Monday, 15 October 2018

EMPIRE FALLS....Day of the Rope (Video)

                                Banned on You Tube # 8
                         EMPIRE FALLS....Day of the Rope












 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Friday, 5 October 2018

Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case) ...Memorandum Order


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 14-CV-0245-MSK-MJW

REVEREND MATT HALE,

Plaintiff,
v.


FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant.

           
                                                MEMORANDUM ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Deny Costs (# 222), the Defendant’s response (# 231), and the Plaintiff’s reply (# 232); the Plaintiff’s motion for Relief From Judgment (# 229), the Defendant’s response (# 233), and the Plaintiff’s Reply (# 240); the Defendant’s Motion to Restrict Access (# 236), the Plaintiff’s response (# 238), and the Plaintiff’s reply (# 244); and the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (# 238). For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiff’s motions are denied and the Defendant’s motion is granted.

The Court assumes the reader’s familiarity with the underlying facts in this litigation, thus the factual description is brief. Mr. Hale is an inmate at the Administrative Maximum facility in Florence, Colorado (ADX). Mr. Hale is/was the leader of “Creativity”, which he describes as a religious group.

In this action, Mr. Hale asserted a number of claims,1 four of which the Court determined by grant of summary judgment to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (## 212, 213).  Mr.  Hale originally brought 11 claims, seven of which were dismissed. (# 66).  

Those claims were: (1) that the BOP violated Mr. Hale’s right to practice his religion by imposing mail bans from July 2010 to January 2011 and January 2013 to August 2013 and by refusing to provide him a special diet; (2) that the mail bans and refusal to provide a special diet violated Mr. Hale’s religious-freedom rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; (3) that the BOP imposed the mail ban in retaliation for Mr. Hale’s exercise of his First Amendment rights; (4) that the BOP violated Mr. Hale’s First Amendment right to free speech when it prohibited him from having a copy of a book. Following entry of judgment, costs were taxed against Mr. Hale (# 226).



A. Motion for Relief From Judgment
The Court construes this Motion as a motion for reconsideration governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. Rule 60(b) permits the Court to reconsider an order due to, among other things, a substantive mistake or law or fact by the Court, newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered earlier, or as a result of any other reason that justifies relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)–(2), (6); Yapp v. Excel Corp., 186 F.3d 1222, 1231 (10th Cir. 1999). Reconsideration under Rule 60(b) is extraordinary, and may only be granted in exceptional circumstances. Rogers v. Andrus Transp. Servs., 502 F.3d 1147, 1153 (10th Cir. 2007). Reconsideration is not a tool to rehash previously-presented arguments already considered and rejected by the Court, nor is it properly used to present new arguments based upon law or facts that existed at the time of the original argument. FDIC v. United Pac.Ins. Co., 152 F.3d 1266, 1272 (10th Cir. 1998); Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243–44 (10th Cir. 1991).


Mr. Hale seeks reconsideration under Rule 60(b)(3), alleging fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the BOP. Specifically, Mr. Hale contends that his Creativity texts were  confiscated by prison personnel after entry of judgment in this case. From this, he contends that the BOP lied to the Court when it represented that Mr. Hale is permitted to keep such texts in his cell. The BOP responds that the texts were temporarily seized and searched in response to a security threat, and that once the search was complete, eight books (in accordance with ADX regulations) were returned to Mr. Hale. Of the eight books, Mr. Hale chose to keep only one Creativity text.


It is not clear that any misrepresentation has been made by the BOP. It represented in this action that Mr. Hale would be allowed to have Creativity texts in his cell. Indeed, he has been allowed to do so — he can have eight such books pursuant to ADX regulations, but he has chosen only to have one. Moreover, the appropriateness of the ADX regulation limiting Mr Hale to eight books at any given time was not the subject of this lawsuit. It concerned whether Mr.  Hale can have Creativity texts, not how many of them he may physically have in his cell at a given time. Indeed, at the time of entering judgment, the Court noted that the BOP would be within its discretion to confiscate such books from Mr. Hale in appropriate circumstances. Thus, the actions of the BOP do not constitute new evidence relevant to the determination in this matter. The motion is denied.

 
B. Motion to Deny Costs
The Defendants filed a Bill of Costs (# 218) seeking $5,226.35 in taxable expenses, and the Clerk of Court taxed costs (# 226) of the same amount in the Defendant’s favor. Mr. Hale seeks denial of the award of costs for four reasons: (1) the BOP repeatedly asserted privilege to obstruct Mr. Hale’s discovery requests; (2) the BOP acted in bad faith when its employees lied to the Court about Mr. Hale’s address at ADX when it “accidentally” left out a sentence from his press release; (3) the question he raised — whether Creativity is a religion — was a close and  difficult question; and (4) he is indigent, so imposing costs upon him would create a chilling effect on civil-rights litigants (# 222). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 provides that costs are awarded to a prevailing party as a matter of course unless the Court directs otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1).

 Denying costs is a severe penalty, so there must be a legitimate reason penalize the prevailing party. Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 668 F.3d 1174, 1182 (10th Cir. 2011). The Tenth Circuit has set forth six instances when it is proper to deny costs to a prevailing party: “(1) the prevailing party is only partially successful, (2) the prevailing party was obstructive and acted in bad faith during the course of the litigation, (3) damages are only nominal, (4) the nonprevailing party is indigent, (5) costs are unreasonably high or unnecessary, or (6) the issues are close and difficult.”
Debord v. Mercy Health Sys. of Kan. Inc., 737 F.3d 642, 659–60 (10th Cir. 2013). Only the second, fourth, and sixth instances arguably apply here.

Mr. Hale’s argument about the BOP’s assertion of privilege falls within none of the exceptions to an award of costs. The invocation of privilege is a proper, routine, and important part of the litigation process. Mr. Hale does not show that the BOP’s assertion of privilege was not authorized or was manifestly improper so as to constitute bad faith.

Mr.Hale’s assertion that the BOP lied to the Court is based upon two assertions: (1) that the BOP misrepresented the Mr. Hale’s address to the Court; and (2) that the BOP misrepresented the contents of a press release made by Mr. Hale when he was housed in another facility. As to the first alleged misrepresentation, the Court finds upon review of Mr. Hale’s prior submissions, that no misrepresentation was made to the Court about his address — any misstatement by the BOP was to third parties, and such misstatement had no bearing on the merits of this case. The second instance also is of limited import. Mr. Hale argues that the BOP quoted only a portion of his press release made when he was at FCI Terra Haute. The press release criticized the appointment of the attorney who had been prosecutor in Mr. Hale’s his case to a federal judicial position. In the press release, Mr. Hale stated:   
Hale Persecutor (Prosecutor) Appointed Federal Magistrate Judge!


I’m sure he’ll do great there for the federal, Jewish tyranny that presently rules over us and help consign some more innocent people to a prison cell for decades like he did me. [He] is living proof of why people would have the silly idea that the Nazis would try to kill six million Jews, for in my particular case he prosecuted a man he knew to be innocent all along only so that a critic of the

Jewish domination of our country could be silenced. He caused enormous grief to me, my family, and my church. Well, in any case, it is my hope that [he] will one day receive his comeuppance. # 186 at 95.

Mr. Hale complains that the BOP failed to include language that explained his meaning of the word “comeuppance”. Again, it is difficult to see a misrepresentation here. The BOP stated to the Court that Mr. Hale meant “legal comeuppance” and it is with that understanding that the Court issued its opinion. # 212 at 26. Mr. Hale fails to explain how such clarification was inadequate. Thus, even if the original quotation was inaccurate, it had no effect on the determination in this matter.



The Court appreciates that its long opinion may create the impression that this matter raised “close and difficult” issues. But that the constitutional issues raised by Mr. Hale were important and deserving of thorough consideration did not mean that they were “close and difficult”. With regard to whether Creativity is a “religious” belief system, the Court noted that multiple district courts had addressed the issue between 2002 and 2011 and none had found it to be so. Applying Tenth Circuit precedent in United States v. Meyers, 95 F.3d 1475 (10th Cir.1996), the Court reached the same conclusion finding that four out of the five factors mentioned weighed against Creativity being considered a religion. The Court’s analysis on the mail restrictions was equally as clear. Even if the Court had determined that Creativity was a valid religion it found that the restrictions on Mr. Hale’s correspondence were justified by a compelling interest and were narrowly tailored to meet that interest.


Turning to Mr. Hale’s indigence, he is correct that indigence must be considered and there is no dispute that he is indigent. But, in the Tenth Circuit, indigence alone is not dispositive. Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms Inc., 360 F.3d 1180, 1190 (10th Cir. 2004). The Court is mindful that the Rules presume that costs will be awarded in most cases, and indeed, Congress has specifically provided that litigants proceeding in forma pauperis shall be liable for costs in the same manner “as in other proceedings.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(f)(1); Sandle v. Principi, 201 F. App’x 579, 583 (10th Cir. 2006).


Ultimately, the question of whether it is fair to assess costs against an indigent party,2 and in this regard, the Court makes several observations. First, as noted above, Rule 54(d) and various other legislative enactments represent a general societal preference that the costs of unsuccessful litigation should be borne by the losing party, even if that party may be indigent. If Congress intended to abrogate and modify a prevailing party's presumptive entitlement to costs when the losing party was indigent, it could have done so in the in forma pauperis statute. The fact that Congress directed that indigent litigants will generally be liable for costs “as in other proceedings” strongly suggests that Congress does not consider indigence, alone, to be particularly strong cause for refusing to award costs.

Second, the Court notes that Mr. Hale initiated this suit with full appreciation of the 2 Mr. Hale makes much of the difference in size between him, the indigent party, and the BOP, arguing that it is unfair to award costs to the BOP given its vast resources. The Court cannot find any authority to suggest that the relative resources between the parties are relevant in considering the nonprevailing party’s indigence. possibility of incurring costs. He is a law school graduate and has litigated many matters.
Indeed, he has filed multiple suits in federal court not including any post-conviction review.3 Though none of these suits has proceeded far enough to result in an award of costs, the possibility of incurring costs has not deterred Mr. Hale from asserting his rights. Accordingly, while the Court acknowledges Mr. Hale’s indigence as a circumstance weighing against awarding costs to the BOP, the Court finds that on balance, he has failed to overcome the general presumption that costs should be awarded to the prevailing party.


C. Remaining Motions

The BOP seeks Level 1 restriction on the unredacted declaration of Lieutenant Amy Kelley (# 234) because it quotes Mr. Hale’s writings, which it says could potentially spur his followers to violence. A minimally redacted copy of the declaration exists on the docket without restriction (# 233-1). The public interest is adequately served by this small redaction.


Mr. Hale asks the Court to strike the BOP’s response (# 233) to his Motion for Relief From Judgment because he never received it. As his reply brief thereto indicates (# 240), he did eventually receive the response. Accordingly, this motion is denied as moot.



3 See Hale v. Ashcroft, No. 06-CV-0541 (D. Colo.); Hale v. Lefkow, 239 F. Supp. 2d 842 (C.D. Ill. 2003) (02-1420); Hale v. Cmte. on Character & Fitness for the State of Ill., No. 01-CV-5065, 2002 WL 398524 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 13, 2002), aff’d 335 F.3d 678 (7th Cir. 2003); Hale v. Schaumburg Twp. Dist. Lib., No. 01-CV-2220 (N.D. Ill.).


 D. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff’s Motion to Deny Costs (# 222) and Motion for Relief From Judgment (# 229) are DENIED. The Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (# 238) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Defendant’s Motion to Restrict Access (# 236) is GRANTED. Docket # 234 shall remain at Level 1 Restriction.

Dated this 2nd day of October, 2018.




BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger Chief United States District Judge


 

Tuesday, 2 October 2018

RAHOWA....Race Riot (Video)

                                 Banned on YouTube #7
                                   RAHOWA...Race Riot














                              RAHOWA...Race Riot (Lyrics)

Bloody riots on the streets, the niggers run amok
Tremble in fear, white man, the reaper's in the shadowland
Save your children, lock your doors
You can't come out here no more
On this eve, blood shall be shed
The streets and rivers run deep red

Ref: Don't you know we're fighting a race riot, race riot!
Don't you know we're fighting a race riot, race riot!
Don't you, don't you know? x 2
White man!

Violence, anger released full-force
Racial tensions explode their course
You could've made all so well
Now your land's a living hell
Angry war of hate and pain
While our hope goes down the drain
Simple answer long ago
Now you're faced with a nigger foe

Scream in vain as all comes down
All your sons cannot be found
Watch your wife and daughter raped
But you can't stop those wild apes
You know you should have realized
When you looked into their eyes
What they had in store for you
Now there's nothing you can do





Monday, 1 October 2018

We Don't Need Any Mugwumps in Our Camp...By Ben Klassen

White Man, make up your mind!
The mugwump is a dirty bird which sits on the fence with its mug on one side and its wump on the other. It can never make up its mind which side of the fence it is on. In fact, it can never make up its mind, period. It prefers to straddle the fence forever and a day.

There are a lot of good people in the racial movement who act as pusillanimous as does the mugwump. They are the kind that can’t quite make up their mind what racial organization they should join and support, and as a compromise they contribute a drib here and a drab there. I know of some people who proudly point to the fact that they "belong" to a dozen different "racialist" organizations.

We Creators abhor such a polyglot, blunderbuss, scattered and fragmented approach in trying to build a powerful force with which to smash a unified, fanatic, well-entrenched Jewish conspiracy. No mugwump or collection of mugwumps has ever achieved anything, no matter how numerous they might be. Only a unified, well organized and highly dedicated army of militants can effectively counter and destroy the powerful and sinister Jewish Tyranny that now holds the world in its thrall. Although there are other lesser examples, we point with pride to the formation of Hitler’s Nazi party during the 1920’s and 1930’s.

After World War I, approximately 2000 Nationalist parties sprang up in war-devastated Germany during the next decade. As a conglomerate they were totally ineffective in ousting the decadent, Jew-controlled postwar government and in stemming the Jewish-Communist tide. It was not until the members of these bickering and polyglot organizations dropped their petty parties and joined with Adolf Hitler that the German people finally had the clout to take over their government and take back their own country.

We believe that the same principle applies to the dilemma in America today, if we are ever to wipe Judaism off the face of the earth. What is different today is that it must now become a global battle in which the total White Race, informed, aroused and organized, takes on the perfidious foe and exterminates it once and for all. In order to do so we must mobilize all our resources. We must utilize every weapon the White Race can possibly assemble – religious, economic, political, moral, educational and every other means available to us and then concentrate our fire. We are further convinced that only the C.O.T.C. with its comprehensive, all embracing creed of the global White Racial Religion – Creativity – is geared to do that awesome job. In the one and only, true and revolutionary White Racial Religion – Creativity, we have the total program, the final solution, the ultimate creed for the salvation and redemption of the White Race.



We urge every good White Man and Woman to stop being mugwumps, to make up their minds as to which organization they believe is best fitted to do the job that urgently needs to be done, and then concentrate on that one organization and give it your all. We don’t want mugwumps. We want angry, militant tigers.


RAHOWA!

Ben Klassen
Founder... Church of the Creator



















                                ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY # 60
                                                              JUNE 17AC (1990)





Wednesday, 26 September 2018

Faith Goldy/ Dr.James Sears/ Chris Brosky/ (Paul Fromm)....For Mayor of Toronto (Hamilton) Oct/2018

                                       FAITH GOLDY

While not considered a Racial loyalist by the far right, she is labelled a racist by the left.  If any of the fringe candidates has a chance to have a decent showing against incumbent John Tory it is her. She has caught the public's attention, especially after having her picture taken with Premier Ford at Ford Fest last weekend. The left of course has demanded that Ford denounce Goldy. What if Ford Nation got behind her? Could be interesting. 

 
 
        To read about Faith Goldy's Policies visit her web site...….
                                FAITH FOR TORONTO    


                                     DR. JAMES SEARS

He will be my choice for Mayor of Toronto on Oct 22nd. Dr. Sears is the Editor-In-Chief of  Your Ward News (Anti-Marxist publication)  YOUR WARD NEWS   and has been investigated for "Hate crimes" more times than anyone in Toronto.  Dr. Sears would end Toronto's designation as a Sanctuary city and deport illegal "refugees" immediately. 
 
 
 
 
To read more about Dr.James Sears  platform
 


 
 
CHRIS BROSKY
 

An article by Don Andrews...….



 
 
 
Well we have  our candidate for Mayor of Toronto that the Nationalist Party of Canada is going to support, and it's Chris Brosky.
 
No one is perfect, and certainly non hard-pressed white nationalist candidates; pro-white nationalist Chris Brosky got involved in a murder at the age of sixteen in Texas, got sixteen years for the crime after 10,000 blacks complained about him getting a lighter sentence as a delinquent white Canadian (Chris holds no grudges).

Chris, now 44, survived it all and is back in his Canada with no criminal record and has taken up community service in his poor neighborhood of all races and faiths in downtown Toronto .

Chris Brosky knows the city and I've traveled with him, pointing out all the dragging privatization construction jobs, unsynchronized traffic lights and hardly-ever-used street-disrupting Mayor John Tory-imposed bike lanes (like on Woodbine Avenue) that congest traffic everywhere. Chris is very concerned about the homeless and I've pointed out to him the appearance of vast numbers of panhandlers and overcrowded, bedbug-ridden overnight shelters that plague our beautiful brick-and-tree-canopied city of Toronto.

The allocation of tax dollars to foreign refugees and housing angers a lot of poor Canadians of all colors, while Canadian single mother families have to go to emergency shelters because of the lack of affordable housing.

The mayor of a city can do a lot by gentle encouragement and public vitriol to help ease the housing crisis in our beautiful city. He can start by encouraging little old cat ladies living alone over-housed in two and three story homes, to rent a room or two and we can all benefit, instead of poor whites fleeing to small towns from violent multicultural cities to create affordability like in the United States.

Chris Brosky is a "wise guy"; he once had a statuette of Buddah in a necklace; he likes to think he thinks and he's had lots of time for that -- he's well-read, too, and knows his history, so he can plan for the future to maintain a white civilization in Toronto. But most of all, Chris Brosky is a man of his word and handshake. Chris knows my peasant Slav (Bosnia) background (my birth name was Vilim Zlomislic). "Two chickens," as he puts it, with a DP accent... my words mean what I say", so I'm taking Chris at his word because there are two other candidates who can be construed as white nationalists running for Mayor of Toronto as our white renaissance (Trump. Ford, etc.). One of them is James Sears, testing the limits of free speech with his Your Ward News and its new world order conspiracy stuff, and Faith Goldy with the kosher conservative Sun Media -- until she attended the white nationalist Charlottesville, Virginia rally recently.

I don't know these people, but I do know there's a desire by many whites to unite, if not in violent Charlottesville, then at least in the safety of a secret ballot "X" mark (not even your name will be known. Our enemies will be watching the progress of the three white nationalist racist Toronto mayoralty candidates. All their votes can be lumped together to see the core and strength of white racists in the city and of those who came here from the Third World to enjoy the benefits of a white culture-- their votes are in there too.

 These three candidates may not win, but they represent the wave of the future to keep this city safe and secure. This is your chance to preserve the past and ensure the future by spreading the word that Brosky is Best ... all else will follow. Good luck Chris, on October 22nd. You have my vote.

Don Andrews
Leader Nationalist Party of Canada



                                       PAUL FROMM

Last, but not least, Paul Fromm is running for Mayor of Hamilton, Ontario. Mr. Fromm is a well known free speech advocate and true Canadian patriot. If he becomes Mayor of Hamilton, I will be moving there. Make Hamilton great again! Vote Fromm  


     

 A vote for any of the above, no matter how futile it seems, will send a message. Be heard on, Oct 22nd 

Brother Smith 


Wednesday, 19 September 2018

Rev Matt Hale (Civil Case).... Reply Brief of Reverend Matt Hale

To read this document in it's entirety see the FREE MATT HALE Site...…….. Reply brief of Reverend Matt Hale

Some quotes from Rev Hale contained in this document...…………

" Remarkably the Defendant's have filed a 19,431 word purported
"answer" brief which answers practically nothing of what Hale had to say. " 

" They truly believe, in their heart of hearts that a disposition of this entire case can and should rest instead upon Hale being a supposed "White supremist" who follows a religion they don't happen to like." 

" The bottom line is this ; The Defendant's don't like Creativity and they don't like Hale for believing in it. " 

" In former times the Defendants would have simply burned Hale at the stake, like their good, kind, and loving, Christian forebears used to do to all who would not conform to their own view of things." 

" The record evidence , indeed overwhelming record evidence, is that the Creativity religion, not only opposes, but forbids any and all illegal and violent acts by its adherents in it's mission and fight to attain the salvation of the White race. " 

" The Defendant's various attacks upon Creativity for being "violent" are just not good enough to avoid a trial here. "

" While Creators have no doubt committed crimes before, so have, Christians, Muslims and Jews. There is no record evidence, however, that Creators have ever done so as a "group". " 

" The idea that the Creativity religion "routinely engages in violence" is ridiculous and unsupported by any record evidence. Religions don't "do" anything, individuals do. "

" The chapter in question in fact destroys their entire argument, as well their entire case that Creativity is not a religion. Creativity is a religion of nature, just as other religions are religions of god. " 

" Creators are not racist for the fun of it, Creators are racist because all creatures in the nature world are racist and it is to nature that Creators pay homage. Other religions obey "god" Creators obey nature. " 

" The very fact that Creativity is disdainful of other religions, shows that it is in fact, a religion. "  

SUBMITED SEPTEMBER 13TH 2018








  





             

Thursday, 13 September 2018

SOUTHERN ONTARIO SKINHEADS...Music FINAL WAR...Aryan Pride (Video)

                                  Banned on YouTube #6
                     SOUTHERN ONTARIO SKINHEADS
                       Music.. FINAL WAR... Aryan Pride













                                                              FINAL WAR






 FINAL WAR ….Aryan Pride (Lyrics)

Brothers and sisters, join together as one.
Fists uplifted, faces towards the sun.
Pride in our expression, from fear we will not hide
Hail one, hail all, hail Aryan Pride!

Many people hate us for only being proud
Well I'd like to ask them, who's the racist now?
We're not mindless morons like you see on your TV
Newsflash for ratings, it's a fact of history.

Minorites cry white man, yeah white man full of hate
White man gets the blame 'cause of the colour of his face
Its strangest how the white man is often classed by race.
Its funny how society can't see that that's the case.

Many people hate us for only being proud
Well I'd like to ask them, who's the racist now?
We're not mindless morons like you see on your TV
Newsflash for ratings, it's a fact of history.

Our honour won't be broken, we'll hold our heads up high
We will keep on fighting so the white race doesn't die
Our message will be spread. our voices loud and clear
Inform the youth of the truth, the Jews greatest fear.

Many people hate us for only being proud
Well I'd like to ask them, who's the racist now?
We're not mindless morons like you see on your TV
Newsflash for ratings, it's a fact of history.


Sunday, 9 September 2018

VINLAND WARRIORS....RAHOWA! (Video)

                                  Banned on YouTube #5
                      VINLAND WARRIORS ……. RAHOWA!












 
 
 
 

Wednesday, 5 September 2018

KILL BABY, KILL...Punks Not Red (Video)

                               Banned on YouTube #4
                      KILL BABY, KILL... Punks Not Red!











 
 
 
 
 
LYRICS...……
 KILL BABY KILL! ... Punks not Red
 
People seem to think that by definition Punk is red, just because of what some big fat cunt called Mensi said. I will state it clear for once as I think someone should, Punks not red and never was I hope I'm understood.
 
Punks not red, Punks not red - don't believe what Mensi said! Punks not red, Punks not red - get that in your fucking head! Punks not red, Punks not red - listen well and don't forget! Punks not red, Punks not red - Punks not red!
 
Punk was once an answer to oppression by the state, it's sticking up the finger against the system we all hate. I'm talking above the real Punks - working class and proud, not these stinking crusties who don't know what Punks about.
 
Punks not red, Punks not red - don't believe what Mensi said! Punks not red, Punks not red - get that in your fucking head! Punks not red, Punks not red - listen well and don't forget! Punks not red, Punks not red - Punks not red!
 
Punks not red, Punks not red - don't believe what Mensi said! Punks not red, Punks not red - get that in your fucking head! Punks not red, Punks not red - listen well and don't forget! Punks not red, Punks not red - Punks not red!
 
I don't like the communists and I will tell you why, they're living in a fantasy - they're living in a lie. If we talk about oppression - Communism rules, the penny doesn't seem to drop for all these crustie-fools. Punk is claimed by commies to promote their twisted truth, it's nothing but a poor attempt to poisoning our youth. All the eyes will open up one day 'cause we ain't dumb, Punks and Skins united we will rock the leftwing scum.
 
Punks not red, Punks not red - don't believe what Mensi said! Punks not red, Punks not red - get that in your fucking head! Punks not red, Punks not red - listen well and don't forget! Punks not red, Punks not red - Punks not red! Punks not red, Punks not red - don't believe what Mensi said! Punks not red, Punks not red - get that in your fucking head! Punks not red, Punks not red - listen well and don't forget! Punks not red, Punks not red - Punks not red! ...and it never was!
 
 
 
 

Sunday, 2 September 2018

We are Not White Supremacists, We are White Racial Loyalists-Creators...By Ben Klassen


We are not "White Supremacists," we are White Racial Loyalists-Creators

(This letter has been published in the Franklin Press)

In the Wednesday, Feb. 1, 1990, edition of The Franklin Press, there appeared the headline "White Supremacist Continues Tax Fight." Granting that the reporter, Elizabeth Gill could not possibly cover all the issues involved in this controversy in one article, on the whole, I would say that she did a commendable job in trying to be impartial on two subjects that are highly controversial, namely race and religion. However, there were a few major errors and omissions that need to be addressed.




In the first place, calling the Church of the Creator a White Supremacist organization is erroneous and misleading. The phrase "White Supremacist" has been used loosely and indiscriminately by the liberal and Jewish press as a buzz word to put down any and every White person who exhibits any pride or loyalty to his own race. Without ever defining the phrase, it immediately implies a bad image. It is a "slur" word, similar to the word "nigger" when applied to blacks.

What is a White Supremacist? We of the C.O.T.C. define it as a term used to describe White people who seek to rule over the non-white people, to dominate them, to exploit them and to abuse them. To their discredit, this the White Race has done in many phases of its checkered history. There are any number of cases we can cite, such as the British ruling and exploiting India over a period of two hundred years; the White plantation owners of the South exploiting black African slaves; the French plantation owners of San Domingo (present-day Haiti and the Dominican Republic) two hundred years ago exploiting imported black Africans in huge numbers and utilizing them as slaves; the Spaniards exploiting the Indians in Mexico and South America; the list is endless. In each case the exploiters thought they were getting a real bargain in cheap labor, but eventually the slaves out-bred and interbred with their White masters, and in the end the slaves mongrelized and destroyed the future progeny of their exploiters who had dragged them into their midst in the first place.

We of the Church of the Creator want none of this. We don’t want to rule over anyone, we don’t want to enslave or exploit anyone – black, yellow or purple. Nor do we want to intermarry with them, or intermix with them, or socialize with them. Nor do we want any part of the insane course our government has been pursuing for the past 45 years of subsidizing all the "mud races" of the "Third World," or the "emerging countries," or subsidizing the parasitic little state of Israel to the tune of three billion (or more) dollars a year, or subsidizing any other foreign country. Where in our Constitution does it say that we, the productive White people of America, owe all parasites of the world a living? We Creators say: let us stop this insanity that is causing a disastrous population explosion the likes of which the world has never seen, and is crowding the White Race from the face of Planet Earth. How stupid can we get – feeding and subsidizing all the scum of the world – who return our largesse with hatred and hostility.

 
It is not the goal of the Church of the Creator to "eliminate the mud races, including Jews, Indians and blacks," as the article in the "Press" contends. Our position is that like every other creature in Nature, let us take care of our own and let those that are alien to us fend for themselves. It is not our obligation, nor Is It in our Interest to feed a billion Hindus in India, or the millions of inhabitants of Sudan, or the Arab-killing Zionists of Israel, or billions of other mud races, most of which hate us White people with a passion in return for generosity. We say – they are NOT our kind, they are NOT our brothers, and they are NOT our concern



. Let them fend for themselves or wither on the vine. I repeat, they are not our obligation, nor are they our concern. In any case, the more we feed them, the more they breed until the world is becoming (has become!) an over-polluted cesspool of clawing, hostile and starving people, and we have created it by our idiotic program of subsidizing 126 countries that are alien to us.


We Creators want none of this. We want only to take care of our own and strive for the survival of our own precious race – the White Race, which we regard with pride as Nature’s Finest.
This is the basis of our religion. If you are Interested in learning more about Creativity, read our three basic books: Nature’s Eternal Religion, The White Man’s Bible, and Salubrious Living.

Ben Klassen
Founder Church of the Creator






















ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY # 58
APRIL 17AC(1990)


Friday, 31 August 2018

Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case).....ORDER (Declaration of Non-Service of Brief)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR TIIE TENTH CIRCUIT


REVEREND MATTHEW HALE,
Plaintiff- Appellant

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et a1.,
Defendants - Appellees.


                                                          ORDER

This matter is before the court on Appellant's "Declaration of Non-Service of
Appellees' Oversize brief," which the court construes as a motion for extension of time to file the reply brief. As construed, the motion is granted. The reply brief shall be filed and served on or before September 18,2018. No further extensions will be granted on the Clerk's authority.

Entered for the Court
ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

No. 18-1141

FILED … AUGUST 31ST 2018