Rev Mac's introduction is at the 8:56 mark.
Sunday 31 January 2016
Rev James Mac Speaking at The London Forum....January 30th 2016
Listen to Rev James Mac speak at The London Forum on January 30th 2016. Rev Mac talks about Straightening Out The White Man's Thinking.
Rev Mac's introduction is at the 8:56 mark.
Rev Mac's introduction is at the 8:56 mark.
Friday 22 January 2016
The Creativity Perspective... 02/03/05..Narration by Rev James Mac
The Creativity Perspective 02. Straightening out the White Mans thinking.....Narration by Rev James Mac
The Creativity Perspective 03. The Little White Book Intro.
Narration by Rev James Mac
The Creativity Perspective 05. Avoid Burnout, enjoy the pro- White life. Narration by Rev James Mac
Wednesday 20 January 2016
TCM... Security Threat Group
U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
From Untied States Penitentiary
Administrative Maximum
P.O Box 8500
Florence CO 81226-8500
RE:
Hale, Matthew
Reg. No. 15177-424
SUBJECT: Correspondence with Inmate Returned.
Your correspondence to the above named inmate is being returned. This correspondence was not delivered to the inmate because:
Correspondence contains security threat group related information.
The rejection of this correspondence is in accordance with the Federal Bureau of Prisons policy on "correspondence" as published in Title 28/ code of Federal Regulations, Part 540 and in the Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement on correspondence. You have the right to appeal this rejection by writing the Warden in care of the above address. The inmate to whom you addressed your correspondence has been notified that this correspondence has been returned to you and of his or her right to appeal the rejection. Any inquiry concerning this rejection will need to be referred to the following address:
Federal Bureau of Prison, ATTN: FOIA, 320 First street, N.W Washington, D.C. 20534.
M. Carr, Associate Warden MC/dh
FREE MATT HALE!
Tuesday 19 January 2016
Friday 15 January 2016
Go Back to Europe!
Not too long ago when a White person would question the Demographic Genocide taking place in North America, the Zionist Cultural Marxists would of course scream, racist! They would also use the refrain... If you don't like it, GO BACK TO EUROPE! When was the last time that refrain was used by the Marxists? The encouragement of White People to G.B.T.E is out, it's now.. " The World will be a better place when the White People are gone" So, it's no longer just a case of if you don't want to be a part of the new order you are welcome to leave, it has morphed rather quickly into we want you dead!
Demographic Genocide (Metapedia)
Systematic White Genocide via Demographic displacement in Europe is occurring at a greater/more rapid scale than here in North America. The recent flood of invaders from Syria and N. Africa into Europe especially Germany, is a bold acceleration of that part of their White Genocide plan. If White People do not fight back now, most of Europe will be enveloped by the mud races. Europe is no longer a sanctuary for White People, they don't want a Land(s) for us to call our own therefore cannot tell us to "GO BACK TO EUROPE" the message now is..... Just die.
" Our beliefs are strongly reinforced by an overwhelming mass of substantiated evidence. They are based on the eternal Laws of Nature; they are based on the lessons and experience of history; furthermore; they are based on logic, common sense and reality, not myth and fantasy. No other religion can honestly make this claim." The Creativity Movement.
Lessons and experience from History. Europe is experiencing Demographic Genocide on a grand scale, the impact has been felt immediately. Murder/Rape/Thievery/ Terrorist attacks/Grooming gangs etc. New Years Eve in Cologne, Germany and other cities in Europe were introduced to an Arab rape "game" they call Taharush where a group of "Men" surround a Women during large events such as NYE celebrations then molest and rape them while the other "Men" stand guard on the perimeter acting as a wall in front of those who might try and help the victim. Is this "Cultural Enrichment"?
Egypt's sexual assault epidemic (Aljazeera 2013)
History does not have to be 50 or more years in the past to learn from it. Europe's recent history should be a dramatic warning for White people around the world, it is a preview of things to come. The days of "White flight" are coming to a quick end, those with the financial means will be able to survive in their lifetime by moving far away from the infested cities or be protected within their patrolled gated communities, those without the monetary means will be left behind to be swallowed up by the non White invaders.
Among those living in the gated communities are the ones who imposed/facilitated the Demographic displacement, these treacherous hypocrites preach "multiculturalism/diversity" yet they themselves will have no interaction with the trash they have imported, their offspring will not be forced to attend dangerous and sub-standard schools polluted with non Whites. Gated communities and distance from the cities are not sustainable and only serve as short term solutions. Where will their children take "flight" to? The invaders will eventually make their way to where White people have fled, the gated communities will be easily over taken. The option of going back to Europe no longer exists, the Mother and Father Lands are at this time in greater peril than the colonies.
The time has come for White fight and White separation or it will be White extinction.
For Natures Finest
Brother Smith
Jan 43AC (2016)
Demographic Genocide (Metapedia)
Systematic White Genocide via Demographic displacement in Europe is occurring at a greater/more rapid scale than here in North America. The recent flood of invaders from Syria and N. Africa into Europe especially Germany, is a bold acceleration of that part of their White Genocide plan. If White People do not fight back now, most of Europe will be enveloped by the mud races. Europe is no longer a sanctuary for White People, they don't want a Land(s) for us to call our own therefore cannot tell us to "GO BACK TO EUROPE" the message now is..... Just die.
" Our beliefs are strongly reinforced by an overwhelming mass of substantiated evidence. They are based on the eternal Laws of Nature; they are based on the lessons and experience of history; furthermore; they are based on logic, common sense and reality, not myth and fantasy. No other religion can honestly make this claim." The Creativity Movement.
Lessons and experience from History. Europe is experiencing Demographic Genocide on a grand scale, the impact has been felt immediately. Murder/Rape/Thievery/ Terrorist attacks/Grooming gangs etc. New Years Eve in Cologne, Germany and other cities in Europe were introduced to an Arab rape "game" they call Taharush where a group of "Men" surround a Women during large events such as NYE celebrations then molest and rape them while the other "Men" stand guard on the perimeter acting as a wall in front of those who might try and help the victim. Is this "Cultural Enrichment"?
Egypt's sexual assault epidemic (Aljazeera 2013)
History does not have to be 50 or more years in the past to learn from it. Europe's recent history should be a dramatic warning for White people around the world, it is a preview of things to come. The days of "White flight" are coming to a quick end, those with the financial means will be able to survive in their lifetime by moving far away from the infested cities or be protected within their patrolled gated communities, those without the monetary means will be left behind to be swallowed up by the non White invaders.
Among those living in the gated communities are the ones who imposed/facilitated the Demographic displacement, these treacherous hypocrites preach "multiculturalism/diversity" yet they themselves will have no interaction with the trash they have imported, their offspring will not be forced to attend dangerous and sub-standard schools polluted with non Whites. Gated communities and distance from the cities are not sustainable and only serve as short term solutions. Where will their children take "flight" to? The invaders will eventually make their way to where White people have fled, the gated communities will be easily over taken. The option of going back to Europe no longer exists, the Mother and Father Lands are at this time in greater peril than the colonies.
The time has come for White fight and White separation or it will be White extinction.
For Natures Finest
Brother Smith
Jan 43AC (2016)
Sunday 10 January 2016
Rev Matt Hale (Civil suit) Response to Defendents Motion for Entry of Protective Order
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW
REVEREND MATT HALE,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Protective Order (docket no. 75) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The written Protective Order (docket no. 75-1) is APPROVED and made an Order of Court.
Date: December 17, 2015
*********************************************************************************
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW
REVEREND MATT HALE,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
PLANTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC 75)
Plaintiff Reverend Matt Hale ( Hereafter "Hale") , opposes the defendant's motion on numerous grounds, stating as follows:
The first reason why the Defendant's motion should be denied is that it fails to meet the standard for the issuance of a protective order as provided by Fed. R. Civ. (P.26 cc) which states as follows in clear and unambiguous terms :
" The Court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense..."
Here, since the Defendant and it's employees are Government actors, Hale denies that there is or ever could be " good cause" to "protect" their activity's from the scrutiny of the general public, nor does the Defendant provide any support at all in it's motion for the proposition that a protective order is necessary to protect it and it's employees "from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense" within the context of this case. The fact that this case is presently being discussed on a website ( Motion at 2 ) is simply not sufficient to meet the "annoyance, embarrassment", or "oppression" standard, nor is there even remotely a concern here that the Defendant and it's employees may suffer " undue burden or expense", by virtue of the public dissemination of the details of this case on that website or anywhere else amongst the general public.
Second, and related to the above, is that the Defendant has provided no basis at all for the proposition that Government agencies and employees, in the performance of their duties, should be allowed to keep those activities secret from the scrutiny of the general public. No case law is provided, nor suggested, by the Defendant on that point. It is, after all, the Government of the United States that is suppose to serve the people in this country, not the other way around. Accordingly, there is far less of a justification for the issuance of a protective order when it is the activities of the Government and it's employees that are at issue. Open Government, not secrecy, is the hallmark of the republican form of Government and this court should frown on the issuance of a protective order accordingly, here.
Third, the Defendant does not bother to explain the utility of a protective order in this case when "information that may implicate prison security and safety, the safety of persons both within and outside the prison, law enforcement techniques or investigations, and other sensitive personal information" (Motion at 3 ) will, at least in part, almost certainly be coming out at trial. Obviously that trial will, in turn, be public record notwithstanding the issuance of any protective order. It is furthermore likely that a fair number of Hale's supporters, as well as the news media, will be present at that trial and that the transcript of it will also eventually be posted at the Free Matt Hale website along with other documents pertaining to this case that the defendant mentions in it's motion are already there ( Motion 2 ). Hence a protective order seems to make little sense because, in effect, the information in question will eventually be aired to the public all the same.
Fourth, other than the Defendant's usual reminder to the court that Hale was convicted of a crime more than 11 years ago, the Defendant's motion is singularly lacking in any basis that the dissemination of the discovery in this case poses a threat to the B.O.P and it's employees of " annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression" - the actual language of the rule - or that Hale and his supposed " followers" would, as a result of the dissemination of that discovery, pose any other threat to the Defendant and it's employees that isn't listed in the rule. In other words, the Defendant provides no connection at all between Hale's more than 11 year old conviction and the ( actual) purpose of the rule. The fact that Hale has supporters (not " followers") is simply not enough, standing alone, to justify the issuance of a protective order in this case, and as for the Defendant's citation of the United States v. White, 698 F. 3D 1005 ( 7th Cir. 2012 ), that is totally improper since White is not a "follower" of Hale, nor even an adherent of the Creativity religion, nor at liberty to receive any communications from Hale since he himself is imprisoned. Furthermore, the evidence against White was weak in the extreme as reflected by the fact that the case against him was thrown out twice by the trial court.
It is likewise improper that the Defendant cites the sixteen year old shooting spree of Benjamin Smith, quoting what Hale said at his funeral service, since, as Hale will prove at the trial, Smith was not a follower of Hale either and Hale was praising Smith for having passed out religious literature, not his alleged crimes as the Defendant insinuates.
Hale can understand why the defence council is not presently aware of these facts concerning White and Smith but they are indeed facts all the same and will be proven by discovery and at trial in short order. Thus Hale objects to the issuance of a protective order in this case on the basis of anything having to do with White or Smith. There is, simply put, no record of any " Follower" of Hale having ever committed a crime, on behalf of Hale or otherwise, or of Hale having ever praised same. Hale praised Smith for passing out the literature of his Church, not violence. That distinction is obviously a meaningful one. There is no evidence that Hale had anything to do with Smith's or White's alleged crimes, no evidence that they "followed" him by committing them, and no support therefore for a protective order on such grounds.
Finally, while the Defendant points out that there is a Free Matt Hale website, it conveniently fails to mention why that website exists: that Hale maintains his innocence of having committed any crime. That is why a Free Matt Hale website exists in the first place. It is a website devoted to the freeing of an innocent man, not a guilty one. Thus again, there is no connection between the fact that there is a website that supports Hale and any kind of basis for the issuance of a protective order in this case. People support Hale because he is innocent, not guilty. Yes, people care about Hale but that, standing alone as it does here, is insufficient to justify the issuance of a protective order. There is no reason to believe that Hale, who maintains his innocence, and who in fact has proven his innocence of having committed any crime in the first place ( See again Amended Complaint, Doc. 10 at para 24 ) , would then turn around and seek to enlist his supporters to " annoy, embarrass, or oppress" the Defendant and it's employees with the discovery produced in this case, or that they would take that upon themselves on their own. Hale is law abiding person, has always been, and has always expected his supporters to compart themselves the same way. As such, he naturally opposes any suggestion to the contrary such as a protective order would evoke. The Defendant provides no basis whatever for the proposition that he would behave unethically in this case, nor will he. While his legal career and rightful freedom may well have been wrongly denied him in the past and hideously so at that, that does not mean that his character should continue to be maligned in the manner the Defendant suggests with its motion. In sum, if a protective order would not issue were Hale a free person suing the B.O.P, it should not issue here either. The mere fact that he was unfortunately convicted of a crime is not enough.
" The courts have insisted on a particular and specific demonstration of fact, as distinguished from stereotyped and conclusory statements, in order to establish good cause ' for the issuance of a protective order. Sansom v. Milyard, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154423 ( D. Colo. June 13, 2011 (emphasis added) , quoting Charles A. Wright and Arthur Miller, Fed. Practice and Pro. ( Civ.) sec. 2035 n.39. " Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cc ), a party must demonstrate " good cause" for entry of a protective order. Conclusory or stereotypical assertions are insufficient to show good cause. " Exum v. United States Olympic Comm. 209. F.R.D 201, 206 ( D. Colo. 2002 ) ( emphasis added ) " Instead the party seeking a protective order must show that disclosure will result in a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking protection." Id ( emphasis added ) The Defendant has not even remotely met this high burden. Instead, all it does is make conclusory and stereotypical assertions, at best.
Saying that a protective order is necessary here because Hale was convicted of a crime and has supporters - as the Defendant does - falls within the very kind of conclusory and stereotypical assertions that are insufficient as a matter of law for the issuance of such an order.
For all of the above reasons, the Defendant's motion for Entry of Protective Order ( Doc. 75 ) should be denied.
Respectfully Submitted,
Reverend Matt Hale
Plaintiff
December 4th, 2015
Rev. Matt Hale # 15177-424
U.S Penitentiary MAX
PO Box 8500
Florence, Colorado 81226
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW
REVEREND MATT HALE,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Protective Order (docket no. 75) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The written Protective Order (docket no. 75-1) is APPROVED and made an Order of Court.
Date: December 17, 2015
*********************************************************************************
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW
REVEREND MATT HALE,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
PLANTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC 75)
Plaintiff Reverend Matt Hale ( Hereafter "Hale") , opposes the defendant's motion on numerous grounds, stating as follows:
The first reason why the Defendant's motion should be denied is that it fails to meet the standard for the issuance of a protective order as provided by Fed. R. Civ. (P.26 cc) which states as follows in clear and unambiguous terms :
" The Court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense..."
Here, since the Defendant and it's employees are Government actors, Hale denies that there is or ever could be " good cause" to "protect" their activity's from the scrutiny of the general public, nor does the Defendant provide any support at all in it's motion for the proposition that a protective order is necessary to protect it and it's employees "from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense" within the context of this case. The fact that this case is presently being discussed on a website ( Motion at 2 ) is simply not sufficient to meet the "annoyance, embarrassment", or "oppression" standard, nor is there even remotely a concern here that the Defendant and it's employees may suffer " undue burden or expense", by virtue of the public dissemination of the details of this case on that website or anywhere else amongst the general public.
Second, and related to the above, is that the Defendant has provided no basis at all for the proposition that Government agencies and employees, in the performance of their duties, should be allowed to keep those activities secret from the scrutiny of the general public. No case law is provided, nor suggested, by the Defendant on that point. It is, after all, the Government of the United States that is suppose to serve the people in this country, not the other way around. Accordingly, there is far less of a justification for the issuance of a protective order when it is the activities of the Government and it's employees that are at issue. Open Government, not secrecy, is the hallmark of the republican form of Government and this court should frown on the issuance of a protective order accordingly, here.
Third, the Defendant does not bother to explain the utility of a protective order in this case when "information that may implicate prison security and safety, the safety of persons both within and outside the prison, law enforcement techniques or investigations, and other sensitive personal information" (Motion at 3 ) will, at least in part, almost certainly be coming out at trial. Obviously that trial will, in turn, be public record notwithstanding the issuance of any protective order. It is furthermore likely that a fair number of Hale's supporters, as well as the news media, will be present at that trial and that the transcript of it will also eventually be posted at the Free Matt Hale website along with other documents pertaining to this case that the defendant mentions in it's motion are already there ( Motion 2 ). Hence a protective order seems to make little sense because, in effect, the information in question will eventually be aired to the public all the same.
Fourth, other than the Defendant's usual reminder to the court that Hale was convicted of a crime more than 11 years ago, the Defendant's motion is singularly lacking in any basis that the dissemination of the discovery in this case poses a threat to the B.O.P and it's employees of " annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression" - the actual language of the rule - or that Hale and his supposed " followers" would, as a result of the dissemination of that discovery, pose any other threat to the Defendant and it's employees that isn't listed in the rule. In other words, the Defendant provides no connection at all between Hale's more than 11 year old conviction and the ( actual) purpose of the rule. The fact that Hale has supporters (not " followers") is simply not enough, standing alone, to justify the issuance of a protective order in this case, and as for the Defendant's citation of the United States v. White, 698 F. 3D 1005 ( 7th Cir. 2012 ), that is totally improper since White is not a "follower" of Hale, nor even an adherent of the Creativity religion, nor at liberty to receive any communications from Hale since he himself is imprisoned. Furthermore, the evidence against White was weak in the extreme as reflected by the fact that the case against him was thrown out twice by the trial court.
It is likewise improper that the Defendant cites the sixteen year old shooting spree of Benjamin Smith, quoting what Hale said at his funeral service, since, as Hale will prove at the trial, Smith was not a follower of Hale either and Hale was praising Smith for having passed out religious literature, not his alleged crimes as the Defendant insinuates.
Hale can understand why the defence council is not presently aware of these facts concerning White and Smith but they are indeed facts all the same and will be proven by discovery and at trial in short order. Thus Hale objects to the issuance of a protective order in this case on the basis of anything having to do with White or Smith. There is, simply put, no record of any " Follower" of Hale having ever committed a crime, on behalf of Hale or otherwise, or of Hale having ever praised same. Hale praised Smith for passing out the literature of his Church, not violence. That distinction is obviously a meaningful one. There is no evidence that Hale had anything to do with Smith's or White's alleged crimes, no evidence that they "followed" him by committing them, and no support therefore for a protective order on such grounds.
Finally, while the Defendant points out that there is a Free Matt Hale website, it conveniently fails to mention why that website exists: that Hale maintains his innocence of having committed any crime. That is why a Free Matt Hale website exists in the first place. It is a website devoted to the freeing of an innocent man, not a guilty one. Thus again, there is no connection between the fact that there is a website that supports Hale and any kind of basis for the issuance of a protective order in this case. People support Hale because he is innocent, not guilty. Yes, people care about Hale but that, standing alone as it does here, is insufficient to justify the issuance of a protective order. There is no reason to believe that Hale, who maintains his innocence, and who in fact has proven his innocence of having committed any crime in the first place ( See again Amended Complaint, Doc. 10 at para 24 ) , would then turn around and seek to enlist his supporters to " annoy, embarrass, or oppress" the Defendant and it's employees with the discovery produced in this case, or that they would take that upon themselves on their own. Hale is law abiding person, has always been, and has always expected his supporters to compart themselves the same way. As such, he naturally opposes any suggestion to the contrary such as a protective order would evoke. The Defendant provides no basis whatever for the proposition that he would behave unethically in this case, nor will he. While his legal career and rightful freedom may well have been wrongly denied him in the past and hideously so at that, that does not mean that his character should continue to be maligned in the manner the Defendant suggests with its motion. In sum, if a protective order would not issue were Hale a free person suing the B.O.P, it should not issue here either. The mere fact that he was unfortunately convicted of a crime is not enough.
" The courts have insisted on a particular and specific demonstration of fact, as distinguished from stereotyped and conclusory statements, in order to establish good cause ' for the issuance of a protective order. Sansom v. Milyard, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154423 ( D. Colo. June 13, 2011 (emphasis added) , quoting Charles A. Wright and Arthur Miller, Fed. Practice and Pro. ( Civ.) sec. 2035 n.39. " Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cc ), a party must demonstrate " good cause" for entry of a protective order. Conclusory or stereotypical assertions are insufficient to show good cause. " Exum v. United States Olympic Comm. 209. F.R.D 201, 206 ( D. Colo. 2002 ) ( emphasis added ) " Instead the party seeking a protective order must show that disclosure will result in a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking protection." Id ( emphasis added ) The Defendant has not even remotely met this high burden. Instead, all it does is make conclusory and stereotypical assertions, at best.
Saying that a protective order is necessary here because Hale was convicted of a crime and has supporters - as the Defendant does - falls within the very kind of conclusory and stereotypical assertions that are insufficient as a matter of law for the issuance of such an order.
For all of the above reasons, the Defendant's motion for Entry of Protective Order ( Doc. 75 ) should be denied.
Respectfully Submitted,
Reverend Matt Hale
Plaintiff
December 4th, 2015
Rev. Matt Hale # 15177-424
U.S Penitentiary MAX
PO Box 8500
Florence, Colorado 81226
Saturday 9 January 2016
COINTELPRO, Tactics of our Enemy and the Blind Within...By Rev Logsdon
Ok, first brothers and sisters I will not go into the entire story and history of COINTELPRO as it is quite extensive. But it is a program that is still very active and the MAIN reason for the failure of the pro White cause. Far beyond any other reason and many do not know or simply minimalize its effects on our cause. It is also wrote off by many as a conspiracy theory. When the facts and proof of its active existence is far more prevalent today then ever before.
Follow me through this little journey and I will show you who, when, where and how to combat it. This is a journey I could compile in a 700 plus page book, but for the sake of time and attention I will simplify it as best I can. As I said the entire history of COINTELPRO is far beyond a simple article so for those wanting more extensive research visit the following websites.
Public eye... COINTELPRO
Wikipedia.....COINTELPRO
I was inspired to write this article after I tried doing a simple radio show the night before writing this and I couldn't even get 5 minutes into it without a cadre of agitators trolling saying many childish things. Name calling, ridiculous, unfounded, uneducated accusations.
Rev Logsdon Hosts Black and Silver Solution Radio Jan 2016
Most of us write these very typical things off as the everyday drama of the pro White cause, however. As childish or petty as these things are, they are planned tactical attacks, in most cases anyway. Some are just plain idiotic. I am not saying every single person engaging these things are a part of a bigger grandiose conspiracy. To the contrary, most who do these things are completely oblivious to their actions being manipulated by those who have the greater purpose and agenda. They are simply tools.
In a perfect world and maybe in a more broke down chaotic world they would be pulled from their homes, exposed, ousted and then ultimately executed in the streets like the despicable, cowardly dogs they are. Because unlike those who's natural purpose is to seek our destruction, namely the Jews, these people have been exposed to the truths and double standards. They have educated themselves upon them, lived upon its philosophies and principles (at least on the surface). Yet they CHOOSE to side with our enemies plan for our destruction. There my friends is the big difference. You can predict and foresee your natural enemies purpose and tactics. But when they use our own against us it is hard to counter or predict.
Imagine this scenario. A pack of wolves are in the forest, they stumble upon the scent of a deer. They track it, then they follow it. They eventually find said deer. Now the Alpha, a seasoned hunter leads the pack, he stalks the deer. You see he knows from his education and history exactly what direction the deer will run, what he will do. So the kill is a complete certainty. What he doesn't know is that the head Beta is secretly working with the deer. (this is a scenario people so bear with me). Why the Beta is working with the deer against his own pack is only ones guess as he will not expose himself. Maybe the Beta has a desire to be the Alpha of the pack, but cannot take him out on his own, so he teams up with the deer to accomplish his goals. Maybe he has hatred and animosity for the Alpha and just wants to see him fail, because the Alpha succeeded where he could not. Hell, maybe he just hates his fellow wolf kind. But either way he seeks only his own selfish purposes over the survival, expansion and advancement of his own kind.
As the Alpha goes to make his move towards the deer, the Beta comes up on his side and bites the Alpha right in the jugular. This weakens the Alpha and before he can turn around and kill his lesser to show his dominance the other wolves see his weakness. Now his weakness was not that he could be bested by the Beta, to the contrary, he has done so in many ways previously. That is way he has continued so long as the Alpha of the pack. But it was his failure to recognise the traitor beside him who seeks his own glory and purpose. This however does not matter to the rest of the pack. All they see is weakness and failure.
An internal power struggle ensues and wolf turns on wolf. In some cases the Beta might succeed, he kills the Alpha and takes his throne. But he won only through deceit and in a time of deceit he will end with the same fate. But in most cases, as this, the wolves continue to turn on one another. In an eternal power struggle that ultimately leads to the destruction of the pack. Meanwhile the deer goes on being a deer and is the only real winner. Morale of the story is that the wolves can only be defeated from within. As in the case of our people, our racial enemies cannot compete with us when we are united through honor. Our enemy knows this and has for years. Can we ever not turn on each other? That will remain to be seen, but for now let me get back to the subject at hand.
I think or better yet hope you all understand the point I made above because it is very similar to the eternal power struggles within this cause and the deliberate actions by many. But anyway lets move on to our next example, the methods of COINTELPRO. Because you must recognise your enemy and his actions.
Method 1: Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
THE MAIN PURPOSE WAS TO DISCREDIT AND DISRUPT!!! THEIR VERY PRESENCE SERVED TO UNDERMINE TRUST AND SCARE OFF POTENTIAL SUPPORTERS "TO SMEAR GENUINE ACTIVISTS AS AGENTS"!!!!
Sound familiar? Now see in this recent issue, speaking of the radio show and agitators. As I said these men we had no contact with. We/I don't seek them out on social media, we don't call/text harass them. We don't talk about them. In fact we actively seek to avoid them because we don't agree with their tactics, their attitudes or just generally don't like them. But they seek us out, stalk us, talk about us, etc. Are you starting to get it??? Now as I said not all of these people are intentionally working against us but being used by others. Here is an example:
Now I will never mention people or organizations by name as if I give them any validation for their actions then they know they are doing their job and it gives them the attention they so desperately seek.
But for prosperity purposes lets call subject/agent A Will Doper and subject/agent B Ben Dicklack.
Now lets take these two individuals but with their own separate purposes and tactics. More then likely oblivious to each others own involvement with, well whoever they are working with. Odds are in the employment/services of one of the two organizations I mentioned before, the SPLC or ADL. These are just the two biggest org's who work towards our failures, two of many. But we will stick with them for now. These two find a common cause and can use and manipulate each other for their own purposes, while they don't conflict. Which they will eventually, either they go their separate ways or they will turn on each other.
But for now they have solidarity on a common field. Lets start with subject A Will Doper. Now this individual for whatever purpose like I talked about above. He first cannot simply come out and slander people. Because then it will be very apparent to all that he just wants to start problems. So he has to make a name for himself. He is a physical coward and knows he cant earn a reputation through his prowess or manly hood. That he cant earn his place by gaining the respect of his fellow men through honor or loyalty like a brotherhood. No, he goes the route many cowardly men have gone. Through politics. They act as intellectuals, as that men should follow them because they know what's best. Men like this are articulate and intelligent and can easily manipulate the minds of unexperienced and uneducated people. This Doper will go from one political org to another. Doing his best to disrupt, discredit and destroy it in his process. His history has always ended in failure. Whether organizational wise, even in his personal life. His greed for whatever his overall purpose is overwhelming. But during his tenures with these orgs he will use them as platforms to cause dissension with his host org and others. Through his stature as an intellectual/political leader within it. Boasting "well I am the blah, blah of this". He will even put himself in harms way at times, it serves the purpose to legitimize himself to others. Who knows Mr. Doper here may believe he can be the grand poo bah to lead his people to victory. But by this alone he cannot achieve his goals, he must also tear others down to rise himself above them. I talked about it in another article.
Yertle the Turtle... By Rev Logsdon
But his political actions are one of failure as well, but earn respect from those that don't know its failures. Let me go off track a little and explain. For the past nearly 30 years men in our cause have tried to organize and protest against a corrupt system. Standing behind police barricades because they are so outnumbered. Giving speeches to communists who don't give a damn what you have to say, all for the sake of bad media publicity. But lets go a step further in the example. A certain neo Nazi organization here in the states uses the system to the T. They choose a city, usually that suffered from a racial issue and plan an event. They do so far in advance that way they can promote it an advertise for it. They make sure everyone knows about it even anti racists groups. The always liberal media gets a hold of it. They run articles on it stirring fear "neo-Nazis plan to march". Then they interview usually a member of the SPLC or like minded group. They portray them as the hero's fighting against the evil racists. So when every blind liberal White in the area reads the paper they see the good guy (SPLC) and the bad guy (White racists).
In most cases the paper will put the SPLC's contact so all these people say "oh my the Nazi's are coming to town? let me help these nice folks who are fighting against them". Last time I personally spoke to the leader of said neo Nazi org I told him I would love to see the financial spreadsheet of the SPLC every time you do a rally because I guarantee it is the main reason they are able to be so well funded! But bad media publicity, financial gain of anti's isn't the only negative about these actions. Any regular non movement White person who is fed up about our racial strife will look at the men out there and not want a damn thing to do with the pro White cause! The common rabble, not the speakers are usually the bottom barrel of our kin, with nothing better to do but join others in lashing out at the system.
Then the FBI will document the event, creating profiles on each attendee and use it to justify further surveillance and harassment. I can go on. But I speak from experience! I was one of those fools who believed I was making a difference and taking a stand. I gave more public speeches then most of these people ever will. I travelled all over the country, spending all my money doing so. It wasn't until I gave my last speech in Toledo that I looked out at the crowd of screaming anti's and asked myself "what are we accomplishing here?". Then I started seeing all the massive holes in the tactic. I never did it again and never will. If I speak again and I have and will but only to MY people and only to inspire THEM, not to agitate non whites and serve our enemies interests!!!
But back to Subject A. Him and others like him use this pointless method to legitimize themselves. While there are those that really think as I did, that they are making a difference the reality is that it does not serve the pro White mission. Only when the community as a whole stands up with you will it work. As in Poland for example. When we do it we get what 40 to 50 people tops. They get thousands! But subject A does not care about "making a difference" he just wants to serve his purpose. Without the concern of the damage it may cause. He gains his little following of uneducated and unexperienced through his exploits of the above. Once he has their command as a puppet master he pits them against those he wants to tear down.
Now before I go into the poor fools who follow let me first jump to example B, Ben Dicklack. Now this person, being oblivious or apathetic to being used by example A will allow so to serve also his purpose. He is a more common breed in todays movement. He uses the internet, radio and Youtube to promote himself and at the same time to discredit and slander others. He legitimizes himself through campaigns and fundraisers. Sometime for the very same purpose of example A. With taking his own cut I am sure. Starting to see how this little circle jerk works?
He will provide a platform for his own agenda, example A's agenda or anyone who they can use to attack those they seek to undermine. He will get a cult following by seeming tough, hard nose, no nonsense, controversial attitude. He will make grandiose claims and constantly build up his own mystique. In many cases, beings he is not a "public" person as our example A because he may being trying to maintain a normal life outside his manipulations in the pro white cause. This means usually example B's actual purpose more then likely isn't for self grandiose entitlement but more simple. Financial, or hate and animosity. But he may take on a false persona, fake name. Let us say in example B's case he may use the name Melvin Marris. Either way just as damaging. Now he will rile up his cult following, he will get them to attack others via internet, radio, phone or text. He will convince them just as example A does that those they wish to tear down are the REAL racial enemy and that they are the salvation. Convincing them that those they attack are secretly working with "ZOG" or the enemy. Remember method 1?
Now both parties will try to remain hands off most of the time sending their blind followers in harms way. But in the rare circumstances they will befriend their enemies in order to try to break down from within. Turning brother against brother or as my example story dictates wolf against wolf.
These blind followers as oblivious to what they do are far from being guilt free in the greater scheme of things. These people are usually lost individuals. They like many who join the movement, never really fit in anywhere. Growing up in school they didn't fit in with the cool kids, the jocks, the nerds, etc. They were essentially unimportant. Then when they find the pro White movement they find it easily excepting. It, the pro White cause, has always been desperate for numbers. Especially in such bleak times. So it sacrifices quality, integrity, honor and loyalty. All for the sake of a facade of support. Usually when things get REAL these people tuck tail and run or they find some other cause to attach themselves to. Why do you think you see so many jump back and forth from pro White to anti White? There's your answer.
However these minions of agents will follow blindly because they feel a part of something, they feel friendship. But it never lasts. Because they don't realize example A and B are only using them to serve their agenda. That's why both parties cannot keep people in their life long. Whether it be from their peers, their minions, and even their significant others in their personal life. They themselves follow blindly seeking their agenda, lying, manipulating, stealing and hurting anything or anyone in their path never finding true victory because they themselves are being used. Like the Beta male they will destroy themselves to accomplish their goal. While their masters are the true winners.
So lets sum up here by once again letting method 1 speak for its self:
Method 1: Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
Whether they do it for money, personal gain, hate or animosity. There it is and we let them win when we engage with them. When we feed into them, it gives them and ONLY them the power. Because it creates chaos or to use a more common pro White term "DRAMA". We can clearly combat this, never end it but at least take their power away. But first let me finish up with the other COINTELPRO methods and the difference/similarities between them.
2. Psychological Warfare From the Outside: The FBI and police used a myriad of other "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble for activists.
I have personally had this done to me and The Creativity Movement. Two summers ago I awoke, got a cup of coffee and went over to check my phone. To my shock I had 19 voicemails. Well, being used to harassment I figured it was some anti, calling over and over. But no it was all separate threatening voicemails. I checked the miss calls and the majority of them all came from the same number. So I called it back. It was the St Clair county hospital in Port Huron. So I told the receptionist that I received multiple harassing numbers from their hospital and she forwarded me off to the administrator. The phone call at first was very angry and threatening. I stopped her and said "look lady I don't know what the HELL your talking about." she calmed down and told me that someone had made up a flyer with a picture of black people hanging from a tree with the underneath caption. "save the white race, kill all non whites now!" Beneath it said "contact Rev James Logsdon" with my cell and home address following.
This happened multiple times in different locations. I found out who and where it came from. One disgruntled person and his mother were doing it. This person was upset with me as I refused his membership in TCM. Based on, well after this, accurate assumptions. They even put over a hundred in peoples mailboxes, which is a federal offense. I had to have a long talk with the St Clair county Sheriff Even though I knew the persons name, I never revealed it them. Instead we just told him very politely to stop it or we would have no choice.
We had over a dozen situations like this over the years. One person actually put out flyers with a picture of a celebrity and her family on the back. You imagine me shaking my head after I had to talk to Brooke Shields and her attorney!!! In which thankfully they didn't sue because in this case it was an actual previous disgruntled member. But these issues I don't believe were deliberate actions from the powers to be or anyone working with them. Just similar tactics of psychological cowardly warfare. Subconscious servitude.
"SET UP PSUEDO MOVEMENT GROUPS RUN BY GOVERMENT AGENTS".
Well, friends if you did your research with the links I provided above, you would know how much this is REAL and not just conspiracy. ENTIRE ORGANIZATIONS!!! Ill just let you think about that one.
The rest of that method is as self explanatory and up to this point I think you get it and have seen situations similar to this.
3. Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters.
Well I know many of us have experienced this. The FBI for years used this as scare tactics to chase people off. It worked and saved them from applying the previous ones. But with the new age and much more people coming into the cause, budget cuts due to a failing political and financial institutions, they are stretched too thin to apply these to everyone they would like to. So instead they apply #1. They also make examples of leaders within this movement. The SPLC does it through lawsuits. Taking away the financial opportunities both property and money. Example, Metzger, Edwards. They even tried it against TCM founder PME Klassen that later trickled down to William Pierce. If you become to much of a threat and are not phased or damaged by the first two then we have seen they will eliminate you through the corrupt legal system. Prime example PME Rev Matt Hale. I have experienced enough of this to write a series of books on! But lets move on to the last.
Method.4. Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten dissidents and disrupt their movements. In the case of radical Black and Puerto Rican activists (and later Native Americans), these attacks—including political assassinations—were so extensive, vicious, and calculated that they can accurately be termed a form of official "terrorism."
Now here is the rub and the BIG difference between those COINTELPRO agents that work for the SPLC, ADL etc., and those who work for Government agencies. This is a much older tactic that was prevalent back between the 50's 60's and 70's, even into the 80's. Back then then the media was easier to control, manipulate and threaten into submission. There was no internet, bloggers or Youtube. They had agents kill in order to prove themselves to leaders of the orgs they were trying to infiltrate. You see an actual FBI or one working for them or other Government agency have the protection of the court. The SPLC, ADL and others can pay agents, provide them with intel, send others to back them and help them in their endeavors. However they have no control or manipulation over the court system. That's the feds jurisdiction and as much as they help each other out they wont risk their careers to serve their personal plans, unless they are the same.
So the COINTELPRO agents outside the government are not going to do much more then techno terrorize. They wont meet up when challenged as we have seen many times, they wont follow through on any of their threats or do A DAMN THING. It is only a facade that has power through our responses. Our anger and frustrations, the chaos I told you they seek!
As this last method is not in use, at least as far as we know, that's not to say it wont again. It will be used as a last ditch effort. As they probably don't want to or have the need right now. Down the road their may be men who enter organizations. They are gonna be tough men, mean men. Willing to drive halfway across the country to crack the skull of someone who the leaders want them to. Hell, it could even be one of the agents of the previous methods. Whatever they have to do to prove themselves within the ranks. And when the times is right they will instigate dissension within. Many times by using the previous methods.
Now how to combat this. Well lets first simplify it.
Step 1. Recognition.
You can see by someone's history, pattern and actions. Going out of their way to make themselves seem better through comparisons to those they want to tear down. Obsessive attitudes. Any normal man wont get too bent out of shape over another man they have never met for very little reason. Just based off the assumptions of things they are told or read online. Use common sense, not paranoia. If they act too serious over petty things usually there are hidden reasons or agendas. If they actively seek out your friends only to turn them against you, etc.
Step 2. Avoidance.
There platform is based upon your response. The banter is what creates the internal chaos they seek. Everyone fighting amongst themselves instead of against the real enemy. Remember the wolves? And the deer runs away. You must simply not engage them in ANY WAY! They will bait you, provoke you, lie on you and smear your name. They will say the nastiest things. Still do not engage. It is the upon the life of lies the coward reigns supreme. Social media, even when they prank call and text. This is not real life but the facade of it. Or at least it shouldn't be your life. It is the bait to anger you, frustrate you and distract you away from what you should be focussing on. The real enemy, your racial enemy!
Step 3. Record, observe and remember.
It will be the most difficult task and maybe not one for the thin skinned. You will see what they say about you, your friends and brothers. Keep a record of it for later if you wish, it may be used to expose those who seek to infiltrate within. Keep track of the players, remember and if they do flock away from their safety bubbles treat is such. Real men don't threaten they act. Remain silent until you see the white of their beady eyes, then black them. Show them if they venture out from their cowardly platform they will be held accountable for their actions!
Step 4. Stay focussed on positivity.
It is so easy to become distracted by their and others nonsense and drama. Just remember allot of it is intentional. Actions of the enemy. Make realistic plans and goals. Even if they fail, take the positives out of it and move on to the next. Make them simple at first. For instance bring one new person to a get together. Then two and so forth. The spiral of negativity and depression can lead you down a deep hole that is hard to get out of.
Step 5. Trust no one. But, a BIG but, give people a chance. Make people earn your trust and if you are an honest, reliable trustworthy person you will earn theirs. But once again, always be on guard. If you have a true brother/friend you know it. Don't fuck it up. The gook Sun Tzu said the best way to defend against your enemy is to make your position unsalable. So in simplistic terms and to make it easy don't give your enemy or potential enemy anything to use against you. Clean up your backyard, don't do or say anything stupid and don't give them ammo to use against you at a later date. Then you don't have to be paranoid and walk on eggshells, you stomp then in the ground as you walk head held high.
Step 6. Where there's smoke there's fire.
If you hear something from multiple people there may be some truth to it. As #1 of Creativity's "what a creator is not". A Creator is not gullible and does not easily accept any statement belief or assertion or assumption that to him is lacking in proof and/or is unreasonable in the light of his own experience. However do your homework and find out for yourself.
Step 7. Be prepared.
I always tell people an old statement I was told by an old man. Expect the best but be prepared for the worst. From every "method" they can throw at you expect it not to happen but be prepared when it does. Men threaten violence, take it as its source but never let your guard down.
Finally Step 8. Be yourself.
Have fun, realize how important this task is, how much is at stake, the dangers we and our people face. But don't get burnt out. Many of racialists, give up, get frustrated and simply not only quit the movement but life in general. Apathy is the more appropriate name for this generation. The swarms of news articles and negativity that we see everyday, bellow a pessimistic tone. It desensitizes us and our actions. It is important to take time for yourself, appreciate yourself, love yourself, for what you have and what you can have. We have a long road ahead and the real fight hasn't even begun. Lets not be to worn out to fight.
Now my brothers and sisters you do these basic things and you will find that the future will be much brighter and happier. It wont be easy but it will be worth it in the long run. These internal enemies that serve our true racial enemies will eventually turn on each other like the jackals and Beta males they are.
I have faith in you.
And together we can win this Racial Holy War!
Rev James Logsdon
TCM and Black and Silver.
Jan 43AC (2016)
Friday 8 January 2016
Rev Logsdon Hosts Black and Silver Solution Radio #2...Jan 2016
Listen to Rev Logsdon Host Black and Silver Solution Radio January 7th 2016. On this show Rev Logsdon shares his thoughts on COINTELPRO/ Provocateurs / Net Warriors...(Note skip the first 1/2 hr of the show to avoid pointless interaction with agitators) Obama's Gun control laws / Rev Hale / TCM Books covers / Hal Turner / The Prison System / European " Refugee" invasion and more!
Rev Logsdon Hosts Black and Silver Solution Radio... Jan 7th 2016
Black and Silver Solution Radio
THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT
Rev Logsdon Hosts Black and Silver Solution Radio... Jan 7th 2016
Black and Silver Solution Radio
THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT
Tuesday 5 January 2016
Matt Hale (Appeal case).. Letter to Panel of Three Judges
Dec 21 2015
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
RE-CASE # 14-1294 Hale vs Oliver,
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please file the enclosed letter that I have written to the three Judges assigned to decide my case and furnish them copies accordingly.
Thank you kindly,
Very Truly Yours,
Matthew Hale
Appellant Pro Se
*********************************************************************************
Dec 18 2015
PANEL OF THREE JUDGES
ASSIGNED TO MY CASE
TENTH CIRCUIT OF APPEALS
CASE # 14-1294 Hale vs Oliver,
Your Honors :
I recently had the opportunity to listen to the recording of the Oral Argument that was held in my case this past November 19th and I thank you for the attention and consideration that you expressed for my predicament during that proceeding.
While I am otherwise pleased with what Mr. Sanders argued on my behalf, I believe that he omitted a very important point that could possibly prove critical in helping to determine whether I spend another 22 years in prison for crimes that I simply did not commit. Hence why I felt compelled to write you this letter. I beg your indulgence accordingly.
The simply fact of the matter is that innocence is a part of my case contrary to what Mr. Sanders implied at the Oral Argument, and it is that innocence that provides this court with the ( additional) ability to issue a rather narrow decision in my favor and thus assuage the concern that it expressed at Oral Argument that such a decision could lead to a flood gate of section 2241 of litigation.
Thus, I do not believe that it is so that my juror misconduct claim should be considered alone in that regard. Rather, my other claim of factual and legal innocence should also be considered as a means of providing a very narrow ruling to the court that I am indeed allowed to pursue my juror misconduct and innocent claims pursuant to section 2241.
While it is true that innocence is irrelevant to the Prost test
(Abernathy vs Wandes, 713. F 3D 538, 546 N 7 ), it is certainly highly relevant in regards to the constitutional avoidance arguments that I have presented as well as to my other arguments. Innocence also seems to be extremely important to the Governments own position in this case as well as to the decisions of the other circuits. Finally, it also seemed important to your Honors at the Oral Argument. Hence why I felt obliged to remind the court that it is part of my case and intrinsically so.
What makes my case so extremely unique is that very few prisoners are ever going to be able to claim, in good faith, that not only was the fundamental integrity of their trial undermined due to specific and provable juror misconduct but also that they are innocent of the charged offences altogether. Thus the combination of my juror misconduct claim and my innocence claim provides the court with the very limiting principle in a ruling in my favor that it sought to discern at Oral Argument.
No floodgates of section 2241 litigation will open as a result in a decision in my favor since hardly any prisoners are able to assert both that they are innocent and suffered juror misconduct. (I would remind the court that there are indeed two claims that I brought in this appeal, innocence, and juror misconduct and that the former is argued extensively in my opening brief, pages 11 - 52. I further more argued that the two claims should be considered in tandem with one another on pages 66 - 67 of that brief) Thus it was very important that I make this point clear before the court renders its decision.
I thank you for your attention and consideration in what has been a harrowing ordeal for me and my family to say the least.
Very Truly Yours,
Matthew Hale Pro Se
Appellant
Matthew Hale
15177-424
USP. MAX
P.O Box 8500
Florence Co. 81226
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
RE-CASE # 14-1294 Hale vs Oliver,
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please file the enclosed letter that I have written to the three Judges assigned to decide my case and furnish them copies accordingly.
Thank you kindly,
Very Truly Yours,
Matthew Hale
Appellant Pro Se
*********************************************************************************
Dec 18 2015
PANEL OF THREE JUDGES
ASSIGNED TO MY CASE
TENTH CIRCUIT OF APPEALS
CASE # 14-1294 Hale vs Oliver,
Your Honors :
I recently had the opportunity to listen to the recording of the Oral Argument that was held in my case this past November 19th and I thank you for the attention and consideration that you expressed for my predicament during that proceeding.
While I am otherwise pleased with what Mr. Sanders argued on my behalf, I believe that he omitted a very important point that could possibly prove critical in helping to determine whether I spend another 22 years in prison for crimes that I simply did not commit. Hence why I felt compelled to write you this letter. I beg your indulgence accordingly.
The simply fact of the matter is that innocence is a part of my case contrary to what Mr. Sanders implied at the Oral Argument, and it is that innocence that provides this court with the ( additional) ability to issue a rather narrow decision in my favor and thus assuage the concern that it expressed at Oral Argument that such a decision could lead to a flood gate of section 2241 of litigation.
Thus, I do not believe that it is so that my juror misconduct claim should be considered alone in that regard. Rather, my other claim of factual and legal innocence should also be considered as a means of providing a very narrow ruling to the court that I am indeed allowed to pursue my juror misconduct and innocent claims pursuant to section 2241.
While it is true that innocence is irrelevant to the Prost test
(Abernathy vs Wandes, 713. F 3D 538, 546 N 7 ), it is certainly highly relevant in regards to the constitutional avoidance arguments that I have presented as well as to my other arguments. Innocence also seems to be extremely important to the Governments own position in this case as well as to the decisions of the other circuits. Finally, it also seemed important to your Honors at the Oral Argument. Hence why I felt obliged to remind the court that it is part of my case and intrinsically so.
What makes my case so extremely unique is that very few prisoners are ever going to be able to claim, in good faith, that not only was the fundamental integrity of their trial undermined due to specific and provable juror misconduct but also that they are innocent of the charged offences altogether. Thus the combination of my juror misconduct claim and my innocence claim provides the court with the very limiting principle in a ruling in my favor that it sought to discern at Oral Argument.
No floodgates of section 2241 litigation will open as a result in a decision in my favor since hardly any prisoners are able to assert both that they are innocent and suffered juror misconduct. (I would remind the court that there are indeed two claims that I brought in this appeal, innocence, and juror misconduct and that the former is argued extensively in my opening brief, pages 11 - 52. I further more argued that the two claims should be considered in tandem with one another on pages 66 - 67 of that brief) Thus it was very important that I make this point clear before the court renders its decision.
I thank you for your attention and consideration in what has been a harrowing ordeal for me and my family to say the least.
Very Truly Yours,
Matthew Hale Pro Se
Appellant
Matthew Hale
15177-424
USP. MAX
P.O Box 8500
Florence Co. 81226
Friday 1 January 2016
HAPPY NEW YEAR! 43AC (2016)
Time stops for no one. In the blink of an eye, 42 years have passed since the inception of The Creativity Movement. This past year TCM has distributed a record number of Holy Books, welcomed enthusiastic new members into the Church and has formed alliances with other organizations that promote the Survival, Expansion and Advancement of the White Race.
Entering into the 43rd year of existence TCM continues to try and awaken the sleeping White masses and straighten out the White Mans thinking. The dedication and persistence I see from my Brothers and Sisters is inspirational, keep up the great work!
RAHOWA!
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
To all Creators and White Racial Loyalists around the world.
Good Health and happiness to you and your families, may 2016 bring about a Whiter and Brighter World.
For Natures Finest
Brother Smith
Entering into the 43rd year of existence TCM continues to try and awaken the sleeping White masses and straighten out the White Mans thinking. The dedication and persistence I see from my Brothers and Sisters is inspirational, keep up the great work!
RAHOWA!
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
To all Creators and White Racial Loyalists around the world.
Good Health and happiness to you and your families, may 2016 bring about a Whiter and Brighter World.
For Natures Finest
Brother Smith
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)