Killing The Bill of Rights

Persons incarcerated in America's prisons are not without the protection of the Constitution. They do not forfeit all their rights when those iron bars close behind them. lf that were so, then all Americans would also be without constitutional rights because many is the innocent individual who finds him or herself behind those same bars. lndeed, the attempt to deny imprisoned persons at least their 1st and 14th Amendment rights has already been adjudicated in Procunier v. Martinez, [1974] 416 US 396, pages 415-418.

The case involved censorship regulations under which the penal institution proscribed the inmate's correspondence because he, ". .unduly complain[ed], magnif[ied] grievances, express[ed] inflammatory political, racial, religious or other views or beliefs" considered "defamatory" or "otherwise inappropriate." The District Court held these regulations unconstitutional and void under the 1st Amendment for their ambiguity. The Court also ruled the regulation in violation of the 14th Amendment's guarantee of procedural due process and enjoined its continued enforcement. The Court required that the inmate of the rejected correspondence be notified of his right to protest the decision and to have said correspondence reviewed by a knowledgeable prison official other than the original censor and that his or her decision be based upon the Court's rejection of the regulation involved.

lnmate Matthew Hale has lost what the Courts have ruled he has every right to maintain-his 1st and 14th Amendment rights, Matt's "mail reader," Rudy Marques is constantly harassing him, withholding his mail often for months at a time and returning letters to those who send them because they contain "gang related" material-a totally false claim. And now, the attorney for the penal institution, James Wiencek, has not only refused to validate chapters of Matt’s new book, but despite efforts to address the unconstitutional censorship enforced by Wiencek by rewriting those chapters, Matt has been informed by this petty tyrant that his edited chapter has been "trashed". lt is obvious that this man who may be responsible for Matt’s harassment, believes that he can nullify at least two Amendments of the Bill of Rights. lf this is permitted despite the District Court's ruling, the question then becomes, when will such tyrants be permitted to nullify the remaining eight Amendments of the Bill of Rights?

                                FREE MATT HALE!

 

 

 

 

MUDOVEN .... Aim and Fire (Video)

                           Banned on YouTube #47
                         MUDOVEN ….. Aim and Fire

 

 

 

 

 

CONDEMNED 84 .... Skinhead (Video)

Banned on YouTube #46

CONDEMNED 84 …. Skinhead

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Red Niggers in Texas ....By Ben Klassen

 

How the early Texans cleansed the muds out of their territory

Red Niggers in Texas

No state has a more colorful and glorious history than does the State of Texas, and no state more clearly exemplifies the eternal struggle of the White Man against his deadly racial enemies – the Indians, the Mexicans and JOG, the Federal government itself. Today that struggle goes on, more deadly than ever, in Texas, and on a national basis, and in fact, on a worldwide basis. The only situation that has changed is that the White Race now has more racial enemies pitted against it than ever, namely Asiatics, Haitians, South American and Central Americans, mud peoples, and a host of others. In the meantime, JOG has become more powerful, more vicious and hostile, and the boundaries of the racial war have become more confused and obscure in the White Man’s vision.

Nevertheless, the war today is very real and more ferocious than eve. Whereas the early Texans took direct and effective action and won their racial war more than a hundred years ago, today the opposite is unraveling before our eyes. The White Race is losing, is leaderless, confused, and rapidly on its way to extinction. Let us review some stages of the interesting and heroic history of the White Man’s conquest of the great Lone Star State, how he was beset with the same evil forces we are today, and how he took direct and drastic action to triumph over his mortal enemies.

 

 

I have read a number of books on the Texas Rangers, on the battle of the Alamo, the heroic battle at San Jacinto, and Texas history in general. Most of them downplay and/or de-emphasize the historic fact that the Conquest of Texas was essentially a racial war – a long drawn out three-cornered struggle between the White Man, the Mexicans and the Indians. It was not until recently, however, that when Rev. John Brooks sent me another book on Texas that I realized how fierce and intense that racial battle was. The name of the book is The Lone Star – A History of Texas, and what especially piqued my interest was a chapter in the middle of the book entitled Red Niggers, a term of contempt used by the early White settlers for the ever marauding Indians.

 

For two hundred years the area known as Texas had been claimed by the Spanish conquerors of Mexico. However, by the time the first White settlers arrived in this area under the auspices of Empressario Stephen F. Austin during the 1820’s, the Spanish and Mexican colonization of Texas had been a colossal failure. As in South America, and in Mexico Itself, the Spanish conquest, although preceding by almost two centuries that of their rivals, differed significantly from that of the Anglo-Saxon colonization. The Spaniards did not conquer to colonize. There were three major forces in play that determined the course of Empire. They were the Crown, the army, and the Catholic Church, not all three necessarily on the same course. They came to exploit the land and the native labor, mine the gold and silver and enrich the coffers of the Crown, and in the process expand the domination of the Catholic Church. But as colonizers they were a total failure. They did indeed strip the land of its gold and silver, shipping its wealth across the ocean to make Spain the most affluent domain in Europe during the sixteenth and seventeenth century.

Over the centuries of unabated effort, the attempt by the Catholic Church to Christianize the Indian heathen was a total failure. They did build a number of missions with Indian slave labor, but the Indians did not embrace this alien creed as their own. In fact, only the more docile tribes could be domesticated at all, and during the process they invariably declined in numbers and eventually died out. The more warlike tribes, such as the Comanches, the Apaches and others, rejected Catholicism in toto, and kept up their raiding, scalping and thieving.

As we come to the first half of the nineteenth century, there were a string of five Spanish missions in Texas, of which San Antonio de Bexar was the most prominent, but all were in a state of decline and decay. By the 1820’s the Mexican revolution had aborted from Spain, the country was in chaos and the now mix-breed Mexican settlers in Texas were only a few, subject to the terror and raiding parties of the warlike Indians to the north and to the west. Not only was Mexican colonization not advancing, it was retreating.

When Moses Austin, followed by his son Stephen F. Austin, approached the Mexican government with an offer of bringing in 300 Anglo-American families on a given tract of choice Texas lad, the Mexican government was receptive. This they were not because they liked the Anglos, but because they hoped that these more durable Americans would act as a buffer zone and thus protect the territory behind them for the Mexican settlers to expand upon.

Moses Austin soon died after the initial application, but his son carried on and the Anglo-Celts, Anglo-Saxons, and Anglo-Americans were indeed tough, and a more durable breed. When the new settlers were offered tracts of one site of legua (4428 acres) of good land at 12-1/2 cents an acre, the rush was on. The first wave came from the Trans-Appalachian South – Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee and Missouri. The main motive was economic improvement – an opportunity to own and settle on good land at approximately one-tenth the going price in the United States. First came the farmers and hardy frontiersmen, soon followed by merchants, lawyers and townsmen. By 1825 his original 300 patents were used up and Austin applied for more. In the next ten years Austin succeeded in locating more than 1500 families. But he was not the only Empressario. There were soon 25 more, although none as successful as Austin. In a single decade these White Americans had more children, raised more crops and built more towns than the Spaniards had in the previous three hundred years.

Although these American frontiersmen were subjects of the Mexican government and had to "profess’ to Catholicism in order to obtain the patents to their land, they brought with them their European culture and American ideas of freedom. As such they were soon on a collision course with the chaotic and ever-changing Mexican government, who by 1830 began to view the Anglos with hatred, envy and fear. Further Immigration of Americans from the north to Texas was restricted, and whereas the early settlers had enjoyed almost unlimited freedom from taxation and Mexican government bureaucracy, now they became subjected to both. Nevertheless, the White Anglo settlers from the American north and east kept on coming in ever increasing numbers. A rebellion and a racial war was inevitable and it was soon to come.

Not only were the White settlers faced with the hostility of the Mexican nation of whose territory they were a part, but the depredations and hit and run raids from the war-like tribes on horseback to the north and west kept increasing. Whereas the Austin colony had settled in an area that had only a scattering of unwarlike Indians, as the numbers of White settlers increased so did the repeated raids from the fierce Comanches, Lipans, Apaches, Karankawas and other Indian warriors on horseback. Stephen F. Austin early in the settlement had organized "companies of ranging volunteers" that were soon to become the notorious Texas Rangers, the scourge of the Indians and the Mexicans, the latter calling them the "Diablos Tejano," the Texan devils.
 

A three cornered racial war was facing the ever expanding White settlers, between the Indians, the Mexicans and the late arriving White settlers. It was a war that was to continue for more than sixty years. It Is not our intent here, nor do we have the space, to give even a concise resume of the colorful history of Texas in the nineteenth century. Suffice it to say that by 1835 the independent, freedom-loving White Texans had had enough and were ready to revolt against the Mexican tyranny. This culminated in the thunderclap at the Alamo when the then President and General of the armies, Santa Anna marched north and decided to teach these Americanos a lesson they would never forget. After 13 days of siege, on March 5, 1836, Santa Anna and his 5000 regulars stormed the walls of the improvised fortress and within a matter of a few hours it was all over. The 182 heroic defenders of the Alamo were all slaughtered and mutilated beyond recognition. But the Mexicans had won only a Pyrrhic victory at best, and the Americans exacted a heavy toll of at least 1600 dead Mexicans and more than 500 wounded, and it was here that the legend of the Diablos Tejanos was spawned.

The shock-waves of the Alamo spread terror throughout Texas and sent the American colonists fleeing eastward with their families, as Santa Anna, despite his heavy losses, was determined to wipe out every last Americano In Texas.

Soon thereafter Sam Houston was given charge of a rag-tag army of 800 volunteers by the then interim government of President David C. Burnett, who headed up a sorely divided cabinet. Houston, too, kept retreating eastward, gaining additional volunteers as he went. Some of his men began grumbling that he, Houston was afraid to fight, but Houston consulted no one and kept his counsel to himself. Then, at the appropriate moment on the afternoon of April 21, Houston attacked. While Santa Anna’s army was camped at the San Jacinto bayou only a mile from the Americans, and enjoying an afternoon siesta, Houston launched his attack on the surprised Mexicans.   
The shout Remember the Alamo! went up as the Americans ran screaming at the disorganized Mexicans. It was all over in about 18 minutes and the carnage that ensued was indescribable. By nightfall 630 Mexican corpses lay scattered in clumps across the grassy field, with more than 200 wounded, as the disoriented Mexican remnants surrendered. The Americans had lost only two killed in action, with about 30 wounded, of whom seven more would die later. General and Presidente Santa Anna had fled, but was captured the next day, disguised in a private’s uniform.

As the news of San Jacinto spread, great cheering went up all over Texas and the pioneers and their families returned to their farms. Houston had not only won a most decisive battle in the history of the White Race, but he had also Won the West. Texas had won its independence.

Nevertheless, the three-cornered racial battle between the Indians, the Mexicans and the White Texan settlers continued. The hit-and-run marauding raids by the fiercest Indians on horseback in North America – the Comanches, the Lipans, the Apaches, the Karankawas – not only continued but increased In Intensity. So also did the intensity of the hatred of the Mexicans, now that they had lost Texas. The United States government in Washington took a strictly hands-off policy and was of no help. They had made a treaty with Mexico in 1819 in which they conceded Texas was Mexican territory. Although the new Republic of Texas wanted to join the United States, the festering slave issue, the eastern bankers and politicians rejected their White brothers who had conquered Texas by sheer blood, guts and colonization.


The White colonists carried on. They formed an independent Republic. The hero of San Jacinto, Sam Houston was its first president, limited by the new constitution to a two-year term. The Indian raids increased. The new Republic was bankrupt and badly in need of not only money, but material goods of every kind. It could not afford a regular army. Having spent three years of his youth among the Cherokee Indians, Houston had a soft spot in his head about the Indian attacks. Houston was succeeded by Mirabeau Buonaparte Lamar, also a hero of San Jacinto, as president of the Republic in 1838.

Unlike Houston, Lamar had no soft spot or illusions about the racial war that freed the colonists. He faced the reality: Texas had to fend for itself. Rejecting the hypocrisy of the bleeding hearts of the North, Lamar took a forthright stand on the racial problems that confronted him, a stand that was strongly supported by the colonists themselves. As far as the Mexicans were concerned, he advocated the Mexican government should be given a final chance to negotiate a boundary and peace with Texas. If they did not, the Mexicans should be brought to their senses by knocking them to their knees. As far as the Indians were concerned, he considered them as merely trespassing red vermin on Texas soil. In this outlook, Lamar invented nothing new. The notion that these savages were tenants at will, without inherent title to American soil, and the White Man might dispossess them without formal legal action, was already firmly imbedded in American thought that had already acquired the legitimacy of two hundred years of history.

Lamar stated bluntly that the Indians, the Mexicans and the White Man could never live peacefully in the same territory. "Nature forbids it." He revived the Texas Rangers and inaugurated a firm policy of driving all the Indians and Mexicans out of Texas, a policy eagerly supported by the majority of the White Texans. Not only was it his objective to drive out the more peaceful Cherokees living on Texas soil, but it became governmental policy to pursue and destroy the more warlike Indians who made repeated forays from the north and the west. The attitude of the Texas settlers was to exterminate all Indians, that the only good Indian was a dead Indian. They called them red vermin, red niggers, and realized that their farms and settlements would never be safe until the Indian menace was completely destroyed once and for all.

From its very beginning, the Texas Republic had been campaigning for annexation into the United States, only to be spurned by such abolitionists as John Quincy Adams and other eastern anti-slavery advocates. When, in 1844, James K. Polk was elected president, a new hero entered the arena in Washington. Polk favored American expansion "from sea to shining sea" and in late December of 1845 the aspiration of most Texans was realized. Texas became a state of the Union, much to the relief of its inhabitants.

By this time, the Mexican threat on Texas’ southern borders had become more abrasive and the Texas financial situation was in chaos. Soon after annexation, the United States, under President Polk, declared war against Mexico. In the ensuing war, 1846-48, the White Americans thoroughly trounced the Mestizo Mexicans on their home territory, although the White Man was repeatedly outnumbered in men and artillery in every battle. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and President Polk, whom we Creators regard as the greatest of American presidents, gained for the White Man the western third of the United States, Including California, Arizona, New Mexico and other territories, as well as assuring the security of Texas.

 

President Polk died (1849) shortly after then end of his one term. After the war with Mexico, in which the Texas Rangers played a heroic and significant part, the people of Texas re-assessed their situation. Instead of the government helping to protect the White colonists from the marauding Mexicans south of the Rio Grande and from the fierce Indian raids from the west and north, the policy of the Feds in Washington was to do neither. The government in Washington, in fact, made the slavery issue its main preoccupation, and since Texas was a slave state, Texas was looked upon with disfavor. It made arrangements for Indian reservations on Texas territory, and forbade Federal troops from pursuing Mexican raiders across the Rio Grande. Meanwhile, the Texans and the Texas Rangers beefed up their own limited forces, wondering all the while whose side their "new" government was on. 

This abrasive situation continued for another 13 years. For 30 years the Jews, the Rothschilds, and the eastern bankers had fomented a virulent campaign of hatred against the slave-owning southern states. The Jews were now orchestrating one of the most notorious and successful examples of their "Divide and Conquer" techniques, the North against the South. After a whole generation of detailed planning, conniving and conspiring, they found a most willing spokesman to lead their assault. Shortly after Abraham Lincoln was elected, the Civil War broke out in April of 1861. As planned, it proved to be the most tragic, destructive and insane war in American history. It devastated the South, including Texas, and changed forever the mentality of the White Race.

Although only a small portion of the war took place on Texas soil, nevertheless the Texans contributed heavily to its efforts and incurred disastrous losses in men killed and wounded. When it was over, Texas, along with the other Southern states, became occupied territory, occupied by a hostile, hateful, Jew-controlled Federal government. On June 19, 1865, General Gordon Granger of the Union Army landed in Texas. Some 52,000 bluecoats were sent to the border (southern) area alone, to rule, humiliate and tyrannize the White population. Their Texan former government was declared null and void, their plantations and farms were devastated. The niggers, of which there were now 200,000 in Texas, ran rampant. Although these niggers were illiterate, dumb and savage, they, along with the northern carpet baggers became the electorate and the rulers. Texas was now under military rule, whether they liked it or not. Niggers now terrorized cities such as Victoria, burned down some towns such as Brenham. The Union troops jeeringly stood by and condoned such atrocities. The White Texans, it seemed were now helpless to defend themselves and were ruled by the most vicious and hateful enemies – the niggers and the Jew controlled JOG, the Jewish Occupational Government.

For nine years these stalwart Texans endured these humiliations, atrocities and thievery of their liberties and their properties. Then by 1873 they finally got their act together and having thoroughly learned their lesson of fraud, manipulation and chicanery from their oppressors, they finally ousted JOG’s tyrannical Governor E.J. Davis, and replaced him with their own man, Richard Coke, although they had to break down the door of the Governor’s office to do so. They also now replaced the legislature with members of the former rebel army, they abolished the dreaded "state police" of the JOG, and wrote themselves a new constitution.

One of the notable features of this new constitution was its limitations of powers of the government. The Texans had learned a hard lesson and they instinctively distrusted government, all government. They now no longer looked to government and what it could do for them, but agonizingly realized what government could do to them. The powers of the governor of Texas were now one of the weakest in the country.

The Indian and the Mexican problems were still very real in this badly devastated state. The Indian raids, severe during the war, continued with increased fury after the surrender of the Confederates. From 1865 to Aug. 5, 1867, reports from county judges show that 163 persons were killed by Indians, 43 carried away into captivity. In this matter, too, the Texans took a firm hand. They reinvigorated their Texas Rangers, and under the capable leadership of Colonel Randal Mackenzie on the western frontier with 1000 Rangers in command of the Frontier Battalion, he destroyed the Indian tribes, using the tactics of hot pursuit wherever it would lead. They organized a Ranger Special Force on the Rio Grande under the leadership of the famous Leander H. McNelly to bring the Mexican depredations to a halt on that frontier.

By 1880, these heroic Texas Rangers had done their job and done it well. The last settler had been killed by Indians and the last Indian shot by the Texas Rangers. The frontier was secure. We now come to analyze the situation as it exists today in Texas, and in the United States. The Civil War put the Jews and their money power in flagrant control in Washington and in the state Capitals. They have remained in power ever since, the sinister and hidden enemy of not only the Southern Whites, but all White people. They have been diabolically clever in using their vast financial resources to expand that power and to enslave the White Race all over the world, using the White Race itself as a tool in their vicious technique of Divide and Conquer.

Today our main enemy is still JOG, and not much has changed, except now the Indians and the Mexicans are not our only threat. Now the Mexican horde has been increased to flood proportions, but it has also been augmented with Cubans, Haitians, Hindus, Pakistanis, Chinese, Japanese and hordes of other alien mud races. Like the situation in Texas a century ago, JOG is doing nothing to stop the invasion. On the contrary it has opened the doors wide and is encouraging the mud flood, rewarding it with welfare and subsidization after these parasites get here. All this at the White Mans expense, and aimed at the destruction of the White Race.

What can we do about it? What can we learn from the Texans who cleansed the muds out of their territory by 1880?

1. The first thing we can learn is that the cleansing action, heroic as it was then, was not permanent. Today there are more Mexicans in Texas, (as well as California, Arizona, New Mexico and other states) than there were in Mexico a century ago. And they are still coming in droves.

2. The reason we have not stopped the mud flood is because the White Race has never gotten their act together to extirpate the real cause – the Jewish virus which was the cause of the Civil War, and a host of other wars (W.W. I, W.W. II), all of which have been devastating to the White Race.

3. The reason we, the White Race, have succumbed to the deadly Jewish virus is because of our blindly clinging to the destructive Jewish mind-scrambler, namely Christianity, which teaches us that we must love our enemies, and that the Jews are Gods chosen.

4. The solution is what the C.O.T.C. has advocated repeatedly: we need a racial religion of our own, based on reality and the survival, expansion and advancement of our own kind. With Creativity we now have such a religion, one around which we can now rally the total White Race and cleanse the world of the expanding mud races with the same zeal and determination as the Texas Rangers did in the last century.

Ben Klassen
Founder Church Of The Creator

 

 

 

 

ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY #75

NOV 18AC (1991)

 

 

 

KREMATOR ... Song 88 (Video)

                             Banned on YouTube #45
                              KREMATOR ... Song 88

The Informant ..... By Brother Ken

The Informant:

See I have been in this movement a LONG time. I've learned to be cautious and aware of people talking. Even at my own meetings and parties. If anything sounded suspect you were kicked out. I don't care if I hurt your feelings. I'm protecting myself and friends. I knew at some time informants\snitches\agents would come through. This is the risk we take in the movement. I didn't care because I am 100% LEGAL. You won't trip me up. But they sent the Agent Provocateur anyways. This maggot hung around for about 18 months. Getting a paycheck with his FBI buddies to report that I was working everyday. Besides Intel on flyer drops, parties or protests they had nothing. They want dirt and illegal crap.

So when you are paid to do a job and you suck at it you have to save face. Which means lie and create a problem. This informant would come out anytime he was asked. He would go above and beyond to show loyalty. This guy put me in federal prison for a year over lies whereas I had to go to trial and face a jury. I beat that case because I am not reckless, I'm not violent, I don't talk stupid and I have the best family and friends.

I was with North East White Pride at the time. We were going to a meeting. Guy in the back was talking about Air Soft competitions. Little did we know the informants car was wired. Cameras and recording devices in the vents. The convo we had was different to the interpretation of what was played for the jury. A conversation about Air Soft paintballs turned in to a racial holy war convo according to government verbiage. They projected a revolution to people over an Air Soft game recorded YouTube video page. Paramilitary training they called it. Might as well had super soakers. Would have been the same story. This is how low the government goes to take its mark.

They will go at lengths to seal us. They will twist our date in order to be a Judas. This informant came to family dinners. We drank, partied, rallied and hung out for coffee. But I seen signs. A normal legal life is not what gets them paid. They are in it to reduce a charge of help someone else By All Means Necessary. We are a target and expendable.

If someone is talking reckless, violence, illegal activity, or murder etc..... There is your provocateur aka agent. Any smart Nationalist knows better. Don't bait into silly conversations and don't argue over silly conversations. Don't waste your time. The provocateur is there to PROVOKE us. This is their paycheck. When nothing is happening they create a problem. Think for yourself. 14SW

 

 

 

The Informant part 2: The demise of trust

Like a ball people can roll. It is sad but unfortunate, Federal agents PROVOKE our weaknesses. They analyze our lives and know what makes us tick. It's their traitorous job. It can be your illness, woman/man, kids even your f'n pet. But they will find a way to get under your skin. I've seen, watched and warned comrades of the dangerous comments and scenarios they were embarking in. Too bad they didn't listen to good advice of always staying Legal. Talk is dangerous and loose lips are loose minds. For those of us who respect this cause and truly understand it...SANBOG is a real thing.

Trust is something etched into your heart and soul. It can't be touched. Some people are very strong willed but most are weak. For those who have been to prison you know the war and struggle there. It's a whole new battle zone. No one likes it but when you end up there whether it was Noble or out of stupidity; it's a different life. Some can handle.it but some big bad boy talkers are weak.

Here is my point. People Break. You have to watch for signs. Never engage in illegal conversations. That's the first trap that people fall for. Do background checks even though it's not guaranteed efficient but it's a step. Know people's demeanor and style.......

This is my main point here. You can know someone your whole life. That's cute. But how many people want to or can handle going to prison and losing freedom? Not many.

Situation: Your best friend/activist/right hand who has a wife, good job and kid. He's on his way to see you. No clue he was on the Fed radar. He gets pulled over by FBI on the way to your place. He's threatened with a trumped up charge of losing his family and everything by doing 20 years in federal prison unless........he turns on you with a wire and entrapment b/s. What do you think will happen? People turn quick. They are human and break like glass. All talk no walk. Be on guard of any suspicious conversations or actions by even your closest. Anyone can become a Fed informant in a split second due to a threat. Even illegally threatened people will save themselves and throw you under a bus.

Learn from past mistakes. Thank you. 14SW

 

 

Brother Ken

Jan 2020

 

 

 

ELISE HATEGAN'S AFFIDAVIT EXPOSES SMEAR ARTIST BEHIND ANTI-RACIST CANADA BLOGSPOT ...By Paul Fromm

Elise Hategan was a one-time, short-time member of the White Nationalist Heritage front. She flipped sides, ratted out some of her former associates and became an anti-racist writer, lesbian and now a Jew, in no particular order. She has launched a lawsuit against fellow Heritage Front recruit turned anti-racist Elizabeth Moore, her one-time friend, and Bernie Farber. Hategan and Moore have shopped around their Heritage Front experiences and conversions for a quarter of a century to receptive media and Jewish audiences. Hategan now believes Moore, with the assistance of former Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Bernie Farber, has wrongfully appropriated some of her experiences for Moore's benefit.

 

Along the way, there are some important secrets revealed.

 

Most important is the identity of "Nosferatu 200" the persona behind the online smear sheet Anti-Racist Canada Blogspot. It turns out the smear meister, who has "outed" many people and damaged many people's lives and reputations is an Alberta grade school teacher, Kurt Phillips.

 

An affidavit is a sworn statement. It has not been tested in court.

 

Here's a quick guide to the Hategan affidavit.

 

1. Who is Nosferatu 200 who runs Anti-Racist Canada Blogspot? -- Kurt Phillips. At Paragraph 320, Hategan explains: ". In my 4 years of friendship with Kurt Phillips and as part of the ARC Collective, I supplied information (such as names and photos of Heritage Front members), took photos and wrote several blog pieces that were posted on the ARC blog. I supported the website and Kurt’s sleuthing activities by providing opinions and verbal/written support whenever necessary. We advised and confided in each other on numerous occasions, both via email, telephone and in person, and had conversations that reached far beyond the topic of racism and white supremacy. Kurt also sent me gifts and care packages on multiple occasions, I sent him one package in return, and he contributed financially to my book fundraising efforts

 

2. Close ties between Bernie Farber and CSIS agent provocateur Grant Bristow , at para 300-305

 

3. Warren Kinsella's machination & Elise Hategan, Bernie Farber and Elizabeth Moore, at para. 306-318.

 

4. ARC's Kurt Phillips joins Canadian Anti-Hate Network. CAHN helps fund ARC. Richard Warman of CAHN pressures Elise Hategan to remove Twitter references to Phillips' identity. at para. 326-332.

 

Journalist Keane Bexte who works for Rebel Media identified Phillips as a social studies  teacher ……...

 

Now, that we finally have this sleazy coward's identity, his dozens of victims -- people who, over the years, he's smeared, mocked, doxed and exposed, people whose lives he's damaged -- should carefully consider their legal options. Phillips likes to say he opposes violence, but the Antifa who gain much of their information from ARC actively practise violence. And, until very recently, both were masked, that is, their identity was disguised and, for very good reason, because, as mother used to say, "they were up to no good."

 

Oddly enough, I am not demanding that Phillips be fired from his job as a school teacher. I've been down that route. In the early 1990s, I was the target of a persistent campaign to have me fired from my position as an English instructor with the Peel Board of Education. There was never any question that I was a competent and effective teacher. Indeed, my Director of Education at the start of the six year ordeal called me "an exemplary teacher." I did not bring my political views into the classroom. Even an NDP Minister of Education refused to lift my teaching certificate because he KNEW I kept my political and teaching lives separate. In the end, the lobbying pressure became too strong and, in February 1997, I was fired for the non-violent expression on my own time of my support for free speech and my opposition to this country's catastrophic immigration policies. I was fired because, in the words of my district union leader, "the day after you are fired, the phone calls will stop." This put a man with a wife and young family in a very difficult financial position.

 

My firing followed closely on the firing of a fellow teacher, a devout Christian gentleman and writer, Malcolm Ross of New Brunswick. After a similar campaign of media demonization and intense lobbying by Jewish groups, he was dismissed for writings critical of Zionism. Needless to say, to, too, never brought his views into the classroom. He'd been hailed as an effective and compassionate teacher of difficult students and Native kids.

 

Thus, I believe a teacher is entitled to a private life and to the expression on his own time of his political views, however reprehensible. Phillips activities on ARC are evil and a disgrace. He was part of the mob that eventually took down (at least temporarily) a satirical and vibrant Christian newspaper YOUR WARD NEWS  
 So, does he deserve to keep his job. Reluctantly, I say "yes", if, and this is a big IF, after a through investigation the Catholic school board determines:

 

1. He did not bring his views into the classroom and indoctrinate his young charges;

 

2. He did not use school equipment or his work hours for his work on the ARC website;

 

3. His presence did not create a "poisoned environment" for children from families with less leftist views than his. Drumheller is an intensely conservative area -- a stronghold of the old Social Credit Party, years ago, and more recently of the Reform Party and the socially conservative wing of the Conservative Party. Did the children of such parents feel safe and welcome in his classroom. Only a thorough investigation will tell.

 

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

---

CAFE

 

 

Rev Matt Hale ... Letter to Federal Bureau of Prisons / Office of Internal Affairs

Federal Bureau of Prisons
Office of Internal Affairs
320 Ist Street, NW  Room 600
Washington, DC 20534

This letter is to inform you of the misconduct of Attorney James Wiencek, Rudy Marques, Amy Kelly and Warden B. True. 

Attorney James Wiencek has instructed Supermax staff, including Warden B. True, Special Investigative Services (SIS) LT. Amy Kelley, and SIS Technician Rudy Marques to steal chapter Six of Matthew Hale's ongoing book from the U.S. mail, thereby violating both state and federal criminal law. Thereby Wiencek has engaged in a criminal conspiracy with these individuals. Wiencek has committed his crimes specifically for the purpose of suppressing prisoner Matthew Hale's First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, the reason being that he personally does not like the particular speech in question. Therefore, Wiencek has betrayed the oath he took to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States, a requirement of federal employment.

In light of Wiencek's crimes and violation (betrayal) of his oath of loyalty to the Constitution of the United States, he obviously has no business practicing law at the Supermax prison in any capacity and should be removed from his post as "Senior Attorney" immediately. Lawyers who advise Justice Department employees to commit theft and violate the constitutional rights of prisoners to express their opinions in book form—said speech specifically protected by Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.,S. 396, 413-418 (1974) — should not be allowed to be employed by the U.S. Justice Department. (The mere expression of racial views, even of inflammatory, cannot be lawfully censored in outgoing mail.) ( It is believed, furthermore, that Wiencek has instructed Supermax employees to steal ("confiscate") the rest of Hale's book chapters that are currently in the mail, as well.

The above individuals are guilty of specific harassment and persecution of prisoner Matthew Hale at the Supermax prison in Florence CO.—that they are mistreating him and his book simply because they disagree with him and the beliefs he expresses. Instead of honoring the fact that Hale has the right to believe as he pleases and express those beliefs to the outside world, they have established a thought police and are willing to commit crimes and other violations of law to enforce their own opinions. They know that their actions are criminal and unconstitutional and yet they perform them anyway. 

 

 

 

Rev Matt Hale ... Letter to Federal Bureau of Prisons / Central Office H.Q.

Kathleen Hawk Sawyer
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Central Office H.Q.
320 First St. NW
Washington, DC 20534

The employees at Supermax prison in Florence, CO are committing absolute lawlessness regarding prisoner mail! Specifically, Lt. Amy Kelly runs "SIS". Delayed mail/ stolen mail/ banned mail. Such conduct should not be tolerated.

Attorney James Wiencek has instructed Supermax staff, including Warden B. True, Special Investigative Services (SIS) LT. Amy Kelley, and SIS Technician Rudy Marques to steal chapter Six of Matthew Hale's ongoing book from the U.S. mail, thereby violating both state and federal criminal law. Thereby Wiencek has engaged in a criminal conspiracy with these individuals. Wiencek has committed his crimes specifically for the purpose of suppressing prisoner Matthew Hale's First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, the reason being that he personally does not like the particular speech in question. Therefore, Wiencek has betrayed the oath he took to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States, a requirement of federal employment.

In light of Wiencek's crimes and violation (betrayal) of his oath of loyalty to the Constitution of the United States, he obviously has no business practicing law at the Supermax prison in any capacity and should be removed from his post as "Senior Attorney" immediately. Lawyers who advise Justice Department employees to commit theft and violate the constitutional rights of prisoners to express their opinions in book form—said speech specifically protected by Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.,S. 396, 413-418 (1974) — should not be allowed to be employed by the U.S. Justice Department. (The mere expression of racial views, even if inflammatory, cannot be lawfully censored in outgoing mail.) ( It is believed, futhermore, that Wiencek has instructed Supermax employees to steal ("confiscate") the rest of Hale's book chapters that are currently in the mail, as well.

 

 

 

 

Rev Matt Hale ... Letter to the Supreme Court of Colorado / Attorney Regulation Counsel

Supreme Court of Colorado
Attorney Regulation Counsel
1300 Broadway, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80203


This is a letter regarding the unethical behavior of Attorney James Wiencek specifically, "Senior Attorney" at the Supermax prison in Florence CO.

Attorney James Wiencek has instructed Supermax staff, including Warden B. True, Special Investigative Services (SIS) LT. Amy Kelley, and SIS Technician Rudy Marques to steal chapter Six of Matthew Hale's ongoing book from the U.S. mail, thereby violating both state and federal criminal law. Thereby Wiencek has engaged in a criminal conspiracy with these individuals. Wiencek has committed his crimes specifically for the purpose of suppressing prisoner Matthew Hale's First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, the reason being that he personally does not like the particular speech in question. Therefore, Wiencek has betrayed the oath he took to uphold, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States, a requirement of federal employment. In addition, Matthew Hale's civil rights are being violated.

James Wiencek's responsibility at Supermax prison is to make sure that prisoners rights are upheld, not violated. He has thus  betrayed his oath, committed crimes, and abused his power.  This precedent has given clear notice to Wiencek of the illegality of his actions and yet he doesn't care. ( Again, racial beliefs are protected in their expression.) Lawyers are required to honor the constitutional rights of others more than than anybody else since they take the oath specifically to that document. It is no argument for Wiencek to claim as he has that the BOP has the right to suppress Matt's book when it clearly doesn't under the law. 

In light of Wiencek's crimes and violation (betrayal) of his oath of loyalty to the Constitution of the United States, he obviously has no business practicing law at the Supermax prison in any capacity and should be removed from his post as "Senior Attorney" immediately. Lawyers who advise Justice Department employees to commit theft and violate the constitutional rights of prisoners to express their opinions in book form—said speech specifically protected by Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.,S. 396, 413-418 (1974) — should not be allowed to be employed by the U.S. Justice Department. (The mere expression of racial views, even of inflammatory, cannot be lawfully censored in outgoing mail.) ( It is believed, futhermore, that Wiencek has instructed Supermax employees to steal ("confiscate") the rest of Hale's book chapters that are currently in the mail, as well. His  law license should be revoked on the grounds that he has stolen private property,  Matthew Hale's (chapters of his book), and has advised Supermax employees to do the same.

ANGRY ARYANS ..... Can I Sit Next 2 U (Video)

                               Banned on YouTube #44
                    ANGRY ARYANS … Can I Sit Next 2 U

How We Will Build a Whiter and Brighter World....By Ben Klassen

 

Legally and Progressively

How We will Build a Whiter and Brighter World

During the last six months In particular, we at the World Center here have been besieged by an increasing number of reporters from the Jewsmedia. We have had any number of reporters from prominent out of state newspapers writing feature articles about us, some with our cooperation, many without. We have been featured in a number of TV episodes from Jacksonville to Denver to New York – "Inside Edition," "Geraldo," Maury Povitch" and a number of others.

There is one constant norm in all these articles, TV programs and interviews. They are hostile to our creed and program. The dominant obsession is to smear us and depict us as being violence-prone. Whereas it is we who have repeatedly been attacked, in true Jewish fashion they try to turn the facts upside down. Some of the basic questions I now ask any reporters before I will talk to them are usually in this order:

(a) Are you a Jew? If the answer is yes, I terminate the interview at the very inception. Next I ask them if they are black, with the same conclusion.

(b) Have you been sent here to do a smear job on the Church of the Creator?

The latter is actually not too relevant a question, since invariably they will lie to us and claim that they will give us an impartial and balanced view as they see it. Usually I will acquiesce and say, alright, we will answer your questions, but stick to your commitment. Give us an honest report and we will answer your questions frankly and honestly. We have nothing to hide.

Question (a) is usually answered honestly. By now they know that we will not tolerate talking to a Jewish or a black reporter, and therefore the media does not send such down to us. However, every once in a while they do slip in a Jew that denies he is one of the tribe.

Question (b) is really a charade, a farce. The reporter will lie every time. We know that they have been sent here to do an out and out hatchet job, and they know that we know. So we usually proceed anyway, and they never disappoint us. They invariably come out with a hostile smear job. Why do we cooperate? Well, at our stage, as Adolf said some seventy years ago, almost any publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell our name right. The more people hear about us, sooner or later the White people will sort out the true facts. It is our job to see to it that they get them, once they know we exist.

 

The questions usually run the same course, starting with: what is Creativity? One standard answer is, Creativity is a racial religion structured for the survival, expansion, and advancement of the White Race. How many members do you have? We don’t disclose numbers since we are usually accused of either overstating or understating such numbers, and in any case, we don’t want to get embroiled in the numbers game. We don’t have an accurate count of all our members, supporters and sympathizers, and in any event, it is not relevant that we do. We prefer to talk about our creed and program. We want to build a Whiter and Brighter World.
 

It is at this point that the reporter usually begins to become venal. After a discussion of what is our definition of the White Race and who are the "mud" races, they will ask the question: How are you going to "cleanse your territory" as you put it, of the mud races? Is it your intention to kill all the Jews and the blacks?

We must keep in mind that the reporter came here to talk to us for basically two reasons: (a) to write an article about Creativity in order to smear us, in short, to do a hatchet job, (b) to gather intelligence information to convey on to the files of the ADL, and the Jewish master computer in Tel Aviv. We must also remember that besides trying to portray us as haters, they will try very hard to make us look like a movement that promotes violence. In this latter attempt to make us look violence-prone they will use every remote linkage they possibly can contrive, and nothing is too remote for these lying prostitutes of the Jewish media. Keeping these ground rules in mind we must be very careful and very precise in our answers to these reporters, who will inevitably zero in on the key question: Just what are you going to do with the Jews and the niggers that are already here? Are you going to kill them?

And our answer is: no, we have no plans for killing anybody. We are a non-violent religious movement. We have a comprehensive plan as to how to achieve a Whiter and Brighter World. Every step along the way is legal, constitutional and non-violent as we will detail to you. Here is how we plan to proceed, step by step:

Step No. 1. We mean to build our racial religious movement legally and constitutionally by employing and enjoying the same rights as does every other religious group in America, by means of propaganda, by means of persuasion, by means of organization. Instead of adulating fictitious spooks in the sky, our religion is based on Racial Loyalty. There is nothing new about Racial Loyalty. If you look at the real world around you, you will see that the niggers practice it, the Jews practice it, the Indians practice it, the Muslims practice it, the Japanese practice Racial Loyalty. In fact, just about every race in the world practices Racial Loyalty and has for thousands of years. The only difference is that we are now talking about White Racial Loyalty. But there is nothing illegal about being White and there is nothing Illegal about White Racial Loyalty.

Step No. 2. We plan to build our movement to such dimensions that we will be able to take control of our government from out of the slimy hands of the Jews who now have it and thereby take control of our own destiny. Nothing illegal about that. After all, the White people built this great country, and at this point in time are still the majority. What is more fair and more legal than the White people having control of their own destiny, rather than a small minority of Talmudic Jews? How do we plan to accomplish this?

Step No. 3. We plan to accomplish it by promoting Racial Loyalty to the White Race, by informing, arousing, uniting and organizing the mighty potential of our White Racial Comrades. We mean to polarize the White Race under one language, Latin, one religion, Creativity and build one mighty powerhouse so that we, not the Jews, will be in charge of our own affairs. Nothing illegal about that.

Step No. 4. Having done the above, we will then further practice Racial Loyalty and take our next step. In accordance with Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9 of our Sixteen Commandments, we will boycott the Jews. We will boycott them in business and break them financially. We will boycott them in politics and drive them from out of government. We will boycott them in education, in the news media, and every other place in our cultural life. There is nothing illegal about using the boycott either. The Jews have been doing it for thousands of years. The Arabs have been boycotting Israel for the last forty years. Our government (JOG) has been using sanctions (an extreme form of boycott) against South Africa, against Iraq, against Iran, against Germany in the 1930’s and against any and every other country they didn’t like. Numerous Jew controlled organizations (such as NOW) even today use the boycott against such states as Arizona because they did not acquiesce to declaring a legal holiday in honor of Martin Lucifer Koon. So, we can conclude there is nothing illegal about using the boycott. However, if used by a united, polarized White Race, believe me, it can be and will be extremely effective.


Step No. 5.
Having achieved control of our own destiny, we will then simultaneously stop subsidizing the niggers In this country, stop subsidizing the parasitic state of Israel, and in fact, stop subsidizing all the other 120 some countries that JOG has piled on the backs of the working White American taxpayers. We will simply let all these Jews, niggers, parasites and freeloaders shift for themselves and wither on the vine.

Having done the above, we will let Nature take its inevitable course In phasing out the problem. For hundreds of millions of years Nature has followed its wise but ruthless course of Survival of the Fittest, which also means the demise of those unfit to cope for themselves. In the endless struggle of each species to survive In competition to other like species, Nature has persistently used the culling process, of weeding out of the weak, the deformed, the sickly and the mentally Incompetent. It is only in the last half of the 20th century that the White race, misguided by the evil hand of the Jew, has subverted this purgative action of cleansing the genetic defects of a species gene pool. By subsidizing the lazy, the shiftless, the incompetent and rendering massive aid to all the parasites, the scum and the free-loaders of the world, we have greatly multiplied the defectives at the expense of he competent, until now we are reaching the breaking point. In our program we mean to reverse this sick and idiotic process. All this, too, is strictly legal.

Step No. 6. We are now well on the way towards the salvation and redemption of the great White Race. Our next step is to then aggressively cleanse our territory of the still lingering mud races. The first step is to forcibly expel the some 10 million illegal Mexicans. This too, is strictly legal, and it is a dereliction of duty that our JOG government has not done so a long time ago. Along with these illegal Mestizos, we will also expel all other alien muds – Haitians, Pakistanis, Jews and whatever.

Next, we will institute a program of repatriating all blacks back to Africa whether they are tenth generation "Americans’ or not. This too is not a new idea by any means, and repatriation of unassimilable mixed peoples has been practiced by any number of nations throughout history, both recent and ancient.

1. The Egyptians drove the Jews from out of their land 3500 years ago when the latter became unbearably obnoxious (as with the Holohoax, the Jews have twisted history around and claim they left Egypt voluntarily after the Egyptians tried to keep them. What an inverted lie!)
 

2. All of the French in the colony of Acadia (In present day Nova Scotia) were deported by the victorious British in 1755. Most of these were deported to Louisiana, but many scattered elsewhere. (Read Longfellow’s Evangeline.)

3. In our own American history, we moved any number of Indian tribes to other less desirable, less inhabited areas. Some were moved and confined to reservations, some, like the Cherokees were moved en masse from North Carolina to Oklahoma. This was a matter of the conquering White Man cleansing the territory and making room for his own people, a process that was repeated time and again.
 

4. When the White Man conquered Texas, they organized the Texas Rangers and launched a powerful (and successful) drive to expel every Mexican and Indian from what was now conquered White Man’s territory. This was How the West was Won.

5. The Turks even resorted to extensive massacres of the Armenian population in 1894-96, again in 1909, and again in 1915, the latter running into millions.

6. After World War II, the victorious democratic’ Allies, led by America, Russia and Britain, routed, moved and/or killed 13 million Germans from their eastern homelands and crowded them into the western areas of a remnant Germany, all at the bequest of the Communist Jews.

7. Also, after W.W. II the Jews (with the help of American JOG) drove the native Palestinian Arabs from a homeland they had lived in for two thousand years. This in order to make room for the parasitic state of Israel. With their Uzi machine guns in hand, the Jews are still at it today driving the Arabs out of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. All this with the subsidization of Israel by the American taxpayers to the tune of four billion a year, now being anted-up to more than ten billion. I ask you, Whitey, how long are you going to stand for this kind of rapacious atrocity?

8. The niggers in Africa, with the help of (our own!) JOG and in accordance with the Jewish plan of exterminating the White Race are driving the White people out of Africa. Is it fair? If so, it is just as fair to drive the Jews and niggers out of the White Mans territory, is it not? But let us now look at the specific controversy of resettling the niggers here in America and moving them out of our land. This problem is certainly not new and the solution to it was not invented by the Church of the Creator. It is an insidious problem of long standing that should have been solved a long time ago, and several of our most astute White statesmen and leaders have strongly advocated the expulsion of these black animals from out of our midst.

1. Thomas Jefferson, certainly one of the most fervent advocates of liberty, clearly realized the race problem as early as 1811, and formulated plans to have the niggers deported onto foreign soil, preferably Africa. This was at the urging of the Virginia legislature and its then Governor. James Monroe.

2. As a result of this initial Impetus for the deportation of Africans, the American Colonization Society was formed in 1817. Among its high officers were such distinguished leaders as Charles Carroiton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Henry Clay, John Marshall, Wm. H. Crawford, John Randolph, Daniel Webster and Andrew Jackson. In 1822 a large tract of land was secured on the west coast of Africa and it was called Liberia. Between 1820 and 1831 some 2,228 niggers were transported to this territory.

Having shown the feasibility of their plan, the Society in 1827 asked Congress to give its support and financial aid for the continuation of this highly important project. However, the hidden hand of the Jew was already in evidence even then and Congress did nothing. The Jews have been vigorously sabotaging every plan for the deportation of the blacks in our midst ever since. They want the niggers to stay and mongrelize the White Race. The Colonization Society nevertheless continued its efforts and did, in fact, move 20,000 niggers from America to Africa. But with the Jews blocking their every move and Congress not giving its official support, it gradually declined in effectiveness.

3. The racial problem festered on and finally exploded into the devastation of the War between the States, 1861-65, a terrible tragedy for all White Americans, especially for the South. Abraham Lincoln, also realizing the seriousness of the problem of having two completely divergent and

incompatible races living in the same land, strongly advocated moving the blacks out, and instituted a Bureau of Emigration to begin their deportation. He advocated one colony in Haiti, and another in Colombia. However, again because of Jewish opposition and since Lincoln was assassinated at the end of the war, both of these projects were stymied. Had he not been assassinated (by the Jews) the chances are that a meaningful deportation program would have been pursued by the U.S. government under the leadership of Lincoln.

4. Briefly, let me summarize other prominent American supporters, advocates and promoters:

(a) President Millard Fillmore presented a plan to Congress for the emigration of all blacks as early as 1852. Congress ignored it.

(b) President Ulysses S. Grant advocated a similar program.

(c) Marcus Garvey, a black mulatto, in the 1930’s organized the Universal Negro Improvement Association advocating the resettlement of blacks to Africa. He enlisted the support of 6,000,000 black members, but the Federal government under the control of Roosevelt and the Jews hounded him, framed him, imprisoned him and stymied any such constructive action at every turn.

(d) U.S. Senator Theodore Bilbo spent most of political life advocating the resettlement of blacks to Africa. He introduced a bill in the Senate (April 24, 1939) to make this possible, and secured the support and signatures of 2-1/2 million blacks. Again, Roosevelt and the Jews killed the bill.

(e) Senator Langer introduced a bill in 1957 providing aid for blacks desirous of migrating to Liberia.

(f) Malcolm X, a black mulatto leader, strongly advocated the back to Africa movement. He, too, was assassinated.

(g) Louis Farrakhan is strongly advocating separation of the races, to the fervent vocal support of millions of niggers. However, he is now demanding that the separated niggers be given a major piece of America itself.

The upshot of all previous history is that the racial problem is becoming ever more heated, more violent, and will not go away. The only feasible solution to this lingering cancer is to ship all the niggers in America back to Africa. Once we, the White Race, have destroyed the Jewish stranglehold, and have gained control of our own destiny and of our own government, the problem can be solved. This we will do with, I believe, the overwhelming support of the niggers themselves. Let me state it again – it is not the niggers that are blocking the solution, it is not the White people, it is the Jews. Let us now again take up this question of "fairness," and is it fair or is it not fair for one people to drive another out of their territory and occupy it for themselves? As history has shown from time immemorial, this question is entirely moot. History has demonstrated repeatedly and irrevocably that territory Is occupied by those people with the will and the means to conquer the territory they desire, and then held by those capable of, and determined to hold it.


Is it fair? Perhaps not, but history is not fair. Nature is not interested in fairness. The bigger fish eat the smaller fish, the coyotes eat the weaker rabbits and rodents, and on down the food chain. Is it fair? Evidently Nature says it is, and there is only one Law of Nature that predominates in this regard, and that is the Law of Survival of our own species on this Planet Earth. Nature severely punishes with extinction those species that are too lazy, too laggard or too incompetent to take on the struggle for survival. The bottom line is: Eternal struggle is the price of survival. I didn’t make the rules but merely observe and learn from both the lessons of history and the laws of Nature. Having accepted the facts of life, I have no quarrel with reality.

Nor is the moral question of survival of its own kind any problem with any of the races of mankind other than the White Race. In fact, they exalt and glorify their triumph over their enemies, whoever they might be. When one Indian tribe destroyed another they celebrated the extermination of their rivals with great gusto. The Old Testament is full of repeated glorification of how the Jews, with the help of their Jahweh god slew the enemy with the edge of their sword until every man, woman and child had been slain. Even the White Romans, Greeks and Egyptians stated massive celebrations over their victories throughout their history. The Romans shed no tears, felt no pangs of guilt when they finally conquered Carthage after more than a century of hostility. On the contrary, they burned Carthage to the ground and sowed salt in its ruins, and were damned glad they had destroyed an overwhelming threat to their survival. It was only after the treacherous Jews inflicted the New Testament brain scrambler on the Gentiles that the White Race was plagued with the so-called morality of guilt and "fairness." We can specifically point to the Sermon on the Mount teachings of "love your enemy," "turn the other cheek," "sell all thou hast and give it to the niggers" for the suicidal origin of this self-destructive idea. (See "The Sermon on the Mount," page 154, A Revolution of Values.)

 
Having thrown all this perfidious and suicidal Jewish advice overboard and established a rational and realistic moral base for our own survival, we are now ready for its next step.

Step No. 7. Ever since Columbus discovered America in 1492, the White Race pursued a vigorous program of expansion and colonization, a healthy Instinct Nature has imbued in all its creatures, whether they be animals, birds, insects or plants. This expansion was first led by the Spaniards and the Portuguese, then rivaled and surpassed by the French, the Dutch and the Anglo-Saxons. There was one major difference between the former and the latter groups. Whereas the Spanish and Portuguese poisoned their gene pool in the New World by interbreeding with the indigenous natives, the Anglo-Saxon group, by and large, did not. The result is (or was) the great country of the United States we once knew, and to the detriment of the Latinos, the mongrelized mix-breeds and mestizos of Mexico and South America.

Be that as it may, this surge of energy by the White Race lasted for some 450 years, then came to an ignominious halt after the suicidal events of W.W. II. Not only did it come to halt, but through the Marshall Plan and the insane American policy of subsidizing all the scum, freeloaders and mud races of the world, we, the White Race are now in full retreat, running before our inferiors, apologizing for our previous success, and thanks to the devilish manipulations of the Jewish Kehilla, we, Nature’s Finest, are now on the road to extinction.

Be it therefore resolved, we, the White Race are now determined to take Step No. 7, the final stage of building a Whiter and Brighter World. We are determined to take up where our White ancestors left off 50 or 100 years ago and resume the colonization program of our illustrious forbearers and expand the domain and territory of our great Race. We now have the moral base on which to proceed, fully backed by our religion, supported by centuries and millenniums of history, and furthermore, by the Eternal Laws of Nature. We need nothing more.



We will make one major change in our future expansion. Instead of conquering new territory and intermingling and exploiting the cheap labor of the natives, we will have none of this nonsense. Instead, by planned and deliberate measures, we will make a clean sweep, one measured addition at a time. In such territories as we colonize we will clear it of the mud races and settle it with White families exclusively. No longer will there be any of the former muddled geographic race mixing. We will settle and digest one segment of territory, then go on to the next, until such time as this beautiful planet will be settled and inhabited by its most deserving heirs, Nature’s Finest.

Only through Creativity can we accomplish such a noble and far-reaching goal. Join with us today!

White People Awake! Save the White Race!

Ben Klassen
Founder Church Of The Creator

ARTICLE TAKEN FROM RACIAL LOYALTY #74
OCT 18AC (1991)