictions on Mr. Hale are rationally connected to the BOP’s security interests. There is overwhelming evidence in the record that Creativity poses an institutional security risk and that Mr. Hale has sought to advance the white-supremacist goals of Creativity in ways that pose a danger both inside and outside of ADX. By limiting Mr. Hale’s ability to send and receive mail communicating Creativity’s message, the BOP mitigates internal and external safety risks. Id. at *7.
Issue preclusion bars Plaintiff from relitigating the Tenth Circuit’s determinations in this action. Plaintiff’s RFRA and Free Exercise claims in this action rely on the allegation that Creativity is a religion. The Tenth Circuit decided this identical issue in the negative in the January 7, 2019 Order concerning Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW. That action has been finally adjudicated on the merits, as the court entered summary judgment, which was affirmed. Rivera v. Levitt, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1132, 1141 (D. Colo. 2000), aff'd sub nom., 44 F. App'x 934 (10th Cir. 2002) ("granting summary judgment on these claims constituted a final judgment on the merits") (collecting cases). Plaintiff was the plaintiff in that action and fully and fairly litigated the issues over nearly five years. See Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW. Thus, I recommend that Plaintiff’s RFRA and Free Exercise claims, specifically Claims 3, 4, 6, 7, 16, and 17, be dismissed with prejudice on the basis of issue preclusion. See Khan v. Thorley, 23 F. App'x 978 (10th Cir. 2001) (affirming dismissal with prejudice of claims barred by collateral estoppel).
Likewise, the claims regarding freedom of speech, mail restrictions, and alleged "censorship" of Plaintiff’s writings are barred by issue preclusion. The Tenth Circuit explained, The BOP has designated Creativity a security threat group (STG), because inmates following its tenets have engaged in acts of violence, including murdering other inmates and instigating race riots. Accordingly, the BOP has placed restrictions on Mr. Hale impacting his participation in Creativity.
Mr. Hale contends that the restrictions on Creativity-based communications violate his free speech and association rights. Restrictions on STG communications are imposed for security reasons existing inside and outside the prison.
We conclude that the mail restrictions on Mr. Hale are rationally connected to the BOP’s security interests. There is overwhelming evidence in the record that Creativity poses an institutional security risk and that Mr. Hale has sought to advance the white-supremacist goals of Creativity in ways that pose a danger both inside and outside of ADX. By limiting Mr. Hale’s ability to send and receive mail communicating Creativity’s message, the BOP mitigates internal and external safety risks.

Upon considering the Turner factors, we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate on Mr. Hale’s free speech/association claims targeting the BOP’s mail restrictions. Those restrictions are reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. 2019 WL 117616, at *1, *6-*8.

Certain of Plaintiff’s freedom of speech claims in this action rely on allegations that the speech at issue is based on Creativity and Plaintiff’s "philosophy." As explained above, the Tenth Circuit decided this speech correctly is subject to the BOP’s restrictions in the January 7, 2019 Order concerning Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW. That action has been finally adjudicated on the merits, as the court entered summary judgment, which was affirmed. Rivera, 88 F. Supp. 2d at 1141. Plaintiff was the plaintiff in that action and fully and fairly litigated the issues over nearly five years. See Case 1:19-cv-00752-LTB-GPG Document 8 Filed 05/01/19 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 11
Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW. Thus, I recommend that certain of Plaintiff’s free speech claims, specifically Claims 2, 5, 8, 13, 18, and 19, be dismissed with prejudice on the basis of issue preclusion.

III. Retaliation
"Prison officials may not retaliate against an inmate because of the inmate’s exercise of First Amendment rights." 2019 WL 117616, at *8 (citation omitted). As noted above, certain of Plaintiff’s First Amendment claims are barred by issue preclusion. Thus, retaliation based on these claims likewise fails. On this basis, I recommend that Claims 9 and 14 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to show that Plaintiff is entitled to relief as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

IV. Defamation

In Claim 22, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Matevousian stated in a letter to a United States Senator that "Creativity ‘advocates for violence motivated by racial discrimination,’ meaning to imply that Hale does likewise since he is an adherent of that religion." (ECF No. 1 at 26). Plaintiff contends this statement "was false and defamatory to Hale’s character, and was meant to prejudice Senator Duckworth against his person. Matevousian knew, or should have known, that the statement is untrue." (Id.).

The Court recommends that Claim 22 be dismissed with prejudice as legally frivolous. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915A requires a court to dismiss sua sponte a prisoner’ s action or claim at any time if it is frivolous. "[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). A legally frivolous claim is one based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, such as the alleged infringement of a legal interest that clearly does not exist. Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327. There is considerable overlap between the standards for frivolousness and failure to state a claim, and a claim that lacks an arguable basis in law is dismissible under both standards. Id. at 326, 328.
Colorado law governs Plaintiff’s state law defamation claim. "Defamation is a communication that holds an individual up to contempt or ridicule thereby causing him to incur injury or damage." Keohane v. Stewart, 882 P.2d 1293, 1297 (Colo. 1994). Defamation consists of two types of communication, libel (written communication) and slander (oral communication). See id. at n.5. The elements of defamation are (1) a defamatory statement concerning another; (2) published to a third party; (3) with fault amounting to at least negligence on the part of the publisher; and (4) either actionability of the statement irrespective of special damages or the existence of special damages to the plaintiff caused by the publication. See Larson v. Stow, 327 P.3d 340, 345 (Colo. App. 2014).

"A statement is defamatory if it tends to harm the reputation of another so as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him." Bustos v. A & E Television Networks, 646 F.3d 762, 763 (10th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). In Colorado, a plaintiff must "show the falsity of a defamatory statement by ‘clear and convincing evidence.’" Id. at 764 (citation omitted). "Minor inaccuracies do not amount to falsity so long as the substance, the gist, the sting, of the libelous charge be justified." Id. (quoting Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 517 (1991)).  
As recounted by the Tenth Circuit, Plaintiff "is serving a forty-year sentence for obstructing justice and soliciting the murder of a federal judge who entered a judgment against the church’s predecessor." 2019 WL 117616, at *1. The Tenth Circuit upheld the prison restrictions imposed against Plaintiff because of his adherence to Creativity, which is designated as a security threat "because inmates following its tenets have engaged in acts of violence, including murdering other inmates and instigating race riots." Id. The Tenth Circuit determined, "[t]here is overwhelming evidence in the record that Creativity poses an institutional security risk and that Mr. Hale has sought to advance the white-supremacist goals of Creativity in ways that pose a danger both inside and outside of ADX." Id. at *7. Thus, Defendant Matevousian’s allegedly defamatory statement is not defamatory because, in light of the Tenth Circuit’s findings, Plaintiff cannot show it is false. Because Claim 22 lacks an arguable basis in law, the Court recommends that it be dismissed with prejudice as legally frivolous.

V. Recommendation

For the reasons set forth herein, this Magistrate Judge respectfully
RECOMMENDS that Claims 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16, 17, 18, and 19 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the basis of issue preclusion. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Claims 9 and 14 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Claim 22 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as legally frivolous. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Claims 1, 10, 11, 12, 15, 20, and 21 be drawn to Senior Judge Marcia S. Krieger. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c), 40.1(d)(1); Hale v. Case 1:19-cv-00752-LTB-GPG Document 8 Filed 05/01/19 USDC Colorado Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al., Case No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW (final judgment entered March 29, 2018).

DATED at Grand Junction, Colorado, this 1st day of May, 2019.


Gordon P. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge


Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case)... Order Of Reference To United States Magistrate Judge


Civil Action No. 19-cv-00752-LTB-GPG




S. HANSEN, and


This action is under review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows:

(X) Perform duties set forth in D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1.

(X) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including all nondispositive motions and other requests seeking court action.

(X) Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, at the magistrate judge’s discretion.
(X) Submit recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions.

(X) Submit recommendations for disposition of all or part of this action as required under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and/or 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.

(X) Determine and resolve nondispositive post-judgment motions and other requests seeking court action.

IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional orders of reference are necessary. All motions, requests, letters, and any other document seeking court action are referred automatically for resolution or recommendation by the named magistrate judge.

DATED: May 1, 2019


s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court


Wednesday, 1 May 2019

About Liberty, Chaos and Organized Society....By Ben Klassen


Only in a well-organized White Society, structured for the protection and advancement of the best interests of the White Race, can we hope to survive and prosper.

In their Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Jews congratulate themselves that they have entrapped and enslaved more unsuspecting goyim with their catchwords of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity than any other concept. They further smirk unto themselves that each one of these words contradicts the others, and that none of these concepts are workable in the real world, yet by throwing them out to the mobs, the Jews brag that they have caused more turmoil, revolution and chaos than they have with any other deceptions in their multifarious bag of tricks. If this is so, and history amply confirms that It Is, let us take a close look and analyze these booby traps more closely.

The word "liberty" has had great appeal to the masses for ages. People want to be free and the words liberty and freedom are synonymous. How free is free? The word itself is an absolutism. To be free means you have no restrictions on your activities. As soon as there are restrictions on your activities and someone else can tell you what you can and cannot do, you are no longer "free," right? Yes, I would say that is a reasonable conclusion a logical person would arrive at. It also then follows that being free, such person has no obligations, no responsibilities, no duties, no rules, no guidelines, no laws they are bound to follow or obey.

It sounds great, from the Libertarian point of view.
Now let us get back to the real world. At what stage of life do we arrive at such an ideal state of milieu? As a three year old toddler? As a ten year old? A teenager? At 21? As a 30 year old parent? As a grandparent? When you are dead and laid to rest?
The fact is, at none of these. The toddler has any number of duties and obligations with which he must learn to cope. (For the sake of brevity, I use the word "he" throughout as also an alternative for the word "she," and the word "man" applies equally for the word "woman.") The toddler must by now be "potty trained," must learn a comprehensive vocabulary of new words, must learn table manners, must learn to keep himself and his clothes relatively clean, must learn obedience to his parents. The list is endless.

Many of these obligations and a passel of new ones extend on to the ten year old and the teenager. As an adult of 21 more duties and obligations are added to the list, such as having completed or continuing higher education, earning a living, planning on marriage, and a number of others. Parenthood involves even more. Parents must not only be able to establish and maintain a household, but must also have provided for a decent income, be a role model for their children, provide for their education, and a host of other very real obligations and responsibilities, many of which extend on into becoming grandparents.
Added on to all these are any number of civic duties, such as paying taxes, trying to keep the local, state and federal government in check, and dealing with such governments’ demands, whether we like it or not. After we are dead and buried, we still have some arduous responsibilities, not the least of which is having left a reputation and track record to which our children and grandchildren can point with pride. Also, before departing from this world grandparents have a responsibility to leave the environment, their country and their society in as good or better shape than when they entered. This they owe to their children, their grandchildren and their future progeny.

So, how free are we when we enter this world, when we leave it, and the time in between? The answer is only an irresponsible idiot would try to shuck all the obligations and responsibilities that are incumbent with living. But even try as he may, such individual is far from being "free." As a child he may try to rebel against authority, but it will avail him nothing. He will be chastised and he will be punished, and life will only be extremely difficult.

As an adult, he may try to ignore the responsibility of earning a living, but poverty and misery will be his lot. He can neglect the responsibility of supporting his family, but loneliness, isolation and guilt will be the consequence. He has the freedom to ignore, or even violate the law, but he will suffer the penalties of heavy fines and/or incarceration. Certainly, there will be no joys of "freedom," and liberty will not be his reward.

Let us now picture a scenario in a world about which Libertarians love to fantasize and eulogize, a world in which everyone is free to damn well do as the spirit moves them.

In such a world there are no traffic laws. You can zoom down the highway or the street of a residential neighborhood at 90 miles an hour. If it so tickles your fancy, you can also do this in the left lane any time you please. After all, nobody is going to tell you where or how you can drive, nor is anybody going to tell you that you have to have a driver’s license, nor a license plate on your car to identify the vehicle. How long, do you suppose, you would stay alive? Or even if you decided to comply with all the traffic rules, but the rest of the irresponsible yokels need not, how would you like to venture forth into traffic?

As a true Libertarian, you are also, of course, free to dump your garbage anywhere you please, such as on your neighbor’s lawn. On the other hand, there are certain drawbacks to this kind of liberty. Your neighbor is also free to dump his garbage on your lawn, and undoubtedly would do so in retaliation. He may also utilize his freedom to fire his gun in your direction.

A true Libertarian is also free from taxes, and to spend his money as only he pleases. This means that no roads, bridges or schools will be built, unless a congenial private group can get together and do so voluntarily. But, again, there are numerous disadvantages to this arrangement. By joining such a group you are thereby already surrendering some of your precious freedoms, of course, and then, too, there is the unpleasant likelihood that other freeloaders, who never contributed to your group, would also use your roads and bridges. There is also the difficulty that such roads would not connect with some other independent group’s arrangement and would go nowhere.
There would, of course, also be no schools, no government, no law enforcement agencies, and no laws. As such, there would also be no police protection from thieves, murderers and other criminals. It would be every man for himself. In fact, it would be utter chaos and anarchy, and let me point out that anarchy is the most cruel and tyrannical of all forms of government.
Do such situations exist in the world? Yes, most decidedly, and more and more countries of the world are drifting into despair and anarchy. We read about the various nigger "republics’ in Africa. In one single edition of a recent mainstream newspaper the present status of three such countries was described.
On the west coast of Africa there is Liberia, a country that was founded as early as 1822 by the United States to accommodate freed slaves. Its constitution was modeled after that of the U.S.A. In the intervening 168 years, how has Liberia fared?

As in most of these nigger republics, there Is a civil war going on, a war that has degenerated into brutal tribal slaughter that characterizes most of these "free" and "independent" states in Africa that can loosely be called countries. At war are the Nimba and the Krahn tribes, aided and abetted by the Gios and the Manos tribes. Added to this melee of mass murder and wholesale slaughter are the Americo-Liberian decedents of the early freed slaves from America.

On July 29, 1990, Liberian soldiers forced their way into St. Peter’s Lutheran Church, designated as a Red Cross Center, and slaughtered an estimated 700 displaced civilians. More were shot shortly thereafter at the John F. Kennedy hospital and elsewhere bringing the total casualties in one day to 1000, which constitutes only one fifth of the total in the war so far.
Former President Samuel Doe was slain in 1990, as was the former President William R. Tolbert, Jr. before him, in Doe’s succession to power. Anarchy, chaos, brutality and killing are the norm. More than 600,000 refugees, 20% of Liberia’s population, have fled the country from the devastations of this grisly war in the last 12 months alone.
Most of these refugees have fled to neighboring Guinea, the Ivory Coast and to Sierra Leone. How are these countries faring? Let us look at Sierra Leone, for instance.
In Freetown, the dilapidated capital, roads amount to no more than a maze of potholes, electricity shuts off daily, hospitals lack running water, and most telephones are for looks only. Corruption In government runs so deep that the International Monetary Fund (mostly funded by American taxpayer money) has finally shut off aid. In short, the country is in a state of anarchy, chaos, famine and corruption, as are almost all of the nigger republics of Africa.
Let us look at one more such republic more than a thousand miles to the east, in the heart of Africa.
Uganda has all the physical attributes of a beautiful, prosperous country, once described by Winston Churchill as ‘The Pearl of Africa." It has an ample supply of water and fertile land, and the climate is generally warm and sunny. Properly organized and developed, it could be one of the most prosperous and beautiful countries in the world.
There is one major problem. It is populated by niggers. The consequence is that Uganda is mired in poverty, wracked with hunger and starvation. During 17 of the last 21 years Ugandans have been agonizingly entangled in protracted civil war and anarchy. Young children walk around with bellies swollen from hunger, and from the effects of a host of worms and other intestinal parasites picked up from dirty drinking water. More than 700,000 civilians have been killed in the ongoing slaughter. Ugandan soldier-thugs have destroyed thousands of schools, looted clinics and hospitals, blasted roads, rail links and power stations, the handiwork of previous White Man’s contributions, into useless rubble.
This by no means encompasses the turmoil, anarchy, chaos and the proliferation of civil wars that are going on in the Dark Continent. In fact, it is no more than a thumbnail capsule of what is going on in the vast majority of these savage enclaves, but whereas this is not the place to summarize this huge conglomerate of brutality, mass murder, mayhem and insane savagery, here is a short summary as of 1990.

This Is a partial list of the African countries that were still in a state of war and rebellion in 1990, and the dates at which such ongoing wars started:

Uganda, 1969
Ethiopia, 1974
Angola, 1975
Mozambique, 1981
South Africa, 1983
Sudan, 1984
Somalia, 1988
Liberia, 1990, etc.
So much for the potential of trying to uplift the savage niggers to the levels of White civilization.
But Africa is not the only continent in turmoil. Even our ancestral homeland of Europe is disintegrating into a bedlam of anarchy. We find the Balkan countries, we find Rumania, Bulgaria and Hungary in a state of chaos, confusion and rebellion. We find Yugoslavia breaking up into ethnic entitles which want "independence," freedom from the central government. We find the great conglomerate of Russia, probably the world’s richest land area of natural resources, breaking up into floundering and confused independences, which, if and when they do become independent, cannot govern themselves, cannot organize themselves to feed and house their own people in a land of rich natural abundance. Yes, the Russian people are facing a dire winter of hunger and famine, even in the Ukraine, a rich area that as long as 80 years ago was considered the rich bread basket of Europe.

Yes, despite all of the technological advances of the last 50 years, most of the world is facing chaos and starvation. Not only in Africa, Russia and most of the formerly communist countries of Europe, but also in Central America, South America, and closer to home in the U.S.A., most of the major cities in our own country are wracked with crime, anarchy, unemployment and poverty. The fact is, as we approach the 21st century, the whole world, it seems, is going to hell in a hand basket.

What is wrong? Can the White Race be saved?

We Creators believe we have some cogent answers. In the first place, for a society to survive and prosper its whole foundation for such must be based on a sound and intelligent philosophy. This we have not been getting. The Jews, our deadliest enemies, have done everything possible to mislead and confuse the White Race.

The same Jewish conspiracy that tossed the catchwords of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity Into the French mobs 200 years ago and threw that advanced country into chaos, rebellion and anarchy, is still with us and at it today. It is still plying the same con game to most of the world, although the facade of the format has changed, seemingly. Today, with the Jews in firm control of the most powerful nation in the world, the United States of America, they are pushing democracy, American style, and pushing it down everyone’s throat, whether they like it or not. The fact that the Jews are putting so much fervor behind their promotion of democracy should in itself raise a red flag and alert us to its disastrous consequences.
What is wrong with democracy? Well, just about everything. The core of the problem is that, along with Christianity and Communism, it is a Jewish promotion that bodes ill for the White Race and is designed to converge more and more tyrannical power into the hands of the Jewish power establishment. Like Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, it is a Jewish fraud.

Here is how Jewish democracy," American style, works. Seemingly, the people are led to believe that because they are allowed to vote, they are governing themselves. Nothing could be further from the truth. Ask, for example, the Germans. For the last 40 years they have had democracy shoved down their throat. At the same time they have had some 300,000 American occupation troops on their soil, with another 300,000 or so Soviet occupation troops on East German soil. Now they have been allowed reunification, but most of the troops, after 45 years, are still there. In private, most of the Germans I have talked to have told me that the six peacetime years under National Socialism and Adolf Hitler were the finest, most prosperous and most glorious years in their history. Supposing they, both East and West Germany, wanted to vote in a Nazi government tomorrow. Under their "democracy," do you believe for a moment they would be allowed to do so? Not a chance of a snowball in hell. That is what the American and Russian troops, under Jewish control, are there to make sure never happens.
Things are not really much different in the United States Itself. With the money, the financial power, In the hands of the Jews, and the news media and the propaganda apparatus also In their hands, the Jews are able to operate their "divide and conquer" technique so expertly that the people never realize how effectively they are being fleeced, robbed, manipulated and enslaved. With the two-party system the Jews have all the necessary leverage they need to put their very own stooges into positions of government and keep out any meaningful opposition to their nefarious designs. As a result, we now have a president that is a toady, a chabez-goy, a stooge for the Jewish powerhouse. We have a congress that is completely at the mercy of the Jewish manipulators. This applies equally to our governors, our state houses, to City Hall and all the way down to the lowest level of local government.
Whereas the original Constitution strictly limited the powers of the Federal government, and reserved most of the rights (education, voting procedures, etc.) to the State governments, the Civil War of 1861-65 changed all that. The Federal government, taking advantage of the naked power of its armies, has ever since used brute force to override any and all rights the states had in all the areas proscribed in the constitutional agreement. Then, as now, the Federal government rode, and now rides, roughshod over any rights the states or the people have reserved unto themselves in the 9th and 10th Amendments. When in 1956 the State of Arkansas did not want niggers to enter into and louse up their High School at Little Rock, the Federal government, completely under Jewish control, sent down 10,000 troops to ram their fiat down the throats of the local citizens. When a few years later the University of Mississippi did not want a nigger enrolled in their college, the Federal government in short order deployed 20,000 Federal troops to force this one goddamned nigger into an institution where the local people did not want him, and had every constitutional right to reject him.

Being in full control of the propaganda apparatus, especially the electronic boob-tube, and having convinced us of the one-man one-vote virtues, we are daily being slopped with the claim of how free we are in America, that we are all equal, that we should accept the niggers, the Mexicans, the Indians, the Jamaicans, and a slew of other mud races as our brothers. (This is where the "Equality" and "Fraternity" dosage comes in.)
Meanwhile, the White Race, accepting all this Jewish propaganda as the "will of the majority," peacefully acquiesces. The White Americans are further told that it is their Christian duty to help the needy, and we must subsidize all these parasitic mud races at home and abroad, whether we like it or not. This is the essence of democracy, that great and magic Jewish concept.

Let us make one thing clear. We Creators are not talking about bigger government. On the contrary, we are for less government, not more. We envision a government that is smaller, imposes less, much less, in taxes, and interferes less with our lives. On the other hand, our kind of government, based on the White leadership principle, is more concerned with those duties a well-ordered government is properly constituted to perform in the first place. The first duty of such a government is to protect our life and property.

Secondarily, it would also provide those orderly facilities such as roads, bridges, harbors, airports, schools, law and order, coining of interest free money, and several other necessary accoutrements that are incumbent upon a prosperous and well constituted society. The big difference between the present parasitical Jew-dominated society and a Creator-oriented society is this: our kind of government will be based on the Leadership Principle, headed not by Jews, but our own White leaders whose overwhelming religious zeal is not to rob and destroy our White Race but to protect its integrity at all costs, and to work for the sole benefit of our own precious race. The primary goal of such government will be the survival, expansion and advancement of the White Race, and expunging the cancerous alien mud races from the body of our society.

Meanwhile the White Race is being mongrelized, decimated and destroyed in a deliberate war of genocide, not only in the United States, but on worldwide basis.
What can we do about it? Are we helpless to reverse the trend now fully set in motion?
The answer is: there is much we can do about it. In fact, we can solve the whole problem resolutely, once and for all time.

The first prerequisite we, the White Race, must have is a firm, positive and militant philosophy and program of our own. For too long we have been led around by the nose by our enemies, who have imposed treacherous, destructive, alien philosophies upon our thinking. Among the most invidious and deadly of these have been Christianity, Communism and Democracy, all of them of Jewish origin. Before we can take any meaningful constructive action, we must throw overboard into the trash heap of history those degenerative ideas the parasitic Jew has imposed upon the White Race. These include, besides Christianity, Communism and Democracy, the ideas of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. In their place we must instead promote those positive lessons that Nature has taught – ideas that were basic and valid from time immemorial and will be so unto all eternity. Some of these ideas are as follows.

Lessons of Nature for White Survival
1. We must recognize and separate our own biological species, our own precious White Race, from that of the mud races.
2. We must recognize our natural enemies, namely the mud races, of which the Jews are the most vicious, treacherous and deadly. DELENDA EST JUDAICA!
3. We must recognize that our most important mission in life is the survival, expansion and advancement of our own kind and that we must make the world safe, not for democracy, but for the future of our own progeny, for all time.
4. Instead of accepting and succumbing to sick and degenerative Jewish ideas such as Liberty, Equality and Fraternity; Christianity, Communism and Democracy; race mixing and the promotion and subsidization of the scum and the inferior mud races, we must have a complete revolution of those values we hold dear, values that are promulgated by the White Race, for the best Interests of the White Race and the White Race exclusively.

5. To do this, we must have a clear, consistent, comprehensive creed and program of our own, based on those values that are In our own best interests. Such a creed and program must embrace such key values as Racial Loyalty, White Racial Teamwork, Racial Purity, the Leadership Principle, the practice of eugenics and the upgrading of our racial species, and many other vital concepts as set forth in our own NATURES ETERNAL RELIGION, THE WHITE MAN’S BIBLE and other religious books of CREATIVITY.

6. We must realize that whether we like it or not, we, the White Race, are embroiled in a deadly racial war, a war not of our making, but contrived and orchestrated by the worldwide Jewish network. We are now in the precarious position of being exterminated, a crisis that is coming to a rapid climax. Unless the White Race soon becomes aware, aroused, organized and militant, we will soon be an extinct species.
7. We must also realize our own worth – that we are Nature’s Finest, and also we must recognize our own strength and resources. Aroused, united and organized the White Race is the most powerful force on the face of the earth.
8. We must realize that we cannot save all of humanity, and that we have no obligation to do so. We must get our priorities straight and save our own precious White Race in accordance with the principle of TRIAGE.(See R.L. No. 67.)    Triage.... By Ben Klassen
9. We must now muster and mobilize those forces we possess and wage an all out war to destroy our enemies and save the White Race from extinction. We must mobilize and polarize around one powerful, comprehensive and militant creed to save ourselves and our future progeny. That creed and program is Creativity and Creativity exclusively.
10. We must realize that we are now in a dire and crucial crisis in the life span of our race, and we must dedicate ourselves to winning this crucial battle for White survival at all costs, no matter what the price or the sacrifices required. We are Nature’s Finest, and in accordance with the Highest Law of Nature – survival of the species – we must and we will use any and all means to secure the survival of our species. The end (White survival) Justifies the means (any and all means deemed effective and necessary).

White People Awake!

Save the White Race!

Ben Klassen
Founder Church Of The Creator

                                APRIL 18AC(1991)