Friday, 23 February 2018

Our Great Potential..Speech (Video)... By PM Costello

A short speech given By PM Costello in Blackpool, England, on 21st October 2017.

                                        THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT

Thursday, 22 February 2018

Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case)...Evidence of Defendant's Current, Unlawful Activity

To read the document in it's entirety see FREE MATT HALE site  Evidence of Defendant's Current, Unlawful Activity

Quotes from Rev Hale contained in the document............

" Please find attached a returned correspondence form that was just delivered to me yesterday, February 13th  (Exhibit A) as well as the correspondence in question to which it pertains (Exhibit B 23 pages double spaced)  I had written this article for distribution to those who believe in my innocence , explaining why I want to be free, the lack of any evidence that I committed a crime, and our ongoing efforts to secure the commutation of my imprisonment at the hands of the great President Donald Trump " 
Why Do I Want to be Free... By Rev Matt Hale    

" Is Hale's expression of his innocence the safety and security concern? Are people less safe and secure by being informed that an innocent man is indeed in prison? Or maybe it was Hale's expression of love for his Mother? His White race? His violin? Nature? Or that he would like to get married and have a family one day? Or maybe it was the expression of his desire to perhaps lead the cause for preservation of  the White race when he is free (free) that is the safety and security concern? "  

" The Defendant and it's employees have repeatedly shown themselves to be reprehensible liars to this court " 

 SUBMITTED... February 14th 2018  


Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Who Do I Want To be Free?...By Rev Matt Hale

         The answer to that question may seem obvious that it need not be forthcoming on my part. After all, I am an innocent man that committed no crime. I have spent 15 years now in prison for something I not only did not do but opposed, and if the so-called "Justice" Department has it's way I'll spend at least another twenty more. I have been a helpless bystander while my dear father and others have died in my absence. What prisoner would not want to regain his freedom? What innocent man would wish to remain behind bars?

          The last time I was free, George W. Bush was in the middle of his first term as President of the United States and Saddam Hussein was still President of Iraq. Strom Thurmond was still in the U.S. Senate. Barack Obama was a little known law professor who has never been elected to public office. Nobody had ever heard of "Facebook," "Twitter," "I-pads," or "I-phones." People still took photos with cameras, not phones for goodness sakes, and I myself was just starting to transition from VHS video tapes to DVDs. A lot can change in 15 years and a lot has. No doubt much will change the next twenty. I would like to be there when it does.

          Those who have been imprisoned themselves for a long period of time for no crime—and in solitary confinement at that—can never quite know what it's like. Justice seems to be like a ghost that you can never get your hands on. It flits about, mocking you, while you remain empty handed. You don't ever want to give up hope but then again you don't want to be a fool either. You realize that the torture of prisoners of war that the politicians like to rail against is nothing compared to the torture  of an innocent man's soul. You can't really relate to your fellow prisoners because they actually committed their crimes and you can't relate to your captors either because they work of course for the very system which wronged you so badly. And so you suffer some days more than others to be sure, while you make the best life for yourself that you can within the four walls that have been allotted to you. You do your best to keep your mind on things other than your predicament. That is all you can do.

          Unlike many innocent prisoners, however, I have been fortunate these years to have the support of so many of you in the free world who have never stopped believing in me, the fact that I committed  no crime, and the cause of our people's future which we all love. For that I am grateful. Most of all though I am grateful to have such a wonderful mother who has stood by me through thick and thin throughout my ordeal, who fights for me all day everyday, and who I only love more and more with each passing hour. Is it wrong for me to have hope that I may be returned to her arms before she to, like my father, meets the fate to which all of us are destined whether we would like it or not? I shudder at the thought that I could lose her while being imprisoned within these walls. I would do anything to avoid that scenario, including the moving of heaven and earth. She deserves her son to be returned to her without any further ado. I deserve her embrace which I have so sorely missed. Is that really too much to ask, my friends?

          I would also like to fulfill my duty as a White man of sound mind and body and find a good wife out there with whom I can continue my line. Is it wrong for me to have visions of my bouncing a little Hale tyke on my knees? What could be more important than our breeding of the next generation?

          As for the facts of my case, let's just be real clear: there is zero evidence that I ever "solicited" somebody to murder anybody and thus the charge is a sick lie on its face. I challenge anyone to show I ordered, instructed,or even encouraged the FBI's highly paid agent provocateur to commit a murder, least of all the murder of the judge who had ruled in our favor. It can't be done and that's all there is to it. I have been horribly wronged and anybody with a scintilla of sense and justice knows it. Anybody can say anything about anyone but that doesn't make it true! What matters rather are the facts and the facts are in my favor. Furthermore, I was given a wildly excessive sentence in a case where nobody was hurt or could have been hurt. Isn't 15 years for a totally made up "crime" long enough then? Is it really necessary to imprison a man for forty years for a totally cooked up government "plot"?

          To be sure, I have done as well as any man in my shoes could. I was blessed by the genes of my parents with a good mind and have put that mind to the best use that I could these years. I have written two of the greatest books for the future of our White people that have ever been written—Ending White Slavery and The Racial Loyalist Manifesto—and am working right now on a third. Still, the fact remains that it is the free world where I can help our people the most. Merely writing books, I fear, is not going to save our White Race. Rather, the right direction, the right organization, and the right hands—, dynamic leadership is what we need if our kind is to survive in this world. Many of you believe that I have what it takes to provide that leadership but I obviously need to be free in order to do it; I can't do it from this prison cell where I am stymied and harassed by my captors at every turn. Rather, I need to obtain my freedom in order to exercise whatever leadership ability I possess. So, it behoves all who care about the future of our White Race in this world to fight for that freedom, not only for my sake but for yours. I am more than willing to lead our cause to victory, if only I am given the chance!

          One thing is likewise for sure: if I have the strength of will to endure decades of solitary confinement and other persecutions for no crime, I have the strength of will to lead our cause to victory as a free man. You can put your faith in Matt Hale because he has justified your faith all these years. I don't falter and I don't quit. I have never been broken by our enemies and I never will be. I have no interest whatever in "ego" or petty rivalries but only the task at hand. I am above that which bogs down most human beings. I live and breath the Racial Loyalist cause. Hense I have the ability to unite and rally all of us for the victory we seek. I am ready to hit the ground running therefore if only I am given the chance! Please help me obtain that chance. Don't let me observe the continued destruction of our White Race as a helpless bystander for another twenty years from this lousy prison cell. I urge you rather to fight for my freedom so that I can fight again for you. Let me put my charisma and drive to good use on your behalf for I know that if you do I will unite and push our movement forward in ways that have never been seen before. At stake is the entire existence of our kind and I am committed to the preservation of that future at all costs.

          So, I want to be free so that I can be reunited with those whom I love: my family, my comrades, and my race itself as we together work for the future of us all. I also, however, want to be free so that I can return to the natural world which I believe in so much. It is not natural for a man to be cooped up in a box of steel, iron, and concrete for years on end; we are meant rather to behold trees, the other creatures of the world, and to feel the green grass under our feet. We are meant to feel the rain, the snow, and the sun. I would be remiss though if I did not mention too my beloved violin which I have likewise been deprived of all these years. As you may know I am a classical violinist who has both taught and played professionally. Just last night I had a dream that I was playing in concert again and sure would like to do so again before I am an old man. Music has always been such a huge part of my life; one of the reasons why I joined the cause for the preservation of our White Race in the first place, at the ripe old age of 12, is that I wanted to preserve the race which is capable of producing such beauty,the beauty of classical music. There can be no more Beethovens, no more Mozarts, and no more Tchaikovskys if we let our White Race be mongrelized and destroyed. Ape—like men can only produce ape—like things. the seed of beauty must be preserved and for me the very image of a violin is symbolic of the superiority of our kind. I do love it so, and would like to return to it! Would you help me to do that, my friends? Will you help me reclaim the life that was so wrongly taken from me so many years ago?

          And so I ask you to do your part today to secure my freedom. A mass movement for my release must be formed which simply cannot be denied. President Trump is the one president with the nerve and the guts to buck his phony "Justice" Department and let me go. That is the only option we have at this juncture. Therefore he must be reached and won over to the proposition of my release. If Nelson Mandela, an actual criminal, could be freed after 27 years of imprisonment due to the influence of the rallied masses the state, so can Matt Hale after 15 the same way. It all depends upon you and the power you can create. Nothing is impossible if you have the will and determination to see it through. The cause of my freedom must become the cause celebre of the entire Racial Loyalist movement. I'm counting on you to make that happen. Every pro—White website must carry the words, "Free Matt Hale!" Thousands of letters, emails, and signatures for my release must be sent to President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and others. Friends of President Trump must be reached in order that they may encourage him to release me as well. Help my stalwart mother, Evelyn Hutcheson, all you can. I have fought for you all my life. Bring me home so that I may return to my rightful place. Fifteen years of this is enough. Free Matt Hale!


Sunday, 18 February 2018

Who Killed John Kennedy...By Ben Klassen


No big mystery to those who understand the murderous MOSSAD, the nature of the sinister Jewish power establishment behind it, and to those few of us who have the guts to tell it as it is. Plainly, it was the Jewish MOSSAD who murdered John F. Kennedy.
Last November 22, my wife and I celebrated our forty-second wedding anniversary, and we did so in the company of our children and grandchildren on a special vacation at Disney World. On that same day the world widely acclaimed and publicized the anniversary of the criminal assassination of the then young and glamorous President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, shot down in cold blood in the streets of Dallas twenty-five years earlier. Numerous feature articles appeared in newspapers, tabloids and on television screens commemorating that fateful day. But after 25 years, the mystery of who shot Kennedy on November 22, 1963, seemingly still remains unsolved and beclouded. Numerous theories, mostly bizarre and off the mark, still swirl around that historic and dastardly deed.

I remember that day well, as undoubtedly do millions of others who were then old enough to realize the shock and impact of that foul crime. When my 12-year-old daughter came home from school that day, the first thing she said was "Boy! those Republicans don’t fool around, do they?" True, her assessment may have been premature and somewhat naive, but perhaps no more so than the numerous theories and conclusions floating around in the minds of the vast majority of the American public today, and certainly it was no more wild than the official conclusion put out by the Warren Commission that was quickly set up to whitewash and confuse the whole criminal affair. After months of "investigation" the commission managed to so contrive the "evidence" that it would support the conclusion they wanted to project even before they started the expensive and long drawn out probe – namely, that it was nothing more than one lone, erratic nut – Lee Harvey Oswald – who did the job, all by his impulsive little lonesome.
Despite the massive propaganda barrage that the Jews have slopped on us for the last 25 years, the American public and the world at large still won’t buy that ridiculous explanation. In fact, at the time of the 25th anniversary in 1988 there was not only widespread coverage recalling the event, but there were also a number of public opinion polls taken as to what the public believed or did not believe about the Warren Commission’s official verdict. The Orlando Sentinel ran one such poll in their program called "Sound Off." Of the 2039 callers who answered their key question – Did Lee Harvey Oswald act alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy? – 1890 callers (93 percent) said they did not believe it. This was 25 years later, and after the prestigious Warren Commission who had spent months of endless "investigation" saying that a lone nut was responsible and that was all – there was no conspiracy!

When this did not wash with the American public, the Rockefeller Commission was set up later to again investigate and whitewash the same affair, to try to shore up the public confidence in the Warren lie. When this still did not do the job, years later the House Select Committee on Assassination was set up, headed by a capable lawyer named Richard Sprague. When it seemed he might be coming too close to the facts, the CIA and FBI decided to have him sacked. The CIA took over and the cover-up of the crime proceeded to grind out the same impossible and ridiculously stupid conclusion as the Warren Commission. That the public still didn’t believe it was shown by numerous polls conducted at that time and the ensuing years. Today, after numerous books and thousands of articles and "documentaries" by the Jewish press, the public at large and the world as a whole overwhelmingly rejects the ridiculous conclusion that "there was no conspiracy," as Is shown by the Orlando Sentinel poll (93 percent rejection) and numerous other polls.
Although the American public is extremely gullible and will swallow most of the lies slopped upon it by the Jewish propaganda machine (such as the Holohoax) evidently the "official" Warren Commission lie is just too, too much even for the gullible American public to accept. And there is good and sufficient reason why such an outright and blatant lie cannot and will not wash, as we shall see. But whereas the American public will not buy the lone nut, no conspiracy story, it still remains hopelessly confused as to who did do it, and as to why Kennedy was assassinated.

Before we go into the who and the why, let us briefly review the known and accepted events of that fateful episode that in a few brief moments changed the course of American and world history.

On November 22, 1963 John Kennedy, in the company of his glamorous wife Jacqueline, was riding in an open motorcade through the streets of Dallas, ostensibly to shore up his sagging political Image. As he was riding by the Dealey Plaza and past the Texas School Book Depository Building at 12:30 PM, shots suddenly rang out. Governor John Connally, who was riding in the same car In a seat in front of Kennedy was severely wounded. John Kennedy, whose brains were blown out by one of the shots, was pronounced dead on arrival at the Parkland Hospital, to which the car was rushed.

Lee Harvey Oswald, a drifter and nonentity without means, had evidently been carefully coached and set up by the conspirators to play the part of the fall guy. He was seen running out of the Texas School Book Depository Building, and a Dallas policeman by the name of J.D. Tippit, who tried to arrest Oswald shortly thereafter, was shot and killed in the act. Presumably he was killed by Oswald, but even this conclusion is questionable. Shortly thereafter Oswald was captured and taken into custody.

He was promptly questioned by seven FBI agents for 12 hours. Forty-seven hours after Kennedy was shot, while in the custody of Federal agents and being transferred in a passageway beneath the Dallas police building, Oswald himself was gunned down by a Jewish night club operator named Jack Ruby, (real name - Jacob Rubenstein). This was done in broad daylight in full view of the television cameras, and thereby instantly was destroyed a highly visible but unstable key witness who could have shed considerable light on the conspiracy. He was, however, only one of 29 people who were connected with the conspiracy who were to die prematurely and violently under mysterious circumstances, as we shall see.

Lyndon B. Johnson, Vice-President under Kennedy, was quickly sworn in as President during the flight back from Dallas to Washington. Contrary to all legal procedures and to the laws of Texas, Kennedy’s body was also flown to Washington and taken out of the jurisdiction of the Texas authorities. So too was the investigation of this foul crime. The now president Lyndon Johnson quickly curtailed the investigation and bypassed independent Texas authorities who had prime legal jurisdiction by appointing the Warren Commission as the sole authority to do the job. Seemingly this was done because the crime was of such magnitude that the usual authorities who should have had legal jurisdiction (the Dallas police, the State of Texas) were too minor to be entrusted with such a major crime. Actually, the real reason, as we shall see, was so that the cover-up could be contained and controlled in one highly selective package, a package carefully stacked so that it could be trusted to do just what it did do – not to investigate the crime at all, but on the contrary, cover it up.

The Warren Commission, headed by Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, took over all aspects of the investigation and barred all other authorities who had prior and legal right to do so. In this it was backed up by the controlled Jewish press, by the FBI, and by the CIA. In fact, it became a willing tool of these latter two federal agencies and did as it was told.

The story of the cover-up was long and odious, and unfortunately, we cannot cover all the details of its many dubious procedures, nor can we fully review its preconceived conclusion that it contrived to report in thousands of pages. Let me repeat that after all the massive propaganda support it received, despite volumes of lies sworn to by the FBI and the CIA, the fact remains – that after 25 years, even a highly gullible American public does not believe the commission’s ridiculous and impossible fairy tale.
Basically, the conclusions the Warren Commission reported were these:

(a) There was no conspiracy.

(b) Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone nut, did it all by himself. He fired all the shots that killed Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally from a sixth story window of the Texas School Book Depository building.

(c) This consisted of only three shots fired from a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle made in Italy.

There is more, much more, thousands of pages of garbage, that is the story put out by the Warren Commission. It was the conclusion they were determined to foist on the public before they ever even started gathering "facts" and "information," and they stuck with it to the bitter end, either ignoring or twisting any evidence that did not fit their preconceived "conclusion." The story is so wild that it could easily fit into our series of "The Wildest Stories Ever Told."
The Wildest Stories Ever Told Part One By Ben Klassen  No wonder. The authors have a common mentor – the Jewish power establishment. Also, no wonder that after 25 years and massive doses of lies and propaganda the overwhelming majority of the American public still won’t buy it.

Here are some of the strange and bizarre antics and episodes that occurred during this blatant crime and fraudulent cover-up.

• Although the alleged key culprit, Lee Harvey Oswald, was questioned by seven FBI operatives for 12 hours, the transcripts of the interrogations were burned and destroyed forever.

• Oswald was murdered within 47 hours of the assassination by Jack Ruby, a sleazy pimp and himself a paid operative of the FBI. This he was ostensibly able (allowed) to do while Oswald was in the custody and "protection" of Federal agents.

• In order to make sure that Jack Ruby would not at some later date recant and spill the beans, he conveniently "died of cancer" while in prison awaiting trial.

• None of Oswald’s fingerprints were found on the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle with which he was accused of shooting the president. Since he rushed out of the Depository building Immediately after the president was shot, he would hardly have had the time to clean it up.

• Although Oswald was known to be a poor marksman with a rifle (several months earlier, April 6, 1963, to be exact, he had taken a shot at right-wing Maj. Gen. Edwin Walker and missed) the Warren Commission credited him with the miraculous feat of inflicting eight different wounds on President Kennedy and Governor John Connally within six seconds from a distance of more than 200 feet and at an angle that would have taxed the professional skills of even the world’s most expert marksman.

• One of these bullets was credited by the Warren Commission as having followed this most amazing route: It supposedly went through President Kennedy’s back and came out of his neck, then went through Gov. Connally’s back and out of his chest, into the Governor’s wrist and out of his wrist into his leg. Now, man, that is some shooting! Strangely, this same alleged bullet was then accidentally found lying on the floor of the Parkland Hospital where the victims were taken. When "discovered," this magic bullet was found to be clean as a whistle, unscarred and unmashed, even though It supposedly had traversed and shattered ribs, wrists and other bones in its most remarkable trajectory. Would you believe?

• The Warren report blandly stated that "no credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from any other place than the Texas School Depository Building." This despite the fact that the commission knew the names of at least 266 witnesses present at the scene of the crime. Of these two hundred and fifty nine were able to testify before the Dallas police, the Dallas Sheriff’s Dept., the FBI or the Secret Service. In the case of 68 persons interviewed or called as witnesses, the law enforcement interrogators "forgot" to ask where they thought the shots came from. Of the 90 who were asked this important question 58 said that the shots came from the grassy knoll (in front of the motorcade) and not from the Texas Book Depository Building (behind the motorcade). Strangely most of the 32 who disagreed about the shots coming from the grassy knoll were government officials, their wives, or aides. Nevertheless, even ignoring coercion or bribery of such officials two thirds of the witnesses affirmed they believed the shots came from the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade, a very important piece of evidentiary information the Commission chose to completely ignore. We will have more to say about this later.

• There was one individual spectator, a man by the name of Zapruder who happened to film the motorcade at the time of the shooting, using an 8mm movie camera. Since this was hard evidence that could refute the conclusions desired by the conspirators, the CIA moved quickly to appropriate the film.
LIFE magazine in Its October 2, 1964 Issue ran an article by then Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Michigan) who was a member of the Warren Commission. In this article, it ran eight pictures of the critical frames from the Zapruder film. In one issue frame No. 6 showed blood and brains spurting upward from the head of Kennedy. Evidently LIFE had committed an unforgivable error that could have run counter to the establishment’s directive. The presses were stopped in mid-run and a new No. 6 picture was substituted, which merely showed the president slumped over. Someone from higher up evidently gave the order. When a keen reporter (who had a copy of both issues) years later tried to obtain an explanation from LIFE, the management blandly denied that there had been a switch or that there had been two versions.

• Nitrate tests exonerated Lee Harvey Oswald from having fired a rifle on November 22, but this evidence was suppressed.

• Oswald vehemently denied that he had shot anybody, but because he evidently had much more he could tell, he was quickly murdered and removed from the picture.

• Oswald was questioned by a federal agent back in August 1963, but the notes were later burned.

• X-ray and autopsy pictures of the dead president have been concealed from the public to this day.

• The Warren Commission claims that only three shots were fired and all came from Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. Two of these shots were fired within 1.2 seconds (according to the Commission as evidenced by the Zapruder film). Officials of the Mannlicher Steyr factory in Italy found this most flattering, but stated that the time lapse between shots from their rifle had never been less than 2.3 seconds.
• When a newspaper in Spain (La Voz de Espana) printed that story and it was brought to the attention of the Senate Press Gallery, one of the pressmen (an agent of the CIA) asked if he could have the copy to photocopy it. It was "accidentally" destroyed.

• When the same individual who had dug up this issue tried to get another copy from the Spanish newspaper, he was told that they happened to have ample copies of every issue except that one particular issue. It had disappeared.
• During the Kennedy autopsy, his brain (what was left of it) was removed and placed in a stainless steel container with formalin. This chemical "sets" the brain tissue so it can be sliced and examined. It was placed in the National Archives, under lock and key.

Some years later, the neutron activation tests were perfected. These remarkable tests could accurately tell, for instance, by taking one hair from Napoleon’s head how much arsenic had been given to him to cause his death. They could also tell whether Kennedy had been shot from the front or the back. When forensic pathologists went to the National Archives to try to conduct just such tests and settle once and for all the question of from which direction had he been shot, the JFK brain had disappeared from the archives. To this day, nobody knows where it is (officially).

That the conspirators were determined to suppress the real information at all costs was evidenced by the fact that it was apparently dangerous to know too much about the crime, should such people not be subject to control in cooperating in the cover-up. I have already mentioned that two people, Lee Harvey Oswald, and Jack Ruby, met violent and untimely deaths. Both of them were part of the conspiracy, and neither apparently could be trusted not to blow the whistle. But they were only two out of a string of at least 29 people who had some knowledge of the conspiracy and who, over a period of years, died under mysterious and violent circumstances. These murders, too had to be covered up in an ever-widening circle of complications. That the conspirators, whoever they were, or are, have been able to successfully do so over the last 25 years proves more than anything else that the conspiracy is not only determined and pervasive, BUT ALSO TREMENDOUSLY POWERFUL. Here are a few of those that met with an untimely death because they knew too much.

• Dorothy Kilgallen, a nationally known syndicated columnist and television personality interviewed Jack Ruby during the latter’s trial for killing Oswald. She then made the mistake of telling her make-up man that she was going to "break the Kennedy assassination wide open within five days." Three days later, November 8, 1965, she was found dead in her apartment.

• Gary Underhill, a CIA agent, told friends he knew who killed Kennedy, and that he was sure that they would soon get him (Underhill) also. On May 8, 1964, Underhill was shot to death in Washington.

• William Pitzer, a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy had photographed the military-performed autopsy of JFK’s body. He told friends he had been ordered to keep quiet about what he saw and did so for years. Nevertheless, he was found dead with a bullet in his head on October 29, 1966.

• Carlos Prio Socarras, formerly a sometime president of Cuba and at one time a business associate of Jack Ruby, died on April 15, 1977, of what was declared "a self-inflicted’ gunshot wound to the chest.

• Joseph A. Milteer, who was identified by Miami Police as a "right-wing extremist," was secretly taped by the Florida lawmen in which he accurately described how Kennedy would be assassinated. This he did 13 days before the event. On February 9, 1974 a Coleman stove blew up in his bathroom. He died two weeks later, but the mortician who saw the body said the burns were not sufficient to cause his death.

• David Ferrie was a CIA contract pilot who flew secret missions into Cuba. New Orleans D.A., Jim Garrison, in a trial, questioned the flier, implying that Ferrie had flown the real killers out of Dallas and into Cuba immediately after the assassination. On February 21, 1967, a month after the questioning, David Ferrie was found dead in his apartment, shot in the heart.

There are more detailed stories easily available of people who knew too much and consequently died an untimely, violent death under mysterious circumstances. However, we do not have the space here to further pursue each case. I believe, however, that I have cited sufficient examples to show that the conspirators, whoever they might be, are powerful, are ruthless killers, and will leave no stone unturned in suppressing any evidence which they suspect might surface to blow their conspiracy.

* * * * *
We now come to the heart of the story. Who might these conspirators be? We have clearly established that there was a widespread conspiracy, planned long before its execution on November 22, 1963. More importantly, the evidence further strongly indicates that there was a vast cover-up, and It, too, was meticulously planned long before the Warren Commission was set up to whitewash the real conspirators and blame the "lone nut," Oswald, as the culprit of the foul deed. That Oswald was a naive patsy, and a small cog in the operation, of that there is no doubt, but he was neither the main instigator of the huge plot, nor is it likely that he even so much as fired a shot. Then who did? Moreover, who was powerful enough to successfully carry out a pervasive cover-up that spread not only throughout the nerve centers of power in this country but even to the press and power centers of foreign countries as well?

There are any number of individuals or groups who would have had motives to kill Kennedy, and perhaps would also have had the means to do so. After all, any man, no matter how well protected, is vulnerable to the assassin’s bullet, as has been proved more recently in that President Reagan was shot at and hit, as also was Pope John Paul II and a number of other highly protected individuals. From time to time, a considerable number have been mentioned as possible suspects of killing Kennedy, people and parties who had both the means and the motive:

• Fidel Castro, because there was information out that the U.S. was going to liquidate him.

• The anti-Castro groups, because Kennedy betrayed them at the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

• The Kremlin and the KGB because of the missile crisis and other frictions, had both motive and the means.

• The list that has been brought up at one time or another is almost endless. For one reason or another the following have also been mentioned: the CIA, the FBI, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, H.L. Hunt, E. Howard Hunt, Howard Hughes, Aristotle Onassis, David Rockefeller, and even Jacqueline Kennedy.

Each one of these, it has been argued, could have conceivably had some motive to see him dead. There is one major test, however, that none of these could possibly meet, and that is the all-pervasive power in the press, in the political field, in the judicial field (and several other major areas) to plan and stage a successful cover-up, something the conspirators have more or less succeeded in doing for the last 25 years.
Who could possibly have the power to do this? Who could stop the presses of LIFE magazine in mid-run and change pictures? Who could yank the Supreme Court Justice out of his routine and put him at the head of a whitewash committee? Who could command the whole news media to consistently support a blatant and transparent lie claiming that there was no conspiracy? Who could tell the Mannlicher-Carcano Corporation and its employees, even in Italy, to keep their mouths shut? Who could possibly murder at least 29 other people who knew too much and get away with it?

The Spotlight, in a series of articles it compiled over a period of years and put together in a book call
the Mystery Unraveled, asks similar questions, but then at the very end it gets cold feet and cops out by leaving the question unanswered, and thereby does not quite unravel the mystery. DeWest Hooker, who is credited with being the first to enlighten George Lincoln Rockwell about the evil ways of the Jew (see dedication of G.L.R.’s book, This Time the World) was also an early cohort of Willis Carto in their Nazi days, told me that Carto had told him that The Spotlight can use such terms as "dual loyalists," "Zionists," "Israelis," but had been forbidden to use the word "Jew" in reference to any culpability in any endeavor whatsoever. Who would have the power to tell Willis Carto and The Spotlight that they cannot ever under any circumstances accuse the Jews directly of anything?

Why, who else but the Jewish establishment and the Jewish powerhouse itself? It is they who have the power to not only suppress any information they deem deleterious or harmful to their cause, but they can also spread wholesale all over the world any lie or set of lies they deem beneficial to their cause, and this they blatantly have done for centuries. The cover-up of the Kennedy assassination is one major example, but by no means the only one. The Six Million lie, the holohoax, is an even bigger lie they have successfully promoted, and Communism and Christianity are two more gigantic Jewish lies.
The whole stance and position of The Spotlight is in itself a strange case in point. Whereas it proudly proclaims to print news that other papers (meaning the Jewish establishment papers) do not dare to print, it does in fact present a wealth of news on the many shady shenanigans the government and the Jewish establishment would just as soon the public did not hear. Many of these news items are directly aimed at our cozy relationship with Israel and how Israel is manipulating the United States and ripping off the American taxpayer. It has even run a powerful expose on the 1967 Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, and referred to it repeatedly, something the establishment press does not dare to touch.

But here is the strange paradox in The Spotlight’s position. It will go so far in pointing to the Jewish stranglehold in America and the world, but then it will pull back. It will never say explicitly, loud and clear, the Jews are behind it. Dual loyalists, Zionists, Israelis, yes, but not Jews, per se. The Jews, on the other hand, blatantly accuse The Spotlight of being violently anti-Semitic, and The Spotlight will vigorously deny it, and so they play the game. The fact is, there are a number of Jews on The Spotlight staff. Their star lawyer, Mark Lane, is a Jew. So are Charles M. Fischbein, the Collier brothers, Alfred Lilienthal and others.

Mark Lane’s and The Spotlight’s treatment of the Kennedy assassination is a case in point. Mark Lane has written a major book Rush to Judgment on this heinous crime, and written several subsequent follow-up articles, as have others on the staff. Mark Lane makes it very clear that the Warren Commission lied to the American public, that there was undoubtedly a vast conspiracy behind it, and that the whitewash and cover-up were of unprecedented magnitude. Anyone with an ounce of reasoning would be led to the same conclusion as we have come to – but strangely, he does not. He concludes that it was the CIA, which as we all know is American, don’t we? So the Jews, Israel, and the MOSSAD had nothing to do with it, right? But then, you wouldn’t expect a Jew to blow the whistle on the Jews, now would you?

This is a last minute diversion that is typical of most of The Spotlight’s reporting – point in that direction then cop out in the finale. All of which raises the question is The Spotlight controlled by the Jews, or isn’t it? We believe it is. We believe it fits neatly into the class III journal category, the Trap Classification, which is described in Protocol No. 11 of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Whereas The Spotlight is evidently (for obvious reasons) not willing to put the finger on the Jewish network for the assassination and cover-up of the Kennedy crime, we of the Church of the Creator come up with the obvious and only answer: The Jews planned the foul job and their murderous band of bloodthirsty killers, the MOSSAD pulled the trigger or triggers that killed Kennedy.
* * * * *

Who or what is the MOSSAD? Most Americans have never even heard of it, and few even know it exists. It is therefore cogent that we expand here briefly on the nature of the Jewish MOSSAD.

The MOSSAD is, in a way, the Israeli equivalent of our CIA, but it is much more. It is the Jewish intelligence-gathering arm, whose headquarters are in Tel Aviv, Israel, but their vast armies are spread into every country of the world. Like the CIA, they not only gather information relentlessly from every corner, nook and cranny of the world, but they also ruthlessly murder people they deem a threat to the Jewish conspiracy. They foment revolutions, hatch political plots, overthrow governments, assassinate key figures, stage commando raids where necessary, or organize revolutionary movements, all in the cause of the Jewish race. The CIA, or the Russian KGB do all these things also, but with this difference. Since the Jews control practically all the nerve centers of power throughout the United States and the world, so do the intelligence agencies of the United States collaborate with the MOSSAD. In short, the CIA and the KGB are adjuncts of the MOSSAD, with the MOSSAD firmly in control of all. The CIA feeds all important Information it gathers not only into its own computers in Washington, but also into the huge bank of computers in Tel Aviv. So does the KGB, so does the British Intelligence, the German and the French. The MOSSAD gathers all, but it does not give any back. It is a one-way street.

In fact, the CIA and FBI are heavily infiltrated by, and staffed with MOSSAD agents. The MOSSAD also makes sure that their own agents are in every agency of the government, in the staff of every congressman and senator, and, in fact, every important nerve center of power.

In short, the MOSSAD is purely Jewish – loyal only to Israel and the Jewish race and the worldwide Jewish conspiracy. It is the world’s most powerful, most efficient gang of killers. Although, historically speaking, the name of MOSSAD is of recent vintage, under other names the roots of these murderous brigades go far back in history. When the Jews describe the killing of 75,000 of their enemies in the Book of Esther, they were describing a typical MOSSAD operation, and they have been celebrating their PURIM every year ever since. Killing their enemies is what they mean by "having a good day." These killers run rampant throughout every country in the world, including, and especially, the United States. Our congressmen are acutely aware, and also deathly afraid of them, and for good reason, as are most personnel in the government’s employ.
It is my unswerving conclusion that when the Jews planned to assassinate John Kennedy, it was the MOSSAD which did the job. They had their professional triggermen carry out the execution and do it right. They had their sharpshooters set up behind a stone wall on the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade and when Kennedy was in close range they let him have it from front and back and blew his brains out. That is why the Warren Commission repeatedly ignored eyewitness reports about the shots from the activities on the grassy knoll. At the same time they placed Oswald in the School Book Depository Building to play the part of the fall guy, but you can be sure they did not leave the real killing job to a third rate bungler like Lee Harvey Oswald.

* * * * *

We now come to the question of motive. Why would the Jews want to kill Kennedy?

When it comes to motives, I confess I do not claim to be a mind reader. We can only speculate, look at the ensuing events of history and come up with cogent reasons as to why they did what they did. With that as a basis I can think of several important reasons why they would want to see John Kennedy dead, and I will list them in what I believe to be their order of importance.
1. According to the Canadian Intelligence Service of September, 1988, Kennedy committed the most deadly of all crimes in the eyes of the Jewish bankers. He bypassed the Jewish Federal Reserve and issued government notes. He committed the same unforgivable sin as did President Abraham Lincoln a hundred years earlier and for which he, too, paid the ultimate price. In the complex cover-up of the Kennedy murder, history repeated itself and a strangely similar modus operandi was used as in the cover-up of the Lincoln crime some 98 years earlier.

On June 30, 1963, Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110, and further amended E.O. No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, thereby giving the President authority to issue the currency. He thereupon ordered the issue of $4,292,893,815.00. This was almost ten times as much as the $450,000,000.00 printed by Lincoln during the Civil War. He evidently forced then Secretary of the Treasury, C. Douglas Dillon, another name changing Jew (Lapowski?), to sign the United States Notes. Shortly thereafter, on November 22, 1963, Kennedy paid the ultimate price and was shot, as was Lincoln.

The first thing President Johnson did when he flew back to Washington was to reverse this order. For good reasons this operation of printing U.S. notes (as mandated by the Constitution) has been shrouded in secrecy by the Jewish bankers, since, if it became general knowledge, would blow the cover on the whole Federal Reserve scam. Even among racial and ‘conservative’ circles there is much confusion and a general ignorance of this bold and monumental action. When I discussed this issue with Tom Metzger about a year ago, he vehemently assured me that he had thoroughly investigated this matter of Kennedy printing the notes, and that there was nothing to it.

However, we have the Executive Order number, the date, and the amount of the issuance, all stated In the above. Even more convincing, I have seen and personally held in my hand one of those U.S. notes – a five dollar bill.
2. The second serious infraction that Kennedy made in opposition to the Jewish conspiracy was his decision to end U.S. participation in the Vietnam fiasco before it had hardly begun, a move that angered the Jews, since they had planned an increasingly heavy, long term involvement in that stupid venture. Present on Air Force One with Kennedy on his fateful trip to Texas was Rep. Henry Gonzales of Texas. On March 21, 1988, Rep. Gonzales revealed a bit of significant history in a speech before the House. Gonzalez told that on said trip, Kennedy, as he rose to leave the (airplane) compartment, turned and said to him (paraphrased), "By the way, I have issued orders to pull all our military and their equipment from Vietnam, beginning this December." The Jews had different plans as we all know only too well. They planned to bleed the American treasury dry, to kill thousands of young American boys in the jungles of Vietnam and destroy American prestige and honor, what was then left of it. All this they did with a vengeance. Kennedy was killed within hours after he talked to Gonzalez, and Lyndon Johnson, as soon as he became president, reversed that order, and used the Tonkin Gulf "incident" to vastly expand the ill-fated American presence in Vietnam. This insane war helped to put billions of profits into the hands of the Jewish war profiteers, at the expense of the world’s foremost patsy, the White American taxpayer. (See Operation Rip-off, our Booklet No. 103.)

3. The third reason the Jews had for seeing Kennedy dead was inherent in the whole Kennedy clan. They had all the characteristics necessary to build a powerful goy dynasty, and this the Jews feared from the time old Joe Kennedy began building his powerful empire. The Kennedys were extremely wealthy, they were numerous, they were clannish, and they were politically ambitious and aggressive. Joe Kennedy already had ambitions in the thirties of grooming his oldest son Joe, Jr., to become a future president of the United States, and Joe, Jr. was shaping up to become an ideal candidate, being considerably more articulate and charismatic than was his younger brother John. Unfortunately, Joe was killed while on a bombing mission during W.W. II. Routine casualty of war, or did the Jew plan it that way? We will never know, but Joe Jr. was out of the way,
accidentally or deliberately. Joe Sr. still had three more sons, and he next groomed son John, who, as we all know, by hook or by crook did become president in 1960. We also know that Bobby became Attorney General, and later Senator. Teddy as we all know also became Senator, and is still in the Senate today. The third generation of Kennedys are also entering the political domain, despite three violent deaths in the Kennedy clan.

There was one other thing that the Jews feared about the Kennedys. Although we have been told about their extreme liberal orientation in the Democratic Party, essentially old Joe and his four boys were extremely well versed in the existence of the worldwide Jewish network and their string pulling. Although John feigned to go along with Israel and the Jews, it was not sincere, paying only lip service for political gain. The Jews, being well trained in detecting the innermost sentiments of their enemies since before the days of Esther, did not trust John Kennedy and feared the rise of a Kennedy dynasty that might turn on them at the earliest opportunity. In his decisions on Vietnam, on issuing U.S. notes without the benefit of the Federal Reserve and in his lukewarm support of Israel, John Kennedy was already beginning to display his rebellion against the Jewish powerhouse. Consequently he had to go, as five years later in 1968, did his brother Bobby, and Teddy, being of even more dubious moral fibre, is now thoroughly locked in their embrace.

4. Shortly before he was assassinated Kennedy made a speech to a group of Cuban patriots in Miami. In this speech he revealed that he had been betrayed and double-crossed during the Bay of Pigs invasion, that whereas he had ordered air cover, someone in the chain of command reversed the order at the last moment and left the Cuban freedom fighters to the mercy of Castro’s militia. "We will have our revenge!" he is quoted as saying. The Jews, who put Castro in power in the first place, saw it otherwise, and were determined that Cuba remain in the Communist camp.

5. Back in 1963, before he was shot, John himself did not have the public image of being the great "hero" that the glitz and hoopla of Jewish propaganda has now, 25 years later, built him up to be. In fact, he was thoroughly hated and despised by many. After his Bay of Pigs debacle in Cuba, he was regarded as a wimp by many. After he used 20,000 army troops in strong-arm tactics to force one miserable nigger into the university at Oxford, Mississippi, he enraged most of the White electorate and many people began to ask "Whose side is this damn fellow on, anyway?" His many extramarital affairs with prostitutes and other sleazy characters earned him nothing but disgust. Nor did his associations with the Frank Sinatra "rat pack" and Mafia characters win him any popularity ratings. The fact is while he was alive, he was becoming the laughing stock of the American electorate. A phonograph record put out by nightclub comic Vaughn Meader parodying the Kennedy family was rapidly becoming a runaway best seller, and the nightclub comedians, too, in general, were having a field day in which the Kennedys were the butt of their jokes.

What did all this have to do with the Jews? Well, a great deal. It was at this time, in the early sixties, that the Jews were getting their major onslaught into high gear to ram their plethora of "civil rights" legislation through congress, but with the unpopular image with which the Kennedy administration was now saddled, they were getting nowhere. All this changed overnight after he was shot. He now suddenly became a legendary hero, and the American nation not only was in shock, but somehow felt terribly guilty about his death. President Johnson (actually the Jews) wasted no time capitalizing on this ridiculous guilt feeling, and "in the name of our martyred President," he and congress rushed through one civil rights bill after another, all designed to mongrelize and pump the black blood of Africa into the unwilling veins of White America.

6. There was one other extra dividend the Jews reaped from this murderous affair. Whereas old Joe Kennedy (and the family) had a major grip on the liquor industry, especially the importation of Scotch whiskey, this now rapidly slipped out of their hands and to the benefit of the rival (Jewish) Bronfman family. Although it was not really a significant factor in causing Kennedy’s execution, nevertheless, the Jews never miss a bet in cashing in financially.
So John Kennedy was murdered by a brigade of professional killers, the Jewish MOSSAD. Both the execution and the cover-up were planned months in advance by the only force in the world that had the pervasive power to draw on all its resources in the news media, the government and the judicial agencies, namely the worldwide Jewish network. Nobody else could have done it and made it stick, and that, my White Racial Comrades, is an obvious fact.

* * * * *

Such is the nature of our treacherous enemy. Unless we smash this rapacious beast it will certainly devour us all. The only way we can stop the Jews from destroying the White Race is to smash this sinister behemoth to smithereens, once and for all, and the only way it can be done is with a superior and more powerful force than theirs. Let us remember that the Jews built their power network solely through the aegis of their racial religion. With 500 million White people on this planet we certainly still have the wherewithal to destroy this plague upon mankind, and with Creativity as the rallying point we have the vehicle and the means with which to do the job. Do your part in building that power structure. Become a militant partisan, an activist Creator in the fight for survival, expansion and advancement of the White Race. Become involved, heavily involved! Time is of the essence.

* * * * *
Extract from Protocol 11
(From Page 223 of Nature’s Eternal Religion)

The future despotic Jewish State will have three classes of journals that they will control. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. These journals will always stand guard over the Jewish interests and they admit that, therefore, their influence will be comparatively small. In the second rank will be semi-official organs whose part it will be to attract the tepid and indifferent Goyim. In the third rank they will set up their own papers, but to all appearances they will be In opposition to their regime. This will (a) trap their real opponents to accept this simulated position as their own. (b) They can lead the opposition opinion into the very channels to which they then desire, and thereby neutralize them.

* * * * *
In this regard, Racial Loyalty stands nearly alone in category No. 4 – a journal which the Jew can’t control, and truly loathes and fears.

Ben Klassen
Founder Church of the Creator

January 16AC (1989)

Sunday, 11 February 2018

Rev Matt Hale (Civil Case)... Response to Plaintiff's Motion Reguarding Declarations


Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MJW





Mr. Hale seeks to have the Court accept filings from persons who are not parties to this case. Doc. 206, “Motion to Allow Declarations by Non-Parties to be Filed.” These declarations are related to a prior “Notice,” in which Mr. Hale raises several allegations against the BOP. Doc. 204, “Notice of Recent Continuing Unlawful Activity by the Defendant and its Employees Germane to the Eventual Resolution of this Case” (“Notice”). The Court should deny the motion because the Notice itself is not a proper filing under the procedures established by this Court.

The Notice is the fourth in a pattern of filings that are actually extra briefs related to the
pending motion for summary judgment. See Doc. 200 (“Clarification Regarding Press

Release(s)”); Doc. 201 (“Notice of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedy Regarding Ban on All
of Plaintiff’s Religious Mail”); Doc. 202 (“Motion to Strike and Response to So-Called ‘Fact
Exhibit’”). Mr. Hale describes this most recent Notice as containing “allegations” against the BOP that he deems to be “Germane to the Eventual Resolution of this Case.” Doc. 204 at 1;

Doc. 206 at 2 (discussing Hale’s “allegations”). Briefing on the motion for summary judgment
has closed, and the Court should not countenance Mr. Hale’s fourth attempt to submit an
improper surreply. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d) (full briefing on a motion consists of the
motion, response, and reply); see also C.J. Krieger Civ. Practice Standard 7.6.2(c) (discussing
motion for summary judgment, response, and reply).1 Therefore, no supporting declarations in
support of the Notice are warranted.

In any event, if the Court examines the substance of Mr. Hale’s filings, the factual allegations in the Notice and subsequent motion for declarations are inaccurate. Mr. Hale accuses the BOP of violating “federal law and B.O.P. policy” by returning mail to his followers in October and November 2017, and that the former Warden of the ADX “lied” to his mother
about the address for the ADX. Doc. 204 ¶¶ 3-5; see also id. ¶ 8 (noting that Hale is trying to get
an ADX Special Investigative Services Technician arrested). In fact, the mailing address for
inmates incarcerated at the ADX is P.O. Box 8000, but mailings sent to P.O. Box 8500 are also delivered to inmates, including Mr. Hale. Declaration of Amy Kelley, Exhibit 1 ¶¶ 8-10.

It is also not the case that the BOP “is stopping [Mr. Hale] from receiving mail” from the persons from whom he has solicited declarations. Doc. 206 at 2. Since Mr. Hale was re-designated to the ADX in April 2017, he has received 52 letters that included “a declaration for
this action or the copy of some sort of pleading or filing by that correspondent in this action.” Id.
1 See also Partminer Worldwide Inc. v. Silconexpert Technologies Inc., No. 09-cv-00586-MSKMJW,
2011 WL 587971, at *6 (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2011) (recognizing that, “when a party believes
that the contentions in the opponent’s reply brief require a response, the proper approach is for
the party to seek leave to file a surreply,” and finding that a party’s “objections to misstatements
in [a] reply brief . . . were an improper surreply”) (citing Pippin v. Burlington Resources Oil &
Gas Co., 440 F.3d 1186, 1192 (10th Cir. 2006)).

¶ 17. He has received declarations from his followers as recently as February 2018. Id. During
the entire period from April 2017 to the present, the BOP has rejected only three incoming
mailings that included a correspondent’s declaration, and that was because the mailings also
contained security threat group information, which inmates are not allowed to possess. Id. ¶ 18.

Those mailings were not rejected because of the declarations. Id.
Finally, by BOP policy, Mr. Hale cannot receive books from persons or entities
masquerading as bookstores. See Doc. 204 ¶ 7 (contending that he has not been allowed to
receive a “final Creativity book”). The book was rejected because the BOP could not determine
the identity of the sender—someone or something that called itself “MBookman Bookseller.”
Exhibit 1 ¶¶ 13-14. As the ADX Special Investigative Services Lieutenant explains, “[a]
publication does not need to be sent by Amazon or similar retail corporation in order to be
approved, but it must have some indicia of legitimacy or ways that correctional staff—who must
cull through voluminous records to determine when outside actors are passing unsafe, unsecure,
or dangerous information to convicted inmates—can determine its status as a publisher, book
club, or bookstore.” Id. ¶ 14. Here, the necessary indicia of legitimacy of “MBookman” was completely lacking. Id.

The Court should deny Mr. Hale’s motion. Doc. 206.

Respectfully submitted on February 9, 2018.


United States Attorney
s/ Susan Prose

Susan Prose

Assistant United States Attorney
1801 California Street, Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Tel.: (303) 454-0100; Fax: (303) 454-0404
Counsel for the Federal Bureau of Prisons
I hereby certify that on February 9, 2018, I served the foregoing document2 on the
following non-CM/ECF participant by United States mail addressed as follows:

Matthew Hale
Reg. No. 15177-424
ADX – Florence
P.O. Box 8500
Florence, CO 81226
s/ Susan Prose

Susan Prose

United States Attorney’s Office
2 A copy of the unpublished case cited in this response was previously provided to Mr. Hale.

                                                     THE CREATIVITY MOVEMENT