Rev Matt Hale(Civil Case)...Amicus Curiae Commentary to the Defendant BOP's Request to Restrict Accsess to Docket entry 234 (Doc 236)...By Gregory Morris

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

REVEREND MATT HALE
Plaintiff

V.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00245-MSK-MUW


AMICUS CURIAE COMMENTARY TO THE DEFENDANT BOP'S REQUEST TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO DOCKET ENTRY 234 (DOCUMENT 236)


COMES NOW, Gregory Morris a forty three (43) year old American Man who is a friend and supporter of the Plaintiff Matthew Hale. For the official record, I am also an adherent to the Plaintiff's Creativity religion. and therefore am proud to have and hold and claim and practise and share a joint in common 14th  amendment of the US Constitution liberty interest- in practising and jointly expressing that protected religious and philosophical - liberty interest in said Creativity religion that is secured and protected in the First Amendment of the Federal Constitution.

That all being stated, it is my understanding, based on information and belief, that the Defendant BOP is attempting to use the judicial branch of the Government as a tool, in an effort to unlawfully restrict, and or censor a specific chapter or section thereof  pertaining to a new book of philosophy that Reverend Matthew Hale is writing within his federal prison cell in Florence, Colorado Super Max Prison. On the alleged grounds that the information is said chapter or section of said book and as such, is somehow denigrating non-Whites persons and adherents of Christianity.
Furthermore, the Defendant's council Susan Prose- goes on to make an outrageous and highly prejudicial mischaracterization of Rev Hale's adherents to the Creativity religion. However, Defendant's council uses the title "followers" in the context and text of document (236) as if our adherents, and supporters of the Creativity religion and it's philosophy are a criminal group or organization. 

I Gregory Morris, strongly object to the misrepresentations and mischaracterizations made against my person as well as the rest of us adherents of the Creativity religion and philosophy. Furthermore, I respectfully move the court to enter my strong objection to the request to restrict access to docket entry 234,  on the basis that by restricting public access to said information, will constitute a clear violation of , certain members of the general publics first amendment freedom of speech and freedom of expression and freedom of association - with respect to being able to communicate and exchange views , opinions, etc..... with respect to Rev Matthew Hale's new book of philosophy.

**************************************************************************

TO READ THIS DOCUMENT IN IT'S ENTIRETY ….  See … FREE MATT HALE SITE...…….

AMICUS CURIAE COMMENTARY TO THE DEFENDANT BOP'S REQUEST TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO DOCKET ENTRY 234 (DOCUMENT 236)